Потребителско име: Парола:
Регистрация на нов потребител
Отговорник: Vikings 
 Politics

Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.


All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..

As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.

Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!


*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."


Съобщения на страница:
Списък с дискусии
Тук не Ви е разрешено да публикувате съобщения. Изисква се ниво на членство най-малко Мозъчна Пешка.
Режим: Всеки може да публикува
Търси сред публикуваното:  

23. август 2012, 22:03:35
Mort 
... How does the US Christian Churches justify the change in policy?

Yes, I say policy, for if the idea that Mormonism is Satanism is not a solid 'biblical' statement from God. If it was, then Mormonism would still be as a solid law from God... SaTaNiSm.

But now, the Churches are split... some say yes, some not, some are undecided..

God must be so ... ... fickle!!

23. август 2012, 23:22:32
The Col 
Относно: Re: How does the US Christian Churches justify the change in policy?
(V): Power , it's as simple as that.

23. август 2012, 23:28:27
Mort 
Относно: Re: How does the US Christian Churches justify the change in policy?
The Col: Not very Christian placing power on Earth over ya so called 'christian values' is it!!

.. It's not a new idea though.

23. август 2012, 23:36:23
The Col 
Относно: Re: How does the US Christian Churches justify the change in policy?
(V): They figure Romney will forward their agenda when he gets elected anyway.McCain had a backbone and wouldn't be as likely to cave to their wishes in regards to "personhood" and the outlawing of abortion nationwide.

23. август 2012, 23:40:39
Mort 
Относно: Re: They figure Romney will forward their agenda when he gets elected anyway.
The Col: Really... how? And isn't that a bit hypocritical... small government, yet you are now wanting to use government to ban abortions!! Even at a state level that's hypocritical.

"McCain had a backbone and wouldn't be as likely to cave to their wishes in regards to "personhood" and the outlawing of abortion nationwide."

And what if a visitor arrives from another country, gets raped by a US citizen, ends up in hospital for months and wants to abort, let alone their own women.

23. август 2012, 23:43:38
The Col 
Относно: Re: They figure Romney will forward their agenda when he gets elected anyway.
(V): Abortion will be outlawed even in instances of rape or incest, it is in the Republican platform

23. август 2012, 23:44:45
Papa Zoom 
Относно: Re: They figure Romney will forward their agenda when he gets elected anyway.
The Col: When is it ok to kill a baby in the womb?

23. август 2012, 23:48:24
The Col 
Относно: Re: They figure Romney will forward their agenda when he gets elected anyway.
Artful Dodger: Ending a pregnancy brought about by rape and incest is a good idea, no?

24. август 2012, 00:05:11
Papa Zoom 
Относно: Re: They figure Romney will forward their agenda when he gets elected anyway.
The Col: You're not ending a pregnancy. You are taking the life of a baby in the womb. So just to be clear, you agree that killing a baby in the womb is justified if the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest?

What other situation do you agree where killing the unborn baby in the womb is acceptable?

24. август 2012, 00:08:54
The Col 
Относно: Re: They figure Romney will forward their agenda when he gets elected anyway.
Artful Dodger: Do you agree a woman should be forced to carry to term a child from rape or incest?
I also agree in ending the pregnancy if the life of the mother is in danger

24. август 2012, 00:58:56
Papa Zoom 
Относно: Re: They figure Romney will forward their agenda when he gets elected anyway.
The Col: You haven't answered my original question. You only asked a question in return. We'll get to your questions after you've answered mine. It seems that your position is that abortion is wrong unless it's for the life of the mother or in the case of rape and incest. Is that your position? You oppose abortion in all other instances?

23. август 2012, 23:48:20
Mort 
Относно: Re: Abortion will be outlawed even in instances of rape or incest, it is in the Republican platform
The Col: I know.... but getting it through!!

I hope they are willing to cover the extra cost that the ER, doctors and hospitals will find themselves spending to help the sick women that result from driving abortions underground.

... But it just about the perceived Bible interpretation being right!! Can't waste semen, as it is all that is needed to create life.

egg, womb, women.. irrelevant.

23. август 2012, 23:50:43
The Col 
Относно: Re Can't waste semen, as it is all that is needed to create life
(V): Yes, the masturbation police will be combing the country

23. август 2012, 23:53:57
Mort 
Относно: Re: Re Can't waste semen, as it is all that is needed to create life
The Col: Then what. Back to no condoms??

Good way to increase the US death rates.

23. август 2012, 23:24:44
Iamon lyme 
Относно: Re:
(V): For someone who does not believe in God, you seem strangely interested in what He does or doesn't do. I've seen this with other atheists, and it doesn't make sense. When I was an atheist, it never occurred to me that I should be concerned about a God that doesn't exist. I wasn't worried about Christians, because for the most part I could see them practicing what they preached. I could be among them, and even argue with them, but I never perceived them as any kind of threat.

On the other hand, if I was among other atheists I quickly learned not to argue with any of them, because if I did it could get ugly and sometimes even unsafe.

It's a little disconcerting when people are promoting peace in a violent way, and I know that at any moment it could spill over to where I am standing. That was a never a problem when I was among Christians. So you can point and cry out "hypocrite" all you want, it doesn't matter to me. I learned a long time ago how hypocrites behave.

23. август 2012, 23:32:00
Papa Zoom 
Относно: Re:
Iamon lyme: Jules likes to bash Christians and so does the Col. And if one Christian does it, or one Christian organization does it, they lump them altogether. Such deep thinkers.

23. август 2012, 23:39:41
The Col 
Относно: ReJules likes to bash Christians and so does the Col
Artful Dodger: Why don't you grow a pair, and speak directly to me if you are going to mention me in a comment?

23. август 2012, 23:44:12
Mort 
Относно: Re: ReJules likes to bash Christians and so does the Col
The Col: Aren't Christians allowed to challenge dogma? I was taught I could!!

Дата и час
Приятели на линия
Любими дискусии
Дружества
Подсказка на деня
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Филип Рачунек, всички права запазени
Нагоре