Потребителско име: Парола:
Регистрация на нов потребител
Отговорник: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Съобщения на страница:
Списък с дискусии
Тук не Ви е разрешено да публикувате съобщения. Изисква се ниво на членство най-малко Мозъчна Пешка.
Режим: Всеки може да публикува
Търси сред публикуваното:  

5. юли 2006, 06:47:40
Foxy Lady 
Относно: Re: I hate to be a party pooper
Groucho: I agree with you pawns with multi accounts can cheat very easy.We Black Rooks have nothing to gain, except if we won is to give our prize to another member.I'd gladly give a prize away to a pawn thats been playing here for awhile.
Not to someone who has been on here under 6 months and who is a problem.IMO thats rewarding for unruly behavior.

5. юли 2006, 06:50:57
heavenlyemma 
Относно: Re: I hate to be a party pooper
Foxy Lady: I'm a pawn


Nahhhhh just kidding

5. юли 2006, 06:52:33
Papa Zoom 
Относно: Re: I hate to be a party pooper
Foxy Lady:  Which is why a per - opponent point limit (POPL) is a good idea. ;)

5. юли 2006, 06:55:28
Foxy Lady 
Относно: Re: I hate to be a party pooper
Groucho: Exactly!!!!!

5. юли 2006, 06:56:59
playBunny 
Относно: Re: I hate to be a party pooper
Groucho: It sounds like you have personal issues with someone. Someone pooped your party and you want to poop back.

5. юли 2006, 07:02:40
Foxy Lady 
Относно: Re: I hate to be a party pooper
Променен от Foxy Lady (5. юли 2006, 07:04:25)
playBunny: Thats not fair at all IMO and that remark is called baiting.

5. юли 2006, 07:05:36
heavenlyemma 
Относно: Re: I hate to be a party pooper
Foxy Lady: Yep!!

5. юли 2006, 07:03:09
Papa Zoom 
Относно: Re: I hate to be a party pooper
playBunny: Not at all. It doesn't affect me directly but I do think it's something to look at. Why do you object to a POPL? It seems reasonable to me since you play with other pawns anyway and the playing field would be leveled anyway.

A point limit per opponent would help to assure that an unscrupulous multinic couldn't win a membership or anything for that matter.

We'll find out soon enough if I'm all wet or on to something. I'm sure tomorrow other will chime in their thoughts. Or we'll get the notice. ;)

5. юли 2006, 07:08:19
playBunny 
Относно: Re: I hate to be a party pooper
Променен от playBunny (5. юли 2006, 14:57:44)
Foxy Lady: Are you insinuating that *** names removed ****, all of whom have been here less than 6 months and are currently strong contenders for a membership prize, are a problem, people who have exhibited unruly behavior? Are you suggesting that these persons are cheating multi-nicks?

Please be clear about what you are saying. Innuendo does not make worthy postings.

Which is why a Per Opinionated Post Limit (POPL) is a good idea. ;-)


edit by Eriisa. Names removed

5. юли 2006, 07:10:50
playBunny 
Относно: Re: I hate to be a party pooper
Foxy Lady: "Not to someone who has been on here under 6 months and who is a problem.IMO thats rewarding for unruly behavior."

You obviously have someone specific in mind for such a statement Foxy Lady. If that's not baiting them then what is this baiting thing that you are on about?

5. юли 2006, 07:20:29
Papa Zoom 
Относно: Re: I hate to be a party pooper
playBunny: The point being made is that the potential for abuse is wide open with the current structure. I'm not trying to rain on your parade. I know you are at the top of the pawns but I don't have you in mind anyway. So relax. I frankly don't really care about how the paid membership side is structured, although I think a POPL there is wise also. But in BK we have had a history of multinics etc and abuse in the past and the current Action Point structure has at least one loophole I think needs to be reconsidered.

5. юли 2006, 07:37:30
playBunny 
Относно: Re: I hate to be a party pooper
Groucho: What, precisely, is your proposal. I'd like you to demonstrate how it will affect the current structure.

Дата и час
Приятели на линия
Любими дискусии
Дружества
Подсказка на деня
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Филип Рачунек, всички права запазени
Нагоре