Nume utilizator: Parolã:
Înregistrare utilizator nou
Moderator: Vikings 
 Poker

Discuss about all online poker variants.

  • Poker Tables
  • Rules for Texas Hold'em



  • Mesaje pe paginã:
    Lista posturilor afişate
    Nu eşti autorizat sã scrii pe acest panou.Pentru a putea adãuga mesaje trebuie sã ai nivelul de (0)
    Mod: Toatã lumea poate afişa
    Cautã între posturi:  

    << <   5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14   > >>
    4. Mai 2009, 20:35:39
    Bwild 
    Subiectul: Re: buy in
    Czuch: no rule says leaving is wrong....but it is frustrating when some donk stays whith crapola..then catches on the river and banks your chips.
    when fencer finally figures out how to do tournys...you'll hardly ever see me on the open tables.

    4. Mai 2009, 19:56:12
    Czuch 
    Subiectul: Re: buy in
    Modificat de Czuch (4. Mai 2009, 19:57:11)
    Bwild: I agree if someone is leaving and then coming back and somehow getting around the blinds, that is not right.

    But I have a different take on "banking".... On one hand, I see an advantage to "banking" after doubling up or whatever, and then coming back with less to risk if someone wants to put you all in.

    But to me if someone wants to "bank", I feel I get an advantage over them. To me, it is easier to win if you outstack everyone else at the table. So, for example, I have 20K at a 2K table, I can now buy a lot more pots with losing hands than I can if I am short stacked, or conversly, I can make the "banker" (who has now just 2K) fold more winning hands when I push them all in, with a lot less risk to my stack if they call me, than if they had 5K or 10K.

    Or another example.... I have just come in with 2K, or lost a hand and have 1K, and the "banker" has just turned in his 10K and come back with 2K. Now he lost his advantage to bully me around with his big stack and make me fold a winning hand when he puts me all in.


    I see how it can seem frustrating when someone takes you in a big pot, and then takes "your" money off the table. But in my opinion, he has really just done you and everyone else at the table a big favor

    But I am sure that someone can prove how my theory is wrong

    2. Mai 2009, 14:40:22
    Bwild 
    Subiectul: buy in
    you know...its plain bs when you have players win one hand...leave bank their money then sit back in for free. its bad poker etiquette....but here at brain king its done on a regular basis.
    the deal order is still messed up....and its not uncommon to see your last 2 hole cards,instead of what your actually dealt.
    no answer..(not even a sarcastic one) on the status of any improvements....so I guess I will continually complain until something is done.

    2. Mai 2009, 05:12:51
    Bwild 
    5k poker anyone?

    1. Mai 2009, 15:28:42
    Bwild 
    Subiectul: Re:
    BlackBeauty: feel free to join a table

    1. Mai 2009, 04:12:52
    BlackBeauty 
    Subiectul: Re:
    Bwild: I wouldn't mind a game of poker :)

    30. Aprilie 2009, 05:05:44
    Bwild 

    28. Aprilie 2009, 00:13:08
    wildrose 
    Subiectul: Re:
    Then ok I got 190

    27. Aprilie 2009, 21:31:26
    Czuch 
    Subiectul: Re:
    Summertop: Yeah..brag about going all in because you are big blind and you only have enough chips left to go all in, and then you win the hand and get an achievement for your big gamble paying off

    27. Aprilie 2009, 18:48:49
    Bwild 
    Subiectul: Re:
    Summertop:

    27. Aprilie 2009, 18:36:30
    Summertop 
    Brag

    27. Aprilie 2009, 06:40:56
    wildrose 
    Subiectul: achievement points
    what can we do with them????

    23. Aprilie 2009, 23:59:48
    bobwhoosta 
    If we had a "Show Hand" feature, that would bring up another achievement: "Nasty BLUFF".

    The requirements would be to win a pot of more than 1000, have the person fold the winning hand, then they must show the winning hand, then you must show a hand lower than Ace High.

    It should we worth 3000 points.

    23. Aprilie 2009, 15:05:57
    Bwild 
    Subiectul: Re:
    Czuch: means you gotta czech czuck

    23. Aprilie 2009, 14:33:12
    Fencer 
    Subiectul: Re:
    Czuch: That's correct.

    23. Aprilie 2009, 12:55:41
    Czuch 
    Fencer.... it seems that we are not credited with an achievement for a winning hand if nobody calls our last bet (the hand is not shown)

    21. Aprilie 2009, 11:03:53
    gene 
    je voudrais jouer au poker et j arriver et ce que quelle pourrai m expliquer thank you

    19. Aprilie 2009, 22:06:21
    alilsassy 
    there on the no limit tables...good luck

    19. Aprilie 2009, 21:38:43
    jessica 
    where are all the poker players?

    16. Aprilie 2009, 00:45:09
    JPS 
    NO LIMIT PLAYERS - WHERE ARE YOU ???
    see you at 50/100 table.... please (?)

    15. Aprilie 2009, 00:40:34
    Czuch 
    no limits time

    11. Aprilie 2009, 05:27:33
    Bwild 
    no limit anyone?

    7. Aprilie 2009, 03:20:06
    Bwild 
    no limit?

    6. Aprilie 2009, 04:25:51
    Bwild 
    no limit?

    5. Aprilie 2009, 18:38:56
    Bwild 
    no limit players?

    1. Aprilie 2009, 23:41:38
    Czuch 
    some no limit poker anyone?

    1. Aprilie 2009, 06:13:59
    Bernice 
    Subiectul: Re:
    Bwild: yes the word sure does travel...

    1. Aprilie 2009, 05:15:21
    Bwild 
    Subiectul: Re:
    Bernice: and some just joined...I saw one person join and be playin poker within a minute.

    1. Aprilie 2009, 05:13:04
    Bernice 
    has anybody noticed that 50% of the top players are all pawns....

    that would be a good reason to charge a small fee for the pleasure of playing wouldnt it LOL.....

    31. Martie 2009, 22:37:51
    JPS 
    Subiectul: Re: Problem report
    Fencer: ty

    31. Martie 2009, 22:02:41
    Fencer 
    Subiectul: Re: Problem report
    JPS: Released.

    31. Martie 2009, 21:50:18
    JPS 
    Subiectul: Problem report
    Fencer: me and dp13 decided to play at the 50/100 no limit table... my small blind bet was the last thing we saw, then I got stucked there and nothing else happened. What's the matter? I got out of BB and turn my computer off twice... but I'm still stucked at that table and it doesn't work even when other players join it.
    ty

    27. Martie 2009, 09:41:23
    saeco 
    there is another problem with no limit holdem: say the blinds are 10/20 and i raise 60 (to make it 80) my opponent can't raise less than 60 (to make it at least 140). right now you can always raise the bigblind(20 in this example), but this is incorrect

    26. Martie 2009, 19:41:14
    Bwild 
    Subiectul: Re:
    rod03801: that was it..thx

    26. Martie 2009, 19:40:46
    Bwild 

    26. Martie 2009, 18:29:57
    rod03801 
    Subiectul: Re:
    Bwild: See my post in your fellowship. It is because you must be in Rich Text Editor. If you use that, you have to use the chain link thing to put a link in a post. If you switch out of rich text editor, doing it the way you did it works fine.

    26. Martie 2009, 17:12:06
    Fencer 
    Subiectul: Re: Less Than Big Blind Kicked Out.
    bobwhoosta: I am always grateful for a clarification of the rules because I am not aware of all details and special situations. But everything can be done, sooner or later.

    26. Martie 2009, 17:05:43
    bobwhoosta 
    Subiectul: Re: Less Than Big Blind Kicked Out.
    Fencer: There are three scenarios Puupia is reffering too.

    Case 1: Unable to go All-In mid-hand - In this scenario, if someone is in the middle of the hand he is unable to go all-in if he holds less than the Big Blind in his stack. This prevents players from making that little bit of extra money when they hit their hand after betting has dwindled their stack size. Their bet will mostly be called, so when someone gets a monster hand, they'll be slightly miffed that they can't go all-in.

    Case 2: Cash Games - In this scenario, a person sitting at the table who has lost most of their chips still has an all-in move available pre-flop (For instance, in 100/200 blinds a person with 190 chips can sit around for one round waiting for a good hand, then try and triple up). In this instance, the person would be well advised to get out with their remaining chips, as any all-in move holds absolutely no clout and they will most likely lose their chips. BUT, that decision could be left up to them.

    Case 2: Tournament Play - When tournaments come into play, this will become a VERY big problem, as someone with less chips than the big blind is by the rules of tournament Hold-'Em STILL a part of the tournament, and their chips are still in play. In the situation where someone is kicked out, we have two breaches of the rules. First, they have been unfairly eliminated, as by the rules they are still in the game (albeit with a very slim chance of winning). Second, their chips are still in play, and if that 1000 in chips (Assuming 1000/2000 blinds, not uncommon at the end of extremely long tournaments) is taken out of the tournament, it becomes unfair not only to the player eliminated, but to those remaining in the tournament, as they are deprived of precious opportunities to improve their stack size with very little risk.

    I hope this clarifies things, and as an aside I would like to say that I think your poker implementation is very good, especially for a first attempt on this site not only for a game different than a board game, but also for a live play event. We all understand your efforts, and though it is not often expressed, your work is very much appreciated.

    -Zak Smith

    26. Martie 2009, 17:01:50
    puupia 
    Subiectul: Re:
    Fencer: "If you have chip and a chair you can win" is one the most famous lines in poker. In 1982 WSOP Jack Strauss actually came back to win the tournament after being down to just one chip.

    You're just not supposed to be out of the game before you really are out of chips. Of course there will be sidepots like in any other all in situation when someone does not have enough to pay BB.

    26. Martie 2009, 16:46:54
    Bwild 
    Subiectul: Re:
    Fencer:the term "all in" comes to mind

    26. Martie 2009, 16:46:12
    Bwild 
    Subiectul: Re:
    puupia:I agree...I've won tournaments after being down to 5 chips.....chip and a chair

    26. Martie 2009, 16:45:46
    Fencer 
    Subiectul: Re:
    puupia: Why should you be allowed to play if you don't have at least BB number of chips?

    26. Martie 2009, 16:44:04
    puupia 
    Subiectul: Re:
    Fencer: I'd say there are two critical issues in no limit poker:

    1. Sometimes betting order goes out of whack in the first betting round.
    2. You can't raise all-in if you have less than bb chips. Also you'll be kicked out of table for not having enough to play if you don't have atleast as many chips as bb.

    With low blinds these are just annoying, but with bigger ones it becomes a real issue. These certainly have to be fixed before tournamet play is introduced. In late stages of tournament blinds will be so big that these bugs could have serious effects on the outcome of the tournament.

    26. Martie 2009, 16:41:32
    Bwild 
    Modificat de Bwild (26. Martie 2009, 16:42:07)
    <a href="Board?bc=58832">Czech/Raise</a>


    any ideas why this link doesnt work?

    26. Martie 2009, 16:32:41
    Fencer 
    Subiectul: Re:Furthermore, I am busy with something else at the moment,
    Bwild: That will be a followup.

    26. Martie 2009, 16:30:22
    Bwild 
    Subiectul: Re:Furthermore, I am busy with something else at the moment,
    Fencer: I hope its tournament play for fellowships

    26. Martie 2009, 14:24:10
    Czuch 
    Subiectul: Re:
    Fencer: No, you are correct, there are no critical problems with the limit and no limits, but the pot limits are not configured correctly, and it has affected everyone, just some people dont realize it and other people dont use the boards or bug reports.

    I guess any other features IE more options like advanced play out of turn buttons or standing up without losing your seat, will be a long wait if ever?

    26. Martie 2009, 07:23:14
    Fencer 
    Subiectul: Re:
    Modificat de Fencer (26. Martie 2009, 07:23:32)
    Czuch: There is nothing to comment yet. My local tests show that pot limit poker is OK and if something wrong happened recently, I hope you can imagine how difficult and complicated it is to reproduce such situations and pinpoint possible problem sources.
    Furthermore, I am busy with something else at the moment, so you must be patient and wait. As far as I know, the majority of users has no problems with limit and no limit poker here, so I can say that there is no critical issue which would require my immediate attention.

    26. Martie 2009, 03:06:23
    Czuch 
    hey fenser, not much comment from you at all lately? It would be helpful to get some input on the bugs/problems and suggestions, just to know where we stand on some of the issues, thanks!

    25. Martie 2009, 22:01:51
    Czuch 
    yeah, just tried it again, no matter what I bet it always came up 20

    other people claimed the same problems too

    << <   5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14   > >>
    Data şi ora
    Prieteni în direct
    Jocurile favorite
    Frãţiile
    Ştirea zilei
    Drept de copiere © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, toate drepturile rezervate.
    Înapoi la Început de paginã