Nume utilizator: Parolã:
Înregistrare utilizator nou
Moderator: SueQ , coan.net 
 Backgammon

Backgammon and variants.

Backgammon Links


Mesaje pe paginã:
Lista posturilor afişate
Nu eşti autorizat sã scrii pe acest panou.Pentru a putea adãuga mesaje trebuie sã ai nivelul de (0)
Mod: Toatã lumea poate afişa
Cautã între posturi:  

<< <   1 2   > >>
10. Iulie 2005, 19:11:00
danoschek 
Subiectul: webtv even stores
user cookies on their central server, which makes it
almost usable for serious purposes like my private
hide cookie, noting 51 new msgs, showing 10 indeed. ~*~

5. Iulie 2005, 21:11:39
danoschek 
Subiectul: Re:
Pedro Martínez: *PLOP* ... although
imitation is the sincerest form of flattery
I just don't have the time to return all love. ~*~

5. Iulie 2005, 20:54:01
danoschek 
Subiectul: Re:
Modificat de danoschek (5. Iulie 2005, 21:09:13)
frolind: sometimes it's due to judge "the maniacs" mildly.
perhaps someone is going for the record-amount of moves
for the day and just doesn't want to leave out a count ... ... ~*~

5. Iulie 2005, 01:35:43
danoschek 
Subiectul: roflol
the computer is the answer !!!
errrm - what exactly was the question ?? ... ~*~

2. Iulie 2005, 23:32:17
danoschek 
Subiectul: consequences irrelevant
Modificat de danoschek (2. Iulie 2005, 23:34:45)
but what preliminaries have let one getting on two's enemy list. . I have faced so
many surprised on boards where you have to wait for a first vent to hide as well, but
since I'm a prophet I use block well even before the troublemaker starts it as forseen ... ~*~

30. Iunie 2005, 21:04:49
danoschek 
Subiectul: Re: highest die first ?
Modificat de danoschek (30. Iunie 2005, 21:07:39)
bumble: nonsense - if you get anyone to that courtesy, congrats though
- but for me it's just a silly interpretation not covered by rules whatsoever
that's why I don't claim the adults-rule for moving pieces out, either - who cares ... ~*~

30. Iunie 2005, 04:33:23
danoschek 
Subiectul: good sportsmanship my butt
Modificat de danoschek (30. Iunie 2005, 04:34:48)
if I cAn shoot a goal and that is the goal of the game, I'd be stupid not to do so - your
belief is inessential here & even about rules there are divergences - like the very silly kindergarten move-out, "internationally" allowed, anything but sportsmanship for pros. ~*~

30. Iunie 2005, 04:01:14
danoschek 
Subiectul: funny after you confessed having no idea
Modificat de danoschek (30. Iunie 2005, 04:02:54)
if you do not have a minimum of style either, you better
should not talk in public altogether ... welcome on my
hidelist and - read the rules before your next spamming ... ~*~

30. Iunie 2005, 03:49:41
danoschek 
Subiectul: sorry
from the principle I do not give hints
on games yet in progress ... good luck ... ~*~

30. Iunie 2005, 03:17:24
danoschek 
Subiectul: Re: Opinions Please on Hypergammon
wayney: a known edge ... this nifty feature here allows different
variations of socalled international rules - now that you know you may
wish to find a courtesy with your opponent before the game ... ... ~*~

27. Iunie 2005, 23:59:24
danoschek 
Subiectul: Re: Pedro Martínez:
Modificat de danoschek (28. Iunie 2005, 03:57:20)
a peninsula, south part german ... here the wikipedia entry about - my hometown kiel
outlines the fjord
between the sub-peninsulae schwansen and angeln - go figure what
lingo anglish ppl spoke - but the brits mis-spelled when we urged them to learn it ... ~*~

27. Iunie 2005, 11:55:17
danoschek 
Subiectul: Re: Hrqls:
ah ja .. .. well if you have socially aimed at me asking to repeat your msg please
(as I was so fascinated that it reduced to a colourful scrolleffect) it was uncensored
indeed after all. ... and if holland is gammon, then juetland is backgammon north. ~*~

25. Iunie 2005, 12:48:09
danoschek 
Subiectul: as if the sun would mind anyway
Modificat de danoschek (25. Iunie 2005, 12:49:56)
when the darkness is complaining again - it happens everyday and will
remain futile ... looking forward to some dogmatics suffering a very short circuit
when they need a draw to avoid a draw in an evennumber-games match ... ... ~*~

24. Iunie 2005, 19:33:09
danoschek 
Subiectul: a bit of fantasy
would enable ideas like putting all the mechanistic computer clubber
into a file for those interested in iterative boredom and put just a link here. ~*~

24. Iunie 2005, 17:20:29
danoschek 
Subiectul: Re: Hrqls:
Modificat de danoschek (25. Iunie 2005, 02:28:39)
... it merely was meant to expose blonde attitude of those obsessed by computers
meanwhile trying to program mankind to silly and unworthy machine standards, too
- not to generalize our nice frisk neighbourhood from south of texel to north of juetland ... ... ~*~

24. Iunie 2005, 17:12:25
danoschek 
Subiectul: Hrqls: yeah
Modificat de danoschek (24. Iunie 2005, 17:15:53)
even if liberty becomes ashcrofted and criminalized in some countries meanwhile
it will remain elementary and futile to fight it in the free world existing globally yet ... ~*~

24. Iunie 2005, 17:04:51
danoschek 
Subiectul: but we pinned down the flaw
Modificat de danoschek (24. Iunie 2005, 17:07:23)
we need a totalitarian system where the fantasyless ones spend 24/7 to
fight creativity and a totally blonde tournament creator to find something
objectable whatsoever finally in the provenly great option of a draw ... . ~*~

24. Iunie 2005, 17:01:35
danoschek 
Subiectul: awww softwaremaster 1000 claiming cheats
Modificat de danoschek (24. Iunie 2005, 17:01:52)
too funny - irrigardlessly I described a different situtation in which a draw doesn't
harm anyone unlike in the perverted form that comes on his mind as first (funny too)
soon draws will be criminal sure. lacking fantasy cAn get a sickness if so notorious I say ~*~

23. Iunie 2005, 19:35:00
danoschek 
Subiectul: sometimes it's better to hide severed silliness
Modificat de danoschek (24. Iunie 2005, 00:07:21)
before it just stresses my patience or universe-outreaching tolerance granting everyone
to be happy even without the obvious thrills and benefits of a draw as described earlier
any attempts to make lacking fantasy obligatory are ridiculous and abnominal of course ~*~

23. Iunie 2005, 14:13:05
danoschek 
Subiectul: Re:
Chessmaster1000: lacking fantasy is
bad enough - but iterated it is just boring ... ~*~

23. Iunie 2005, 13:14:20
danoschek 
Subiectul: awww all going silly
so you are excused too - I for my part enjoy
players with a bit more of fantasy though ...
have a blessed week ... ~*~ . -- silly

23. Iunie 2005, 12:51:25
danoschek 
Subiectul: that's not the point
the point could be in an 8-games match when you
won 5 already, why bother on, rest draw over ... . ~*~

23. Iunie 2005, 12:41:05
danoschek 
Subiectul: as proven below
a draw is very acceptable and senseful. e.g. your opponent offers draw,
you accept because you forsee to lose this set in a bg match - half a point.
for players with a bit of fantasy that effect is half a cube too ... . ~*~

23. Iunie 2005, 12:32:22
danoschek 
Subiectul: WhiteTower: Re: draw possible
Modificat de danoschek (23. Iunie 2005, 12:38:12)
e.g. to win a tournament when the other has no chance anymor hence just wants out ...
and in matches with a fixed, even amount of games a draw will always be possible -
taking a draw in a set of a bg match may even gain the thrill of the lacking cube ... ~*~

23. Iunie 2005, 10:45:52
danoschek 
Subiectul: match rating is an important detail
Modificat de danoschek (23. Iunie 2005, 10:50:47)
because it enables you to create staged handicap challenges
in those gametypes with one clearly advantaged colour ... ... ~*~

23. Iunie 2005, 10:24:26
danoschek 
Subiectul: Re: win and lose against the same player
alanback: you noticed right ... but why
change ? else a match would make no difference ?
appointing amount of points/games provides liberty ... . ~*~

22. Iunie 2005, 15:54:16
danoschek 
Subiectul: no of course it is no flaw
Modificat de danoschek (22. Iunie 2005, 15:54:36)
unlike the players who play on draw.
(lil poem) ~*~

22. Iunie 2005, 13:11:33
danoschek 
Subiectul: you found an edge
Modificat de danoschek (22. Iunie 2005, 13:12:40)
pros indeed trim timing of resign according to the little difference ... ~*~

22. Iunie 2005, 01:12:12
danoschek 
Subiectul: okay - inessential difference
whoo hoo. 30 - 40 would have made it worth an objection
still the same dimension thus and not at all touching
the core of the sense. checked a year ago last time btw ... ~*~

22. Iunie 2005, 00:16:28
danoschek 
Subiectul: another detail
which has no impact in backgammon - some game types aren't that crowded ...
in small pente I am so far ahead, there are only 3-4 players within 400 points
- still I bother to play for a team to be available sometimes after all ... ~*~

21. Iunie 2005, 23:10:13
danoschek 
Subiectul: Re: Sitting pretty at the top
alanback: absolutely correct. a diligent player (stable rating)
won't lose more than 8 points to an opponent withing the 400 points range ... ~*~

21. Iunie 2005, 19:05:18
danoschek 
Subiectul: I take crazy as compliment
aware of all those normal and self-declaredly reasonable default characters ... ~*~

21. Iunie 2005, 17:42:21
danoschek 
Subiectul: I am just thankful
for the hide function protecting me from the sillliest ideas after all ... ... ~*~

21. Iunie 2005, 15:27:47
danoschek 
Subiectul: recent rating
should be only an additional value - why punish serious players who play continuously ?
irrigardlessly a penalty rating for inactive players seems reasonable after a while,
let's say 100 down after 3 months not giving a flying stuff at challenges ... ~*~

18. Iunie 2005, 03:56:47
danoschek 
Subiectul: for me
robos trying to imitate humans are still understandable
while humans somersualting after machines seem a bit silly ... ~*~

14. Iunie 2005, 22:27:52
danoschek 
Subiectul: who ever yet dares to think by his own
and is not more than 300 below my ratings, feel free also to invite me
- we could have a nice comment exchange which my pleasance forbids here ... ~*~

13. Iunie 2005, 08:17:01
danoschek 
Subiectul: backgammon program
. - if I may determine the rolls for my opponent, I'd certainly need
good software to make the probability of all my winning unconspicious ... ... ~*~

24. Mai 2005, 00:21:23
danoschek 
Subiectul: alanback:
and you learned also that we have a lift-off each elevator malfunction I bet ... ~*~

24. Mai 2005, 00:12:21
danoschek 
Subiectul: Re: Miles and backgammon and newbees knowing it all
Modificat de danoschek (24. Mai 2005, 00:15:31)
alanback: that's neglectable - go figure some ppl even think
200 years of anti-royal sulking would make a nation already ... ... ~*~

23. Mai 2005, 22:05:05
danoschek 
Subiectul: remember the oldie but goldie suggestion
Modificat de danoschek (23. Mai 2005, 22:30:35)
that newbees should have an approbation time and completed some games
before they get the privilege of unveiling what they are here for, on the boards .
check also my prophecy from 2ds ago on mem-only, advising how to set up filters . .. ~*~

23. Mai 2005, 21:29:38
danoschek 
Subiectul: I'd like to point at some good bg music 0:)
http://www.zerlett.de/uc.htm
The Unknown Cases . . "Stop The Madness" from the album 'Cuba' ... ~*~ .

23. Mai 2005, 20:46:59
danoschek 
Subiectul: oh well
Modificat de danoschek (23. Mai 2005, 20:48:55)
after you started your msg by misquoting
I didn't see it worthwhile reading entirely.
on the 2nd day already on blocked and hide, great ~*~

22. Mai 2005, 01:30:08
danoschek 
Subiectul: it's idle debating
I shall comply with the rules of the tournament I choose to sign up for - very easy.
and although it's almost alienmath for me to make milespergallon from liters per
hundred kilometers I shall do it whenever an american friend needs a favour. ~*~

22. Mai 2005, 01:06:35
danoschek 
Subiectul: oh well
some call even 'miles' standard - but even iterative insisting won't make it true. ~*~

22. Mai 2005, 00:32:05
danoschek 
Subiectul: as mentioned
I derogate that so called standard ...
here you got to play according to our standard rules or
to stay out of the standard tournaments - fully free choice. ~*~

20. Mai 2005, 22:03:19
danoschek 
Subiectul: and yet to clarify
Modificat de danoschek (20. Mai 2005, 22:03:54)
the anti-fiddling rule about highest triangle counts not earlier than
you removed your first piece ... you may freely arrange the house until
you decide to move out - but from that moment on, sorting is required ... ~*~

20. Mai 2005, 21:59:11
danoschek 
Subiectul: Re: alanback:
Modificat de danoschek (20. Mai 2005, 22:27:36)
yeah that's exactly what I have been suggesting since two years - btw faced just
worthless babbling back from the same pertinent source as latestly - won't control now if
again he used his default insults calling everybody with some fantasy moron or paranoic
~*~

20. Mai 2005, 21:38:02
danoschek 
Subiectul: Re: alanback:
hehehe - could be ... for me it was surprising how little it's known in the states,
since we all play that way and our main minority the turks use to use the same rules ... :)
it levels the disadvantage of the backhold strategy compared to 'fast' and 'blockade' ~*~

20. Mai 2005, 21:30:11
danoschek 
Subiectul: Re: alanback:
Modificat de danoschek (20. Mai 2005, 21:30:30)
nope that's okay - but if you have five checkers 3x on 5, 1x on 3 and 1x on 2
and roll 5/1 then you take 5 out once but must not make the others safe by moving 3-2 ...
still 5 is the highest triangle and you have to move from there i.e. 5-4 - no fiddling. ~*~

20. Mai 2005, 21:20:33
danoschek 
Subiectul: alanback: yes
Modificat de danoschek (20. Mai 2005, 21:21:48)
basically it's what I mean. you may choose which of the dice to use first freely, no need
to bother with hypothetical impossibilities later, that's just part of the game. moving only
from the topmost triangle means AFTER you started moving out stones from the board- ~*~

<< <   1 2   > >>
Data şi ora
Prieteni în direct
Jocurile favorite
Frãţiile
Ştirea zilei
Drept de copiere © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, toate drepturile rezervate.
Înapoi la Început de paginã