Spelersnaam: Wachtwoord:
Registratie voor nieuwe spelers
Toezichthouder: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Berichten per pagina:
Forumlijst
U hebt geen toestemming om berichten op dit forum achter te laten. Het minimaal vereiste lidmaatschap om berichten op dit forum achter te mogen laten is Brain Pion.
Modus: Iedereen kan berichten achterlaten
Zoek in berichten:  

<< <   1 2 3 4 5   > >>
3. december 2004, 03:32:28
Purple 
Just change it. A long as it's not obscene or taken it goes right through.

30. november 2004, 21:05:07
Purple 
WTG Rooster. Now that is something to crow about.

30. november 2004, 01:09:55
Purple 
OK Flooz but it's fairly good natured up to now. :)

26. november 2004, 03:13:35
Purple 
When someone is in trouble there are always people who fancy themselves a Roman Emperor to give thumbs up or thumbs down. Maybe it inflates their own self-importance. This seems like a Brainking related topic Flooz..enforcement of site guidelines. If you think it isn't then I will drop it.

26. november 2004, 02:32:31
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re: This board
Slam is Brainking.

26. november 2004, 01:39:10
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re:
No one is going to rat him out

26. november 2004, 01:32:13
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re:
Only Fencer knows how long the ban is for. He can re-instate him tomorrow and no one will think he was over lenient.

25. november 2004, 18:47:55
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re:
Amnesty International

25. november 2004, 18:27:05
Purple 
I would like to suggest and request than Slam be re-instated on the grounds that one..he is really sorry and won't do it again and two..others have done similar or worse and not suffered the same consequences. I think the deterrant effect has been served. Just my opinion.

25. november 2004, 00:36:52
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re:
Go to membership on your main page. It explains it. I think a 6 months Rook is $20..could be wrong because that Euro is too damned complicated.

25. november 2004, 00:29:06
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re:
Rook or Knight? Rook is much the best bargain IMHO

17. november 2004, 17:09:18
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re: bad words
Ok Bwild..I assume you used lighter fluid. Now step two. Light up a cigar.

17. november 2004, 16:52:48
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re: bad words
I recommend gargling with lighter fluid or bleach for Bwildman. :0)

17. november 2004, 16:44:30
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re:
I don't think Fencer banned Slam for bad language and now is going to turn around and let others start using it.

16. november 2004, 13:43:47
Purple 
Bad try. Fencer is able to check everything anyone sends including me. Think of something else.

9. november 2004, 21:33:47
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re:
Case of guts from Ugh

4. november 2004, 21:31:58
Purple 
I notice some Halma players have drawn games. How can a game of Halma possibly draw?

4. november 2004, 00:13:19
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re: Hmmmm?...board moderating?
RANTS and RAVES

3. november 2004, 04:01:26
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re:
Well said Long John

2. november 2004, 17:13:50
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re:
Sure but it hasn't gotten Slam restored yet.

2. november 2004, 17:10:06
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re:
These are attempted posts by hidden users. They are hidden for extreme pornography an are still trying to post.

31. oktober 2004, 21:24:24
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re: Jokes
Look again. My webtv is very slow

31. oktober 2004, 18:08:03
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re: Re:
In the Navy at Officer's Candidate School during brigade drill many of us were told we were slower than Hogan's Goat. Everybody pretended like they knew what it meant. It has to mean something. :)

31. oktober 2004, 18:01:34
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re:
Old people know it. LOL. (American saying)

31. oktober 2004, 17:57:15
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re:
My webtv is slower than Hogan's goat. All three sites.

30. oktober 2004, 16:30:01
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re: Happy Halloween
I was thinking of dressing up as a cowboy but that is so lame. :P

30. oktober 2004, 16:17:24
Purple 
Onderwerp: Happy Halloween
The 120 members of Purple World wish a Happy Halloween to all those who celebrate it.

27. oktober 2004, 17:40:29
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re: Interview with....
Aangepast door Purple (27. oktober 2004, 20:42:38)
[edited]

23. oktober 2004, 16:14:21
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re: IMupChucKing
Kevin is solid and has been all along.

21. oktober 2004, 21:44:06
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re:
But now Brainking has a new generation of bad boys which gives meaning to the empty lives of the bullies who love to have someone to use to get the attention off of themselves. LOL

21. oktober 2004, 21:37:53
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re:
Aangepast door Purple (21. oktober 2004, 22:40:22)
..of which you knew nothing. AS IF

21. oktober 2004, 21:25:31
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re:
Hey the KM only did that to predators, programmers and pedophiles. And only then when we saw one of those going in for the kill.

17. oktober 2004, 00:16:01
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re:
You are right Red. It doesn't matter too much. Thanks.

17. oktober 2004, 00:09:03
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re:
There isn't much consistancy. Purple World is listed in Fav's and Fellowship columns but Politics R Us only in fellowship column. I never checked or unchecked anything ever.

12. oktober 2004, 22:36:06
Purple 
More than just them. Besides they haven't left the site.

12. oktober 2004, 19:22:33
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re:
Some are so obvious there are fingerprints all over them. And they are all screened by some lonely people to see if lost love has somehow reappeared. Leads to paranoia and illusions and the best advice is to get other obsessions.

12. oktober 2004, 19:09:04
Purple 
Bad guesswork. :)

12. oktober 2004, 18:08:15
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re: multiple ID's
Fencer could just delete them and that would also end groundless speculation and false accusations.

12. oktober 2004, 14:38:17
Purple 
sadly

11. oktober 2004, 16:44:19
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re:
You can make someone go away by using the hide feature and there is no need to call them out unless you get some pleasure by piling on.

6. oktober 2004, 02:20:50
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re:
Not stevie!!! LOL

28. september 2004, 22:22:47
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re:
Barnum and Bailey perhaps?

28. september 2004, 03:47:50
Purple 
Onderwerp: Very Widespread
A checker player just complained of the same red X's. Has to be an internal problem.

23. september 2004, 01:02:31
Purple 
The KM did not authorize Glenda's cybering. Strictly a stevie idea. The reason is known to him alone. :)

23. september 2004, 00:55:31
Purple 
Glenda was not a KM operative

23. september 2004, 00:39:28
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re:
We had no one who could beat you Ed

22. september 2004, 21:57:10
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re: Re: BBW
Yes, stevie's memory seems accurate. LOL

22. september 2004, 21:53:38
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re:
Aangepast door Purple (22. september 2004, 21:55:25)
Some of our auxilliaries didn't have a KM tag so if you played much checkers there was probably a report on you but it may have been just a one liner..i.e. "likes to chat," "plays single corner" or "weak end game" etc. If you had much of a rating we took a closer look.

22. september 2004, 21:39:50
Purple 
Onderwerp: Re:
Oh my..these were the bad old days of course..Public Relations, Recruiting, Game Analysis, Opposition Research (500 names in the database) Top Guns Task Force, Ratings Monitor Detachment, plus our Pervert Busting Team where someone would disguise as a female and play known cyber guys..then reveal themelves at games end. Some cyber dudes were never heard from again. I can't remember everything. That was a year ago.

22. september 2004, 21:28:30
Purple 
Onderwerp: Ratings Fallacy
Aangepast door Purple (22. september 2004, 21:29:32)
Not proud of this but The KM Covert Operations Dept. would occasionally torpedo some arogant hi rated dude by sending in a suicide bomber (often rigged up with a program) who would start a game with say a 2000 rating and..before finishing the game with the target..would tank 7-8 games in a row so the rating would be more like 1400. Then arrogant guy would lose to a 1400 player and take a major ratings hit. This was only done to predatory players but it didn't make it right. It is one example however of how ratings should be taken with a grain of salt.

<< <   1 2 3 4 5   > >>
Datum en tijd
Aanwezige vrienden
Favoriete Forums
Genootschappen
Tip van de dag
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, alle rechten voorbehouden.
Terug naar boven