 |
|
 BrainKing.comBoard for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future. If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider). World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
21. January 2009, 18:15:46 Subject: Re: Latest poll: "Do you want anonymous visitors profile statistic?" rabbitoid: Can somebody explain to me - What are anonymous vistors? - What kind of profile statistics do they have? 3. January 2009, 11:45:25 Subject: Re: coan.net: What about an opinion poll regarding the castle layout and this flying dragon? 13. October 2008, 22:00:31 Subject: Re: Advertising in Tip of the day Fencer: I see. Can everybody place a tip like this? 13. October 2008, 19:05:32 Subject: Advertising in Tip of the day The tip of the day #31 by TexasCalculatem is not really a tip related to BrainKing, but pure advertising. I feel, that that is not the right place for it. 22. March 2007, 09:16:05 Subject: Re: no flags in new layout Fencer: The links are underlined in the left and in the main part of the main page, but not in the right. emmett: Maybe most users never change the language, but for translators it is very important to have the possibility of easy switching them. I think that the simple mode should have the same functionality as the castle. 21. March 2007, 21:25:42 Subject: no flags in new layout I miss the flags for language switching in the simple and no fonts layout of the main page. Furthermore there is no link indication on the right side of the screen, e.g. for fellowships. At least that is inconsistent to the menu on the left. For the castle layout this is ok. I hope, this will be changed for simple and no fonts layout before the official release of them. 18. January 2007, 09:04:11 Subject: Re: no time-outs Fencer: In my opinion unlimited games should always be unrated, and both of the players should be able to delete them anytime. 14. January 2007, 11:58:27 Subject: Re: Dice Chess MadMonkey: I have noticed the same annoying necessary to move the king. And just that detail is the reason for my voting to change the rules. A new variant will lead sooner or later to a situation, that the old variant wouldn't be played anymore. Btw., how would you explain the differences between the two variants to the average player? 14. January 2007, 11:45:29 Subject: Re: Dice Chess Modified by ghardh (14. January 2007, 11:46:38) MadMonkey: How should the probabilities be affected, if there are already pieces captured? I think, if there are e.g. 2 pawns captured, there should be a ratio of 6:1 instead of 8:1. And why this should be a new game? The changes would be minor enough (most players wouldn't notice them), that they should affect the current version. 14. January 2007, 11:26:05 Subject: Re: Dice Chess MadMonkey: It's not necessary, to have a more-than-6-sided die, but, I think, it would be a good idea, to have the probabilities weighted this way. That means, it would be 8 times more probable to roll a "1" than a "6", and 2 times more probable to roll a "2", "3" or "4" than "5" or "6". What do you think? Another question according this game: Is it possible to castle or to capture en passant, if the die and the usual chess rules allow it? 26. January 2006, 18:16:01 Subject: Statistics I've noticed, that the list of the best players regarding the sum of their established ratings is calculated including games in which the player has been inactive during the last 6 months.
Is that really intended? Wouldn't it be better to exclude such games (as done for the game specific lists of best players)? I would also wonder, whether Pools should count for this list. 8. September 2005, 21:38:34 Subject: Re: Non paying members disadvantages Fencer: Those rating graphs are a very important feature of BK. Make sure, that the non paying members are aware, what they are missing. 8. September 2005, 21:30:32 Subject: Non paying members disadvantages Is it true that non paying members are not able to see the rating graphes of their opponents?
Are they able to see the icons? 4. June 2005, 15:26:33 Subject: Re: cloak? Andersp: "Cloak" seemed to me strange, too. (But, my opinion should not count in this matter, because I'm no English man). - For Esperanto I translated it with "hidden mode".
Btw., at first it seemed strange to me, why I should see, what my opponents are just doing. Then I thought it over, and now I compare it with a tournament room, where everybody can watch each other. - So, I have no reason to use the cloak mode. My secrets are outside of this room. ;-) So 20. May 2005, 20:50:15 Subject: Re: Esperanto Fencer: Thanks, Fencer! :)
It's a pleasure to work with the BrainKing translation tool! 20. May 2005, 19:21:25 Subject: Re: Pedro Martínez: It's a green flag with a white rectangle area containing a green star.
- The translator is already able to see it! - :) 20. May 2005, 18:46:12 Subject: Re: Esperanto Rose: You are exactly right! :)
There are about a million people in the world that are familiar with this language. There are existing thousands of books, e.g. So I think, there may be a few Esperanto friends on this site, too, that would be happy to be able to use their favourite language here. 20. May 2005, 18:30:50 Subject: Esperanto I am currently translating BrainKing into Esperanto.
About 70% of the task is already done. It will be available to the public in a few weeks, I think. Is there anybody interested in helping me to finish this task or to review the already translated texts? Ĉu iu povas helpi? |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |