(back)
User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   1 2 3 4 5 6 7   > >>
26. December 2005, 18:14:30
Mort 
Subject: Re:
Modified by Mort (26. December 2005, 18:15:20)
heavenlyemma: Not sure I can do anything, as I gave him some sugar after he gave me some. I'm not sure if that would be deemed egging him on.

17. December 2005, 12:42:57
Mort 
My missus heavenlyemma (ID 1131) bought me 6 months membership as a Christmas present.
She's yet to get credited her brains.

Not that she hasn't got any brains

23. November 2005, 02:39:59
Mort 
Subject: Re: picture
crotalus: Only paying members can have icons and photos associated with their BrainKing accounts. The required size is 40x50 points (icon) or 200x300 points (photo on a Profile page) in jpg format. If you want to add or change your pictures, please send them to info@brainking.com along with your user ID.

21. November 2005, 17:54:42
Mort 
Subject: Re: What has happened ?
SMIRF Engine: Ours is fine. No changes or anything out of the blue with that program.

6. November 2005, 19:03:45
Mort 
Subject: Re: Stairs-Ladders
Dryznik: You remember wrong. You could only play a maximum of 4 games in any one ladder and you were limited to playing those within a certain limit on the ladder.

4. November 2005, 13:00:27
Mort 
Subject: Re: memberships
Pioneer54: I've set a max to how many games I'll start so I don't run into that problem.

My players don't usually have to wait for anymore then 2 days for me to move.

3. November 2005, 21:24:18
Mort 
Subject: Re: Stairs games
Pioneer54: Buy Rook membership, you don't have to worry about limitations then.

17. September 2005, 16:18:53
Mort 
Shhh, I might get a buyer!!

I know..

17. September 2005, 15:32:53
Mort 
I've got a dome in London for sale.. hardly used, prime river front property..

.. Only £100,000,000

27. August 2005, 15:27:03
Mort 
.. Yeah he was supposed to be the "Arch Moderator"

1. August 2005, 15:26:10
Mort 
Not all the Mods want to join the Mod Squad, so it can't be done that way. And you CAN'T force Mods to join.

1. August 2005, 14:34:42
Mort 
Subject: Re:
bwildman: That's more work for Fencer.. we'll never get to see Pro Gammon!!

1. August 2005, 13:23:19
Mort 
Subject: Re:
ClayNashvilleTn: Yeah I remeber something like that once.. People were leaving because they weren't being paid enough.

The bosses doubled wages and the staff stayed.

1. August 2005, 13:12:58
Mort 
Your gonna get some that won't renew as a matter of course.

1. August 2005, 13:07:41
Mort 
Uh! Why then is paid membership increasing?

30. July 2005, 13:29:25
Mort 
Subject: Re:
ClayNashvilleTn: Kinda?

30. July 2005, 13:28:45
Mort 
lol .. Only if your going for the record and don't leave your seat.

30. July 2005, 13:25:54
Mort 
Subject: Re:
myfanwy: A few milliseconds difference?

30. July 2005, 13:24:04
Mort 
More then twice lol.. but this is getting.

30. July 2005, 13:15:39
Mort 
Subject: Re:
ClayNashvilleTn: Jules is ALWAYS right, you should remember that!! *ducks*

30. July 2005, 13:11:24
Mort 
It's Blazing without an upgraded membership Clay, apart from minor glitches this site is always fast!!

28. July 2005, 12:53:33
Mort 
Oh well!!

28. July 2005, 12:48:08
Mort 
Is BK being a bit sluggish now, or do I need to reset my PC?

18. July 2005, 23:19:43
Mort 
Subject: Re:
ArtfulDodger: The Flame Pit is not the cave, the cave was brought back... it was unbanned.

18. July 2005, 10:02:22
Mort 
Subject: Re: resign as a mod in a fellowship
Hrqls: The big boss has to remove you.. I think.

17. July 2005, 22:28:09
Mort 
Who's frightened, where?

1. July 2005, 17:21:45
Mort 
Subject: Re:
pauloaguia: Yep. So it's bk then! Phew :)

1. July 2005, 17:18:24
Mort 
Is there a slight problem with BK at the mo, or do I need to reset the PC?

10. June 2005, 14:46:45
Mort 
Subject: Re: interested
furbster: Yes I think... I would, but robbing a bank could get me into trouble

10. June 2005, 01:13:32
Mort 
Subject: Re: It's kind of on topic
Walter Montego: International law covers even Fencers homeland I would have thought.

10. June 2005, 00:38:41
Mort 
Subject: Re: It's kind of on topic
Walter Montego: It starts getting into libel and slander territory. It'd be hard to prove, but is it work the risk for Fencer.

9. June 2005, 21:56:15
Mort 
Yes.

9. June 2005, 21:48:59
Mort 
Subject: Re: I'll be saying my goodbyes soon
morphy4ever: Yes.

If you don't believe me ask one of your friends. I'm sure at least one of them knows.

.. Oh yes, I forgot.. A politness rating system that is supposed to stop the worst which is abused by asking players for votes. Hence, people who would of got a life long ban from here still roam that site.

9. June 2005, 20:05:05
Mort 
Subject: Re: I'll be saying my goodbyes soon
Modified by Mort (9. June 2005, 20:13:40)
Cranky Franky: Yeah right, pull the other one it's got bells on it.

You forgot to mention the flaming, name calling, harrasement and other poo that goes on on the IYT boards. Not to mention that some send constant complaints into IYT so when the serious complaints get sent in they are ignored. Not that Pat Chu listens to his members much anyway... unless they threaten him.

That doesn't happen here.


9. June 2005, 11:02:12
Mort 
Subject: Re:
farmer sam: I've got me Acme personality wipe/install kit.

9. June 2005, 10:51:37
Mort 
I'll use Marvin lol

7. June 2005, 00:07:55
Mort 
Subject: Re:a REAL good backgammon program can help a lot, especially not so experienced players.
ClayNashvilleTn: No, because position can demand that you ignore what he might roll. Only maybe in 6 or 7 turns may I be interested and only if he drops a free one that I can knock off.

7. June 2005, 00:01:19
Mort 
Subject: Re:a REAL good backgammon program can help a lot, especially not so experienced players.
ClayNashvilleTn: Backgammon is also about position building blocks and many other things, whether it's better to move the back counters, to leave them them there, whether to make a run, etc.

6. June 2005, 23:58:09
Mort 
Subject: Re:a REAL good backgammon program can help a lot, especially not so experienced players.
ClayNashvilleTn: We are not talking about Craps, we are talking about Backgammon.

6. June 2005, 23:48:34
Mort 
Subject: Re:
ClayNashvilleTn: Clay there are Powerful programs that can defeat the top Backgammon players out there... This is a fact.

They are not free mind you :)

6. June 2005, 23:33:33
Mort 
Subject: Re:
philip: Not as much if you are using a program if nothing at all really as the person cheating has not done the work. But.. on the other hand if you beat someone who is cheating. :)

6. June 2005, 23:20:43
Mort 
Subject: Re:
philip: From what I read he gets a neural net program that learns by playing against itself.

And yes, I did post more info, but I thought best not to in the end.

6. June 2005, 23:12:47
Mort 
Subject: Re:
harley: No a program that is trained to play the dice in the best fashion in backgammom would help... But it spoils the fun of playing the game.

6. June 2005, 17:50:26
Mort 
Subject: Re:
ClayNashvilleTn: Clay, you don't know how I think. BBW has cleared up the matter.

6. June 2005, 17:48:52
Mort 
Subject: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: Thankyou BBW for your explaining the situation more clearly.

6. June 2005, 17:17:26
Mort 
Subject: Re:
ClayNashvilleTn: No-ones doubting that he deserved moderation. but what the moderation was for was minor. An editing/deletion of the post with a pm'd warning would have worked... The person involved does listen, and if he'd not stopped then hiding does the job, then if he'd not stopped then ban him.

The rules are there over how we moderate for a reason.

6. June 2005, 16:57:36
Mort 
Subject: Re:
Modified by Mort (6. June 2005, 16:58:26)
ClayNashvilleTn:



If a post does not fall into the site guidelines, the moderator should:
Edit post for content if rest of the post belongs in the board.
Remove the post if none of the post belongs in the board.
Warn user IN PRIVATE about edited/removed post, and point them to guidelines if needed.
If multiple users are engaged in a flame war, a public post saying "stop" can be used.
If posting continues after a warning, the poster should be hidden for at least a few hours, possibly longer (24 hours or more).
If after being unhidden a poster continues, then a ban of the user can be used.
Moderators are free to take more strict or less strict actions as needed, but should try to follow the above guideline when possible.

6. June 2005, 16:47:17
Mort 
Subject: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: "but I can tell you that it was more then just a "SINGLE word" that lead us to our actions."

Thing is BBW, those other words concerned only came in after the person was hidden for one word which the same moderator the other night just asked another person to edit out.

One person is being treated one way for a minor thing and another is treated differently. If the person was asked to remove the word and refused and then after being hid then carried on I could understand the actions taken.

28. May 2005, 10:37:01
Mort 
Subject: Re: Re:
Fencer: lol Ok. :)

27. May 2005, 22:12:00
Mort 
Subject: Re: Re:
Fencer: Ahhhh that explains why. Is it possible that it could show that there are messages on any board within that F/s like it use to please :)

<< <   1 2 3 4 5 6 7   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top