User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Chaos 
 Espionage

For all Espionage fans


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33   > >>
1. October 2004, 20:47:51
david upshaw 
Subject: Re:
I aggree. Pieces captured should be shown on the sides.

1. October 2004, 17:53:06
Kevin 
Yes, it seems to do that sometimes...i'm not quite sure why or when... :-)

1. October 2004, 16:17:31
grenv 
Modified by grenv (1. October 2004, 16:20:13)
<I think that the piece attacked should change to show the minimum value
e.g if I attack and lose with a 2 I should see >2 on the piece.

:)

The "less than" character at the beginning was added by the editor ???

29. September 2004, 08:48:03
harley 
We need taken/defeated pieces at the side. I can never remember what value piece I used for an attack. Half the time I can't even remember the last move I made!

29. September 2004, 04:01:48
WizardII 
No, otherwise I could use my 1's and 2's as spies by attacking pieces to see there value. The best you know is that the piece you attacked was higher than you or a bomb.

29. September 2004, 01:16:52
Thad 
Subject: after an attack...
After I attack an opponent's piece and lose, shouldn't I know the rank of that piece? Shouldn't the "?" be relplaced by the piece's actual value?

29. September 2004, 01:16:06
WizardII 
Regardless you should be able to attack any piece. That is not the same as taking it. After your move you will find out the result of the attacks.

28. September 2004, 20:51:27
DrRobinson 
I think you are right as well. I have not gotten that far in my game, but it is not right according to the rules :oD

28. September 2004, 19:11:19
harley 
No, I think you're right, thats what the rules say. I didn't take the piece, but the computer would have allowed it.

28. September 2004, 19:03:26
hellsfury74304 
Subject: Re:
could be a bug....the rules page says a spy can only take another spy or sapper......'course i could be wrong :)

28. September 2004, 18:56:07
harley 
I seem to be able to take a number 1 soldier with a spy - thats not right is it?

26. September 2004, 14:09:33
pauloaguia 
never mind... I just got the answer to my question :)
(they can't)

26. September 2004, 14:07:29
pauloaguia 
Subject: Question
So when it says "In standard Espionage, a player makes a move with two different pieces per turn" does it mean that the same piece can't be moved twice in the same turn?

<< <   24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top