 |
|
 CheckersDiscuss about checkers game or find new opponents. No insulting, baiting or flaming other players. Off topic posts are subject to deletion and if it persists the poster faces sanctions. This board is for checkers. You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 > >> 3. August 2005, 19:20:29 Subject: Re: Modified by Purple (4. August 2005, 15:41:01)  gooner: Any missing posts were removed by the poster. (unless a Global Mod came in)  6. August 2005, 07:46:29 Subject: Checkers 10 piece database 6. August 2005, 21:23:16 Subject: Maybe Obsolete Info 6. August 2005, 21:27:25 Subject: Re: Checkers 10 piece database Grim Reaper: Very impressive though the computer talk was way over my head. 6. August 2005, 23:53:00 Subject: Games Will players invite me to some checker games? 7. August 2005, 08:04:05 Modified by Grim Reaper (7. August 2005, 08:05:25) http://brainking.com/en/ShowGame?g=952957&i=16
I direct everyone's attention to the above position. After I made my move, my opponent, Ustica, made this remark to me in our game: ustica: ustica: (7. August 2005, 01:48:33) if i was white i do 24-28 not 1-6 you like publesh moves. oh well just my opion. On our board, 1-6 is g1-f2 and 24-28 is b6-a7. The move the "great" ustica is trying to tell me to play will lose. I am wondering, if he is so good, why doesn't he know this? Does he actually think he can persuade me to make a losing move. What a great champion he is. 7. August 2005, 08:11:58 Subject: Re: Grim Reaper: I was wonder if you use 3 program or just one. but hey! if you wanna win you gotta take chance. 7. August 2005, 08:15:48 Subject: Re: ustica:
Take a chance? Translation. Lie about the move and see if your opponent believes you. Sorry pal, one look at "24-28" (by the way, why did you say that instead of refer to the letters on the board on BrainKing? Oh, that's right, computer programs have numbers on them, don't they?) and I knew that was a losing move. 7. August 2005, 08:55:38 Subject: Re:  Grim Reaper: One look? I can stare at that move forever and don't see it as a losing one. I actually think it's not a bad move at all. 7. August 2005, 13:34:32 Subject: Re:  gooner: i agree. serial unposting should be a crime..! 7. August 2005, 14:48:39 Subject: One More Day- Request Invite 7. August 2005, 17:15:14 Subject: Re: Grim Reaper: As for the numeric notation, have you noticed this Settings page? 7. August 2005, 17:27:04 Does anybody else think that the "24-28" is not a losing move? 7. August 2005, 17:55:28 Subject: Re: Pedro Martínez: There could be a problem analyzing moves of a game in progress as tempting as it is. 7. August 2005, 18:12:24 Subject: Re: Pedro Martínez: If the chat gets more detailed and someone suggests a course of action for a next move or even a strategy then someone could yell "foul." Analyze away..I do..but be careful about the posting because we don't want to provide excuses. The game is one on one. 7. August 2005, 18:16:11 Subject: Re: Purple: I'm talking about a move that was NOT played. Trice didn't move that way. I don't care about the game they play right now, I want to discuss the "24-28" move. 7. August 2005, 18:20:50 Subject: Re: Pedro Martínez: It seems hard to discuss the move that was not made without bringing in the move that was and how future moves were/are impacted by that. 7. August 2005, 18:33:01 Excuse me but that's a total nonsense what you wrote. I want to discuss a theoretical game that has absolutely no connection to the game these two are playing since it's already a completely different game. All I want to figure out is if Trice would have lost the game if he had moved 9.b6-a7. That's it. Absolutely no connection whatsoever to the ongoing game. 7. August 2005, 18:37:23 Subject: Re: Pedro Martínez: If it looks like it is impacting THIS game your post will be deleted whether you think it is nonsense or not. 7. August 2005, 18:38:23 Does anybody else think that the "24-28" is not a losing move? 7. August 2005, 18:40:29 The piece that would have moved from 24 to 28 is now off the board, and cannot influence the play whatsoever.
That subgame, by defintion, cannot possibly occur in this game, since it is impossible to create any such position from the parent game with an extra piece on the board. 7. August 2005, 18:41:29 Pedro, if you do not think it is a losing move, challenge me to a rated game, and play it. I will play the other side. 7. August 2005, 18:44:09 Subject: Re: Grim Reaper: Fair offer. Do it that way. 7. August 2005, 18:44:59 Subject: Re: Grim Reaper: OK. Thanks. 7. August 2005, 19:21:25 For anyone interested, it's this game:
http://brainking.com/cz/ShowGame?g=967503 8. August 2005, 02:10:44 So, the game is over. Grim Reaper has won. Amazing how someone can predict a loss/win in 131 moves (I mean this). Congrats 8. August 2005, 03:11:12 Maybe Ed Trice is the greatest player in the world :) 8. August 2005, 03:48:18 Subject: Re: Pedro Martínez: WOW!!can predict 131 moves. must be the best. like in chess ,in 4 games was #1. WOW!! Congrats 8. August 2005, 03:52:09 Subject: Re: Socrates: I see a close game but I'll take Ustica and the points. LOL 8. August 2005, 03:58:29 Subject: Re: Grim Reaper: That was impressive by any standard. Thanks. 8. August 2005, 04:12:30 Subject: Re: Ustica and the points Grim Reaper: I can see one move ahead maybe..so what do I know? LOL. But I have played Ustica 100 times in the last 4 years with zero wins. As I said it looks like a close game. 8. August 2005, 04:16:36 Subject: Re: Ustica and the points Purple: how many times have you beat GR?
 8. August 2005, 05:28:37 Subject: Re: Ustica and the points Purple: where are u playing it bud 8. August 2005, 05:31:57 Congratulations on being the greatest online checkers player, Grim Reaper. 8. August 2005, 07:19:37 Subject: Re:  Socrates: Maybe he is a genius and no one wants to accept it.. haha..
He is a kewl dude actually.. he fools you all! :) Makes you think he is a meanie..  Hey Ed.. how's life? And I wonder why I don't play checkers with him.. haha8. August 2005, 13:28:47 Subject: Re: ScarletRose: isnt he just simply AmaZing??? LOL..I wonder if Purple is taking bets on the game of the century?
8. August 2005, 13:33:53 Subject: Re: Ustica and the points Grim Reaper: how many possible outcomes are there in a game of checkers?
I only ask you this,because I know you have written checker programs for several years now. 8. August 2005, 15:36:38 Subject: Re: Ustica and the points bwildman: There are three possible outcomes in a game of checkers. 8. August 2005, 15:40:13 Subject: Re: Ustica and the points Pedro Martínez: duh..LOL..my bad..I should have said"end games" 8. August 2005, 17:42:00 Subject: Re: Grim Reaper: Wow and Wow!!!!!! I had no ideal. :o) 8. August 2005, 17:51:09 Subject: Re: Pedro Martínez: 131 moves?
that game went 74..am I missing something? 8. August 2005, 18:01:57 Subject: Re: bwildman: He's most likely talking individual moves, and then only from the "losing move" they had been discussing. That way, 131 sounds about right.
There were 148 total moves in the game (74x2) and 131 moves back must have been the move in question. 8. August 2005, 18:04:18 Subject: Re: John Baker: that makes sense. 9. August 2005, 00:27:40 Subject: Re: Positions.. see.. what'd I tell ya!! haha.. you go boy!! whooo hooo.. 9. August 2005, 09:56:22 Subject: Re: Thought Puzzle Grim Reaper: I got 9 once against a little computer program, no move list... << < 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |