User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: SueQ , coan.net 
 Backgammon

Backgammon and variants.

Backgammon Links


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

12. September 2009, 06:44:02
spirit_66 
Subject: Re: I want to cheat!
coan.net:
I don't know!

11. September 2009, 17:56:37
spirit_66 
Subject: Re: I want to cheat!
pedestrian:
A program can give you the best moves!!!

6. August 2009, 07:51:37
spirit_66 
Subject: Re: DailyGammon
gogul:

----> <it's something for patient observation.>

Maybe with the help of a nice tool like GNU?

6. August 2009, 06:03:34
spirit_66 
Subject: Re: DailyGammon
playBunny:

Well, I'm also registered at DailyGammon but I stopped playing there. There's also the long delay between the moves which can be used for foul play.

I prefer FIBS and GammonSite.

5. August 2009, 04:44:26
spirit_66 
Subject: Re:
wetware:

I can't see this problem as easy as you can. It drives me nuts thinking about that such a rotter is fooling me.

I pay at BK for playing BG against human beings. Playing against bots I can do this on my PC with GNU, Jellyfish whatever for free.

I'm still thinking more and more if BK is a good place for playing BG. The long possible delays between the moves are provoking any kind of fraud or foul play.

I've to face so often that somebody delay immediately the game if the one is on the loosing street. For me this is also a kind of foul play.

At the moment I think it's better to play BG with the short time limit of not more then 3 minutes.

Well, still frustrated about the way it goes here.

4. August 2009, 11:18:42
spirit_66 
Subject: Re:
gogul:

Ooohhh! Now comes the man from Switzerland with the big potatoes!!!

You can believe me that I'm only frustrated about .. let's say .. opponents with sound games.

Hard for me not to believe that there's something going wrong when I can watch them at the already opened game and it takes a long time till they make their moves. What do you think they are doing? My proof is if the GNU analyse at the end of the match show me no fault. The top of all is if they have very luck dices too.

But I never complained about any unfair play of you!!!

4. August 2009, 09:56:49
spirit_66 
Subject: Re:
aaru:

OK!

4. August 2009, 09:51:47
spirit_66 
Subject: Re:
aaru:

Ok!!

What should I do now? Shoot myself to give you satisfaction?

4. August 2009, 09:39:37
spirit_66 
Subject: Re:
aaru:

I know the rule "in case of doubt not guilty".

4. August 2009, 09:24:38
spirit_66 
Subject: Re:
aaru:
I can!!! But if you're not, well then I apologize. How will I know that you're innocent???

4. August 2009, 05:51:24
spirit_66 
Subject: Re: interesting annotations
playBunny:

Well, interesting to read all the notes.

I'm talking about both, games and matches. I agree that it's always uncertain to judge on a small amount of events. Would be beneficial to have many games/matches for the analysis.

I also agree that I'm not free of prejudices when I'm alerted of a possible fraud.

I guess one can say that there are cheater on BrainKing and I also guess that we can't get rid of them.

So I'm asking myself if it's worthwhile to go on playing here and being somebodies fool or better to stop any activity on BrainKing? I still don't know but there's a big frustration.

Thanks
Spirit

PS: If I sentenced aru wrong than I'll apologise but he didn't give me any good explanation to make me change my mind.

3. August 2009, 17:48:42
spirit_66 
Subject: Re:
aaru:
Analysing a game with GNU and if it shows me that the opponent didn't make any fault, that makes me alerted and suspicious.

3. August 2009, 13:06:13
spirit_66 
Subject: Re: Cheating player
playBunny:
But isn't this a shame?? What's the purpose to do this? Is it a big lack of self-confidence? We don't play for money here. It's only to do a fair competition.

3. August 2009, 12:28:26
spirit_66 
Subject: Re:
aaru:
You're not the only suspected player. Don't be proud about your misbehavior.

3. August 2009, 11:22:40
spirit_66 
Subject: Cheating player
What would anybody think if BG games are analysed by GNU and one can see that ones opponent didn't make any mistake and what if this happens again and again???
Did I play against a grandmaster of BG?
What is your experience?
Spirit

19. February 2009, 05:04:20
spirit_66 
To see the players "pmvaht" games is very interesting. Watch his opponent players and how they worked. Why does the player "pmvaht" start with such a high BKR??? I guess there's a lot of cheating around. That's why I decided not to prolonge my membership here.

7. February 2009, 05:31:08
spirit_66 
Subject: Re:
Constellation36:
Really understand your feeling.

14. December 2008, 11:07:43
spirit_66 
Subject: Re: be careful with Draw offers
Pedro Martínez:
YES!!!!

14. December 2008, 06:12:45
spirit_66 
Subject: Re: be careful with Draw offers
paully:

Look where he's (Marian_colonelu) from I know him as a cheater.

8. November 2008, 09:01:44
spirit_66 
Subject: Re: A cheat?
Pedro Martínez:

That's a damn cheating!!!! What other will you expect from the eastern mafia????

19. October 2008, 15:55:57
spirit_66 
Subject: Re: CHEATING FOR RATINGS
paully:
They should kicked out all!!! Damn cheater!!!

19. October 2008, 08:50:02
spirit_66 
Subject: Re: sneaky player beware
paully:
Thanks

21. July 2008, 13:06:14
spirit_66 
Subject: Re: MATFixer
Gordon Shumway:

MATFixer is a very good tool. Thanks for doing this. Now I can analyse also Matches.

Bye
Rudi

15. July 2008, 14:52:52
spirit_66 
Subject: Re: Doubles theory
wetware:
I thought we talk about normal BG without any trick.

15. July 2008, 10:02:57
spirit_66 
Subject: Re: Doubles theory
Thad:

I would say of course because it's an advantage especially at bear off. But the player should be experienced enough to use the good dice well.

Maybe you can find the verification from the internet.

Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top