User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Vikings 
 Politics

Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.


All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..

As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.

Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!


*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199   > >>
3. September 2010, 01:53:56
"GERRY" 
Subject: Re:
Bernice:

3. September 2010, 00:54:44
Bernice 
**poof**

2. September 2010, 21:33:56
"GERRY" 
Subject: Re:
The Col: We are the Conser's here what about the nutty repubs we already no the Libs are nutty Col chickin man

2. September 2010, 21:29:17
Mort 
Subject: Re: Koch Brothers
Ferris Bueller: Or them using some old 'new deal' law that allows them to have a their cattle businesses graze free on federal land without the tax payers seeing a penny.

2. September 2010, 20:31:46
Ferris Bueller 
Subject: Re: Koch Brothers

(V):  In addition, while pummeling Obamacare, they apply for some of its benefits.


http://whohijackedourcountry.blogspot.com/2010/08/koch-industries-spend-billions.html


2. September 2010, 20:23:56
Mort 
Subject: Re: Koch Brothers
Ferris Bueller: I read about them.... going on about not letting people tread on you then getting compulsory sale orders on where they wanted a pipeline.

Nice... not.

2. September 2010, 20:21:36
Mort 
Subject: Re:Until the end of time, Dem's will insult republicans, and republicans will insult dem's. It's just silly for either side to whine about the other side doing it
rod03801: To a certain respect I can disagree. Our UK law though respecting freedom of speech also respects that people can go over the top. In that.. you are right ALL sides do it. Yet here in the UK .. criminal prosecution can follow.

2. September 2010, 19:55:48
"GERRY" 
Subject: Re:
The Col: if i where you i would be here Col chickin & if you ever find the time i sent you messages in private please reply to them Pal this goes back to where i first post to you here Pal & met you bud

2. September 2010, 19:40:57
Ferris Bueller 
Subject: he lost an election for speaking out against Rush and his insanity

Tuesday:   It may have been Representative Bob Inglis (R-SC) who spoke out against Rush & Beck.  He lost big in the GOP primary to the Tea Party candidate.  Yes.  That's the same Tea Party "revolution" funded mainly by Rupert Murdoch and the oil barren Koch Brothers - not the grass roots.


http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/29/opinion/29rich.html


http://blog.reidreport.com/2010/08/the-koch-brothers-the-2010-election-and-the-return-of-the-john-birch-society/


2. September 2010, 18:30:59
rod03801 
Subject: Re:showed for Bush.
(V): Um, maybe YOU personally didn't.
"We "libs" (as you call us) did not go to the lengths to disrespect Bush as you do Obama. We had a go at policy, mistakes as you'd expect."

But plenty of "libs" have gone to even greater lengths. Including a few posters on this board. Don't get me wrong, I have JUST AS LITTLE respect for George Bush as I do for Obama.
My point is that your statement is not accurate at all.

Plus, it's all just foolishness anyway. Both sides do the exact same thing. Regardless of if "2 wrongs, don't make a right".
Until the end of time, Dem's will insult republicans, and republicans will insult dem's. It's just silly for either side to whine about the other side doing it. Both sides are just as good at being nasty.

2. September 2010, 17:42:57
Mort 
Subject: Re:t was said he lost an election for speaking out against Rush and his insanity
Modified by Mort (2. September 2010, 17:43:42)
Tuesday: ...... that is not a good sign. It also blows to high heaven this board's conservative element and them forever them harking on about how they have so little mediaon 'their' side.. guess for them radio and newspapers don't count.. or that of some strange new invention called "the in-ter-net"

2. September 2010, 17:26:11
Mort 
Subject: Re:The right wants Obama to fail even if it means the country suffers just so they can be in power.
Tuesday: What did happen?

2. September 2010, 17:19:57
Mort 
Subject: Re:The right wants Obama to fail even if it means the country suffers just so they can be in power.
Tuesday: Our last government bailed out the banks as did Obama even though Bush knew it was coming..

.. If they had failed, the entire financial system would have collapsed. Anyone wishing that to happen is either nuts, ignorant, stupid or a combination of all three.

2. September 2010, 17:11:09
Mort 
Subject: Re:The right wants Obama to fail even if it means the country suffers just so they can be in power.
Tuesday: Well if that is the case then the right does not deserve to be in power. Any party that gloats on the failure of it's government when such failure causes suffering to it's own fellow citizens is not worthy of being elected. Locked up in an asylum more like!!

2. September 2010, 16:40:00
Mort 
Modified by Mort (2. September 2010, 17:11:36)
What is this thing of Beck's... The Black Robe Regiment??

Why did the Mormons supply 30 out of 42 million dollars in the Prop 8 ballot campaign in California in aid to outlaw gay marriage??

2. September 2010, 16:27:42
Mort 
Subject: Re:showed for Bush.
Artful Dodger: We "libs" (as you call us) did not go to the lengths to disrespect Bush as you do Obama. We had a go at policy, mistakes as you'd expect.

As for free speech.. there comes responsibility.. you cannot moan in the future on how anyone talks about your hero's.. such as Beck and Palin.. or the Tea party.

2. September 2010, 16:20:49
"GERRY" 
Subject: Re: and b4I4get
Artful Dodger: MaYbE oBaMa WoRk'S fOr TyRa

2. September 2010, 12:59:26
"GERRY" 
Subject: Re: And where are the liberals defending this fact?
Artful Dodger: Why are they hiding under the chair?

2. September 2010, 12:54:52
"GERRY" 
Subject: Re:
Artful Dodger:

2. September 2010, 08:40:47
Übergeek 바둑이 
Subject: Re:
Artful Dodger:

> Did you NOT see how much money that idiot is borrowing against our future?
> Did you not see the comparison over the last 200 plus years vrs his 19 months in office?

Is that Bush or Obama? The truth is that every president has always borrowed more than the previous guy, even Bill Clinton, who ended with a surplus, borrowed more than the previous administrations. George W. Bush borrowed more than any president in history. That information you posted a while back assigned to Obama the bailout for the banks, and that was George W. Bush's idea. Obama merely enacted a lot of policies born at the end of the Bush administration in agreement with the Federal Reserve. In that sense it is unfair to blame Obama for a lot of policies generated in a Republican administration.

2. September 2010, 07:43:17
The Col 

2. September 2010, 07:36:30
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: and b4I4get
The Col:

2. September 2010, 07:35:02
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
The Col: The big difference is that Obama is a dunce when it comes to running a country. Did you NOT see how much money that idiot is borrowing against our future? Did you not see the comparison over the last 200 plus years vrs his 19 months in office? How about the fact that the Democrats, under his leadership, passed a health care bill complete with loads of earmarks - some for the most ridiculous of things. It can't be paid for and will likely be repealed. Do you, like many of your liberal friends, not get it that Obama is a failure as a president? He's so unpopular that many would rather have Bush back?

You're so disingenuous. Opportunistic. So eager to point a finger without owning up to your own choices. Look back on your own posts and clean up your own bashings, both subtle and overt. Then you'll have the credibility with me and I'll listen.

But you won't. Have any of you libs actually made a coherent case for Obama's policies?

no

Try that sometime. Something that's not dripping with the usual sarcasm. Til then, you get what you give.

2. September 2010, 07:25:37
The Col 
Subject: Re:
Artful Dodger: Actually pretty accurate, you guys put the Bush bashers to shame, repubs can kick some butt

2. September 2010, 07:23:29
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
The Col: disingenuous

2. September 2010, 07:22:06
The Col 
Subject: Re:
Artful Dodger: But weren't the repubs saying the same about Bush bashing? I expected more from you guys, two wrongs don't make a right do they? are you guys no better than those nutty libs?

2. September 2010, 07:17:31
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
The Col: You must mean like you libs showed for Bush. Free Speech here. We like to use it. You object to my Constitutional right to free speech? tsk, tsk


2. September 2010, 07:14:45
The Col 
So little respect for the president of your country, tsk tsk

2. September 2010, 07:05:58
Papa Zoom 
Subject: I told ya so remember?

2. September 2010, 07:02:17
Papa Zoom 



2. September 2010, 06:23:12
Papa Zoom 
Subject: And where are the liberals defending this fact?
From the moment Washington took the oath of office to the moment Obama took the oath, the US had borrowed 9 trillion dollars. In the last 19 months, we've borrowed 3.5 trillion dollars. You do the math. And Obama plans to borrow more.

They are doing this:

2. September 2010, 06:22:18
Papa Zoom 


Well, some apparently do. Remember, Obama took Ohio. That was then.

An Ohio poll - run by a democratic group
asked "Who would Ohio voters rather have as a President?

George W, Bush 50%
Barack Obama 42%

2. September 2010, 02:20:32
"GERRY" 
Subject: Re: Here's a stat for you to show you all just how mad Obama is as President (I mean that as in crazy)
Artful Dodger:

2. September 2010, 02:19:00
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: Here's a stat for you to show you all just how mad Obama is as President (I mean that as in crazy)
"GERRY": Republican's will control both the House and Senate and they won't let him.

Hey Dems, it's pay back time. Bye Bye Pelosi hello Congressional investigations of Democratic corruption. Lots to choose from too.

2. September 2010, 02:17:50
Bernice 
Subject: Re: Here's a stat for you to show you all just how mad Obama is as President (I mean that as in crazy)
Artful Dodger: I was waiting for words of wisdom LOL....no wuks hahahahaha

2. September 2010, 02:16:52
"GERRY" 
Subject: Re: Here's a stat for you to show you all just how mad Obama is as President (I mean that as in crazy)
Artful Dodger: Will they let him go past 9 trillion dollars ?

2. September 2010, 02:11:08
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Here's a stat for you to show you all just how mad Obama is as President (I mean that as in crazy)
From the moment Washington took the oath of office to the moment Obama took the oath, the US had borrowed 9 trillion dollars. In the last 19 months, we've borrowed 3.5 trillion dollars. You do the math. And Obama plans to borrow more.

2. September 2010, 02:05:35
Papa Zoom 
Subject: An Ohio poll - run by a democratic group
asked "Who would Ohio voters rather have as a President?

George W, Bush 50%
Barack Obama 42%

1. September 2010, 23:20:23
Bernice 
Subject: Re:
Artful Dodger: oh my gawd

1. September 2010, 23:06:13
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
"GERRY": The others reply too but they never really say anything.

1. September 2010, 23:04:25
"GERRY" 
Subject: Re:
Artful Dodger: You will always get reply's from me I love your cartoons

1. September 2010, 22:59:52
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
Bernice: that's what happens when i stop posting for a while

1. September 2010, 22:58:44
Bernice 
whatever happened to the sensible and logical conversation in here.....cant understand most of it...

1. September 2010, 22:26:00
"GERRY" 
Maybe will see see another Britishhhh & Yankeeaaa war here if you like booze & if there weed into look out

<< <   190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top