 |
|
Tsensor: Vikings
  PoliticsForum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics. All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc.. As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself. Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!! *"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned." Režiim: Igaüks võib postitada
14. juuli 2009, 19:26:41 Teema: Re: (V): Some archaic old law based on misconceptions of how a baby is made???  explain the misconception of how a baby is made then? I mean, you can obviously accept that we are an evolving creature from the point of birth into adulthood and beyond, right? But you cannot accept that we are the same evolving creature from the point of our conception?The notion that a woman has a right to do with her own body as she wishes, i will not argue, and so too for a man..... but an unborn child is not a part of a womans own body, the womans body is simply the incubator for the unborn baby.... how can a sperm, injected into a woman by a man, be then called part of the womans body??? If I pick up some diamonds from your table and swallow them, are those diamonds now part of my body, which I have the right to do with them as i please????  |
Kuupäev ja kellaaeg
Sisselogitud sõbrad
Lemmik-vestlusgrupid
Sõpruskonnad
Päeva vihje
|
|
Autoriõigus © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, kõik õigused kaitstud. Tagasi algusse |