Brugernavn: Kodeord:
Ny bruger registrering
Moderator: Vikings 
 Politics

Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.


All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..

As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.

Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!


*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."


Meddelelser per side:
Liste over diskussionsborde
Du har ikke rettigheder til at skrive meddelelser til dette bord, Mindste medlemsskabsniveau nødvendigt for at skrive til dette bord er BrainBonde.
Tilstand: Alle kan skrive
Søg i meddelelser:  

16. August 2010, 22:17:34
The Col 
Emne: Rex Murphy: Testing America’s tolerance

16. August 2010, 22:55:48
Papa Zoom 
Emne: Re: Rex Murphy: Testing America’s tolerance
Jim Dandy: "George W. Bush himself, with the full weight of his office (and, I’d add, at some political risk to himself) was without stint in proclaiming Islam a “religion of peace.” He even went to a Washington mosque to underline solidarity with American Muslims and their peaceful co-religionists all over the world." Yeah GW!

and

"It is an almost boundlessly tolerant city and society — New York and America. But we must make a note on this point: A tolerance is being, and has been, shown, toward Islam, which Islam emphatically does not show to other creeds in regions or countries where Islam is predominant. In some Muslim places, a mere Bible in a suitcase is an indictable offence."

I might add it can (and often does) get you killed.

This is definitely worth reading. The author offers a unique and well-thought perspective on the issue of the "ground zero" mosque.

16. August 2010, 23:04:50
The Col 
Emne: Re: Rex Murphy: Testing America’s tolerance
Artful Dodger: I support his opinion that if the mosque is built, it should contain both tributes to those who were killed, and those who both risked their lives and or died trying to save them.There should also be(as he mentions) condemnation of those who executed the event.It's apparently going to be a big building, finding room shouldn't be an issue.

16. August 2010, 23:08:47
Papa Zoom 
Emne: Re: Rex Murphy: Testing America’s tolerance
Jim Dandy: those were excellent points. one does have to wonder why the Muslim organizers continue to peruse the building of the mosque considering the huge criticism that's been coming their way.

16. August 2010, 23:12:35
The Col 
Emne: Re: Rex Murphy: Testing America’s tolerance
Artful Dodger: Are they on record with a statement regarding the sensitivity of the issue?

16. August 2010, 23:15:25
Papa Zoom 
Emne: Re: Rex Murphy: Testing America’s tolerance
Jim Dandy: Likely but I'm not aware of exactly what's been said.

16. August 2010, 23:18:20
The Col 
Emne: Re: Rex Murphy: Testing America’s tolerance
Artful Dodger: If they aren't dealing with it by showing the utmost sensitivity, the whole thing should be scrapped

16. August 2010, 23:20:50
Papa Zoom 
Emne: Re: Rex Murphy: Testing America’s tolerance
Jim Dandy: Maybe the very fact that they are building it three blocks from Ground Zero, and amidst such opposition, shows they are a bit insensitive to the matter.

17. August 2010, 01:38:45
Ferris Bueller 
Emne: Re: Rex Murphy: Testing America’s tolerance

Artful Dodger:   The Mosque was already at its site before the angry responses from the right about it being expanded.  In addition there are other Mosque which have been close to the Twin Towers before 9/11.  Should we tear all of them?  There are also "adult entertainment" establishments close to ground zero which don't exactly honor the memory of 9/11 victims.


The only arguments against this building seems to center around the prejudice that any Muslim establishment near ground zero is evil because radical muslims were responsible for the attack.  Thus, all muslims should be lumped into the same category.  As you pointed out, W visited mosques to eliminate prejudice against all American Muslims.  If the mosques had a history of supporting terrorist activity, it would be one thing.  But, I haven't heard of any such activity.


17. August 2010, 01:51:40
Papa Zoom 
Emne: Re: The only arguments against this building seems to center around the prejudice that any Muslim establishment near ground zero is evil because radical muslims were responsible for the attack.
Ferris Bueller: This is a completely false statement.

Dato og klokkeslæt
Venner online
Favoritborde
Sammenslutninger
Dagens tip
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Tilbage til toppen