用户名: 密码:
新用户注册
监管者:  Walter Montego 
 Chess

Chess Discussion

For posting:
- invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu or go straight to the Chess Invitation)
- information about upcoming tournaments
- discussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position ... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted)
- links to interesting related sites (non-promotional)


每页的消息:
讨论板列表
您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑兵级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。
状态: 所有人能发表
帖子搜索:  

27. 三月 2019, 15:10:32
Nothingness 
题目: Re: Notation
Nothingness修改(27. 三月 2019, 15:11:37)
Walter Montego: to me its much simpler to use for the same reasons you give for algebraic.. Algebraic too confusing to me.. I cant visualize the board with algebraic. I need to see the "X" for a capture which isn't present in algebraic. when I see something in notation for example E4,, what is moving to E4? I need to see "P"

9. 二月 2019, 03:57:31
Nothingness 
题目: Notation
Nothingness修改(9. 二月 2019, 03:57:56)
am I the only person who still uses descriptive notation. I really still after over 40 years playing chess still find algebraic horrible. P-k4 forever

12. 四月 2010, 17:03:52
Nothingness 
yes it is very complicated using the letters and numbers of the ranks and files. e4 tells me nothing. where as P-Q4 tells me exactly what was moved and where to. e4 is too vague what moved to E4?

11. 四月 2010, 23:19:54
Nothingness 
题目: chesss notation
I was asking a few years ago to get a form of notation that i am familiar with. i dont use any of the version that we use here on BK. the one i use is : P-K4 P-K4 2. B-B4 N-kb3 3 P-kR4 ect... i never could get the other versions... what is up with this.?

日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有
回顶端