Spelersnaam: Wachtwoord:
Registratie voor nieuwe spelers
Toezichthouder: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Berichten per pagina:
Forumlijst
U hebt geen toestemming om berichten op dit forum achter te laten. Het minimaal vereiste lidmaatschap om berichten op dit forum achter te mogen laten is Brain Pion.
Modus: Iedereen kan berichten achterlaten
Zoek in berichten:  

<< <   355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364   > >>
3. februari 2006, 20:26:55
Chicago Bulls 
Onderwerp: Re:
Fencer: LOL! But madPhilip you didn't answer how do they have Brainking Rook "forever"....?

3. februari 2006, 20:26:21
furbster 
Im talked my self through some made up reasons, and im dying to know the real one lol

3. februari 2006, 20:26:05
playBunny 
alanback, Fencer:

3. februari 2006, 20:25:28
Fencer 

3. februari 2006, 20:24:46
alanback 
Onderwerp: Re:
Pythagoras: Maybe they have sold their souls to Fencer!

3. februari 2006, 20:13:04
Chicago Bulls 
Onderwerp: Re:
ScarletRose Mainly, but also to have on your profile a reminder that you are immortal and then realise that this is not true then....

3. februari 2006, 20:09:27
ScarletRose 
Onderwerp: Re:
Pythagoras: Maybe.. Til death do us Part??

3. februari 2006, 20:08:43
furbster 
They've been around for ages alanback! Price on thsoe are negotiated monthly or something

3. februari 2006, 20:07:44
alanback 
I see Brain Golden Rooks too

3. februari 2006, 20:07:06
Chicago Bulls 
So how the forever occured.....? Fencer? Please hurry up since my curiousity is eating my body....
Also "forever" is not the most appropriate word for various reasons.....

3. februari 2006, 19:56:08
ScarletRose 
okay.. I see the forever now.. I must have been lookin at the top activity line.. not realizing it! LOL

Dingy blonde I am

3. februari 2006, 19:54:45
ScarletRose 
Onderwerp: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: Hmmm I see they have zero for brains also!! Just teasin.. but, they didn't show any brains.. Hmmm

3. februari 2006, 19:52:50
coan.net 
Onderwerp: Re:
ScarletRose: I see it saying "forever". The question was brought up here on how they got it.

3. februari 2006, 19:51:19
ScarletRose 
Onderwerp: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: So what does that signify?? I reviewed francescolr profile since he holds one of those black rooks.. and he doesn't have major membership years on his..

3. februari 2006, 19:48:12
coan.net 
Onderwerp: Re:
alanback: You can go to the player list ( http://brainking.com/en/PlayerList?a=ap ), sort by level type - the "black rook's are mixed in with the regular ones.

3. februari 2006, 19:47:58
pauloaguia 
Onderwerp: Re:
alanback: Just sort the player list by membership level. Black rooks show up among the others... there are 4 total

3. februari 2006, 19:47:06
furbster 
I just happened to be browsing tourneys but if you go on online players 2 are online

3. februari 2006, 19:45:56
alanback 
Onderwerp: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: Where can you see these?

3. februari 2006, 19:43:05
coan.net 
Onderwerp: Re:
furbster: I see 4 total, but don't know why.

3. februari 2006, 19:41:00
Stevie 
Onderwerp: Re:
furbster: I guess Filip just hasnt added it to the paid memnbership page yet hehe

3. februari 2006, 19:40:12
furbster 
yeh

3. februari 2006, 19:39:25
Stevie 
Onderwerp: Re:
furbster: The rook is also diferent.. its black or dark grey

3. februari 2006, 19:37:53
furbster 
ok i've seen two of em now.. it can't be just me lol

3. februari 2006, 19:33:25
furbster 
How can you be brainrook forever? I'm sure if my eyes aren't deceiving me that i just saw someone with that dexcription lol Unless he's payed for a load of years in advance?

3. februari 2006, 17:56:36
Stevie 
Onderwerp: Re: Fencer,,, why cant my oponent or I move in these games?
Fencer: Cheers Filip

3. februari 2006, 16:45:35
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: Fencer,,, why cant my oponent or I move in these games?
Stevie: Wait a minute.

3. februari 2006, 16:11:31
Stevie 
Onderwerp: Fencer,,, why cant my oponent or I move in these games?

3. februari 2006, 14:47:22
furbster 
Onderwerp: Random tournements
I think this is a really cool thing to have, thanks Fencer... something different and fun to have a go at

2. februari 2006, 22:39:55
Vikings 
Onderwerp: Re: "Improved" tournament system
playBunny: probably have to be a knight and experiment

2. februari 2006, 14:00:26
playBunny 
Onderwerp: Re: "Improved" tournament system
Fencer: [Runs off to Membership Levels] "Hmm, nothing changed there, but then that'll be the last part of any changes. Where else can I look..?"

I wonder what it was you did..

2. februari 2006, 13:55:27
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: "Improved" tournament system
playBunny: Hmmmm, maybe I did.

2. februari 2006, 13:28:35
bouncer 
Onderwerp: Re: "Improved" tournament system
Fencer: I didn't ask you to change anything .I just express my "bad" feeling about this thing. I thought that's why we have "discussion" bords .

2. februari 2006, 13:26:59
playBunny 
Onderwerp: Re: "Improved" tournament system
Fencer: "everybody is free to use only features he likes."

Mostly true. Knights who only play a few games can't utilise the tournament system as they might like because of the one-per-game-type restiction. Eg, a Knight in a multi-year Backgammon tournament can enjoy no other.

Unless you've changed that somewhere along the line?

2. februari 2006, 13:21:51
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: "Improved" tournament system
ZEROZERO: If you think it stinks, don't use it. That's what BrainKing is about, everybody is free to use only features he likes. I think it's pointless to discuss in this way because nobody likes everything. Whatever your point is, I don't play to change anything.

2. februari 2006, 12:58:18
bouncer 
Onderwerp: Re: "Improved" tournament system
Fencer: that's right ...and nobody "forced" me to pay lol ..I was only paying for those members because I wanted them to enjoy this great site and they didn't have enough money to buy a membership or they didn't have a credit card and so on .... at his moment I'm afraid when I see things like this happen .I think the whole "brain" system stinks .. When a player pays a membership for another person I think you should give the brains automatically ...OK...I didn't read the whole stuff about the brain system , cause, as I said, I'm not interested in all that administration rubbish ....but now , more than one year later I cannot sign up for those tourneys ...I think that sucks a bit :)
We'll see what other improvements are coming up but I don't have a good feeling with this first one :(((

2. februari 2006, 12:40:28
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re: "Improved" tournament system
ZEROZERO: The prize tournaments with an entry fee is just one small part of the improved tournament system. And, of course, nobody is forced to pay for other users.

2. februari 2006, 12:06:39
bouncer 
Onderwerp: "Improved" tournament system
I have my doubts about this tournament system .
I bought lots of memberships for different players with my credit card but since I'm not interested in administration things, I didn't know about the brain system. This means I didn't mention whatever I needed to mention to obtain those brains . Right : at this moment I got 0 brains so I cannot sign up for this "improved" tournament system .
Besides this , I'm afraid this kind of tournaments will create a small group of elite players ..those who got "brains" :))Playing for more brains ....
Oh well ....not my problem ...I will go on playing "normal" games, but I think I'll stop paying new memberships for belgian players who got no credit-card or players who are afraid for internet payments. No more renewals of memberships with my credit card .

2. februari 2006, 09:18:42
Peón Libre 
Onderwerp: editing posts
Having just posted a redundant reply on another board, I'm curious about the possibility of editing or removing one's own posts. I sometimes see posts flagged as modified, but I haven't found any way to do this. Is this another feature which is only available to paying members?

2. februari 2006, 07:26:20
Fencer 
Onderwerp: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: No, this kind of bonus always applies to the user for whom the membership was bought. It is done on a system level.

2. februari 2006, 02:40:32
ScarletRose 
Onderwerp: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: not to butt in here Chuckers.. but, I have recently purchased 3 membieships and have gotten the credit and the brains for each one.. just add a note to the purchase to credit your account with the brains and bonus..

2. februari 2006, 01:52:14
Pedro Martínez 
Onderwerp: Re:
Pythagoras: BBC :)

2. februari 2006, 01:41:02
Czuch 
Fencer....

If I buy a membership for someone else, can I have the bonus membership in my name instead of theirs, should it be given? Or even saved for use in a prize tournament?

2. februari 2006, 00:18:38
alanback 
Onderwerp: Re: Buying a 6-months Rook membership
playBunny: Anatomically, it might be more correct to think of extending Rookhood into Pawnness anyway . . .

2. februari 2006, 00:13:08
playBunny 
Onderwerp: Re: Buying a 6-months Rook membership
alanback: Lol. I don't believe you can extend your own Pawness into someone else's Rookhood! But as to who the extension is being applied to ... whomever you nominate.

2. februari 2006, 00:07:24
alanback 
Onderwerp: Re: Buying a 6-months Rook membership
playBunny: How do you know if you're extending your Pawnness into your own Rookhood or someone else's?

2. februari 2006, 00:04:02
playBunny 
Onderwerp: Re: Buying a 6-months Rook membership
Pythagoras: I believe the answer to 1) is that you don't actually buy memberships, per se, you buy membership extensions. It's just that with some people they are extending their Pawnness into Rookhood. So it would be B).

I asked a similar question to 2) and 3) way back whenever and got the answer "Fencer would work something out", so I'll be interested to hear any further elucidation.

2. februari 2006, 00:02:57
Chicago Bulls 
Onderwerp: Re: Bonus
Aangepast door Chicago Bulls (2. februari 2006, 00:03:12)
alanback: I was thinking the same......
This system is like:

  • You completed a purchase of 6 months membership and won another 3 months!

    Or......:

  • You completed a purchase of 6 months membership
    and DIDN'T WIN any bonus you sucker.....

  • 1. februari 2006, 23:54:00
    alanback 
    Onderwerp: Bonus
    I'm risk averse. Instead of a 50% chance at a 50% bonus, can I have a 25% bonus guaranteed?

    1. februari 2006, 23:46:03
    Chicago Bulls 
    I have 3 questions. If you are too lazy to answer all 3 then the first is of the most importance for me!


    1)What would happen if someone with Rook membership, buy a 6-months Rook membership at 14 February while it still has 5 more months of Rook membership:

    A)He would have, starting from 14 February, 6-months of Rook membership....

    B)He would have, starting from 14 February, 11-months of Rook membership.....

    A) or B) is valid?

    ---------------------------------------
    --------
    2)What would happen if someone with Rook membership, buy a 6-months Knight membership at 14 February while it still has 5 more months of Rook membership:

    A)He would have, starting from 14 February, 6-months of Knight membership....

    B)He would have, starting from 14 February, 5-months of rook membership and then 6 motnhs of Knight membership....

    C)Something else.....

    Is A) or B) or C) valid?

    ---------------------------------------
    ------
    3)What would happen if someone with Rook membership, buy a 6-months Maharajah membership at 14 February while it still has 5 more months of Rook membership:

    A)He would have, starting from 14 February, 6-months of Maharajah membership....

    B)He would have, starting from 14 February, 5-months of Rook membership and then 6 months of Maharajah membeship....

    C)Something else.....

    A) or B) or C) is valid?
    ----------------------------------------------

    1. februari 2006, 22:55:30
    Fencer 
    Onderwerp: Re:
    Fwiffo: Right.

    << <   355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364   > >>
    Datum en tijd
    Aanwezige vrienden
    Favoriete Forums
    Genootschappen
    Tip van de dag
    Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, alle rechten voorbehouden.
    Terug naar boven