(indietro)
Nome utente : Password :
Registrazione di un nuovo utente
Moderatore: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messaggi per pagina:
Lista delle discussioni
Non ti è possibile inserire messaggi in questo forum. Il livello minimo di sottoscrizione per linvio dei messaggi è {0}.
Modalità: Chiunque può inviare messaggi
Cerca nei messaggi:  

<< <   146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155   > >>
7. Aprile 2009, 00:24:53
Mort 
Argomento: Re: Ucore max possible points on all of Dice Poker, Triple Dice Poker, Dice Poker 6D and Triple Dice Poker 6D. ------ That would be hard, if not almost impossible.
coan.net: Aye.... For a perfect game, it would be a one in a well... big odds.

Near perfect points though.. rare, but not impossible.

6. Aprile 2009, 22:03:42
alanback 
Argomento: Re: Unlikely archievements.
joshi tm:I think "negative achievements" is a better term.

6. Aprile 2009, 21:39:03
Undertaker. 
Argomento: Re: Unlikely archievements.
joshi tm: Yes, why not? If everybody want do achievements, nobody will want do black achievements, but sometimes we can do it against our intention, so why not create both?

6. Aprile 2009, 21:29:44
joshi tm 
Argomento: Re: Unlikely archievements.
Undertaker.: A black achievement? Which costs points? Interesting though. Good point.

6. Aprile 2009, 21:27:28
Undertaker. 
Argomento: Re: Unlikely archievements.
joshi tm: Sorry, but ridiculous was your understanding. The goal would be don't achieve an achievement, of course. Besides, my idea is very usual in others situations. In USA, you have Oscares for the best movie, for the best actor, for the best actress, etc., and in the day before, there's an event where is choosed the worst movie, actor, actress, producer, etc. Of course, nobody want be the worst actor and actress, right?

And about my idea, i can understand that block users by 5 or 10 players, block users in 5 discussion boards are bad ideas or dubious ideas, but 10 consecutive lose games (with or without time-out), 5 or 10
consecutive lose games (with or without time-out) in same type of game, etc. would be interesting...


6. Aprile 2009, 21:05:38
alanback 
Argomento: Re: Unlikely archievements.
Fencer:For them, there is no rest of the day!

6. Aprile 2009, 20:53:33
joshi tm 
Argomento: Re: Unlikely archievements.
Undertaker.: Short: No.

Longer: I refer to a P{laystion 3 Throphy where a player must do a friendly fire to achive an achievement, that's ridiculous!

6. Aprile 2009, 20:44:39
Fencer 
Argomento: Achievements
A new discussion board: http://brainking.com/cz/Board?bc=163

6. Aprile 2009, 20:25:05
Mort 
Argomento: Re: Unlikely archievements.
Fencer: Very fast connection!!!!!!!

6. Aprile 2009, 20:08:51
Fencer 
Argomento: Re: Unlikely archievements.
alanback: And what about people who made 10 thousand moves in 1 day?

6. Aprile 2009, 20:08:03
alanback 
Argomento: Re: Unlikely archievements.
Undertaker.:If I make 1,000 moves in 1 day, that means the rest of my day went very badly ;-)

6. Aprile 2009, 19:19:36
Undertaker. 
Argomento: Re: Unlikely archievements.
Modificato da Undertaker. (6. Aprile 2009, 19:20:59)
Undertaker.: Of course, it's a brilliant idea.

6. Aprile 2009, 19:16:43
Undertaker. 
Argomento: Re: Unlikely archievements.
joshi tm: I understand your point, but that can be a dubious question. I don't want make "1000 moves in 1 day". However, you would want say that an archievement is a good thing (something like a guiness book lol) and my proposal is the contrary. :)

But if we're created achievements, so why not create bad achievements or something like that? Block users by 5 or 10 players; block users in 5 discussion boards; block users 5 times in the same discussion board; 10 consecutive lose games (with or without time-out); 5 or 10 consecutive lose games (with or without time-out) in same type of game.

So, is it a good idea?


6. Aprile 2009, 18:37:30
joshi tm 
Argomento: Re: Unlikely archievements.
Undertaker.: I think an Achievement should be something that you really WANT to do.

6. Aprile 2009, 18:18:39
alanback 
Argomento: Re: Unlikely archievements.
coan.net:Methinks you overlooked the irony in the entire post ;-)

6. Aprile 2009, 18:10:17
Undertaker. 
Argomento: Re: Unlikely archievements.
Fencer: And about blocked users? It would be interesting explorer that. Blocked users by 5 or 10 players, for example. lol. I think nobody knows the number of players that block us, so would be a surprise...Well, I don't know if this is a great archievement, but i would like to see it. :)

6. Aprile 2009, 17:23:54
coan.net 
Argomento: Re: Unlikely archievements.
AbigailII:

Score max possible points on all of Dice Poker, Triple Dice Poker, Dice Poker 6D and Triple Dice Poker 6D. ------ That would be hard, if not almost impossible. I would be surprised if anyone has gotten the "max" points. Maybe Fencer can look through the database to find out what the highest score in all those games are, then make an achievement between 50-100 points below that max as the achievement. (of course each game would be a little different.)

6. Aprile 2009, 16:57:40
Fencer 
Argomento: Re: Unlikely archievements.
AbigailII: Some of these suggestions are really good.

6. Aprile 2009, 16:56:06
Pedro Martínez 
Argomento: Re: Unlikely archievements.
AbigailII:

6. Aprile 2009, 16:51:21
AbigailII 
Argomento: Unlikely archievements.
Modificato da AbigailII (7. Aprile 2009, 07:40:50)

  1. Pass 25 turns in a row in backgammon instead of using autopass.
  2. Play at least 10 games of Cheversi, each lasting at least 10 moves.
  3. Have a simple feature request for at least years, but "more important things" need to be done first.
  4. Finish a game against a slow player in less than a year.
  5. Win at least 100 games against different opponents, each game lasting at least 500 moves.
  6. Take more than 3 months to answer interview questions.
  7. Win at least 50 games of Maharajah Chess against different opponents, as white.
  8. Score max possible points on all of Dice Poker, Triple Dice Poker, Dice Poker 6D and Triple Dice Poker 6D.
  9. Have at least 10 games running against different opponents, each lasting for at least a year, without taking any vacation time.
  10. Guess opponents Logic code on the first turn against at least 25 different opponents.
  11. Win at least 25 Dice 10x10 games against different opponents where the only pieces captured are the three Kings.
  12. Lose at least 25 Ludo games against different opponents, without rolling a single 6.
  13. Report 10 bugs whose status after 3 months is still "New".
  14. Appear on the "blocked users" list of at least 100 people.
  15. Make up a language. Pass it off as real. Translate BK to it.
  16. Kill the flying dragon.
  17. Win 25 games of Dark Battleboats against different opponents on your sixth turn.
  18. Accuse an innocent person of cheating and get him/her banned.
  19. Invent a game that sounds good, but turns out to be boring to play, and get Fencer to implement it.
  20. Get yourself banned from 25 boards or more.
  21. Refuse to resign a lost game. Ever.
  22. Have an active retirement in all the stairs, each lasting for at least a year.
    </ol>


[hrqls removed the name of a player]

6. Aprile 2009, 15:01:50
Mort 
That he did Rod.

6. Aprile 2009, 15:00:27
rod03801 
Argomento: Re: GUESS WHO?
Modificato da rod03801 (6. Aprile 2009, 15:01:08)
Gammonator: Fencer DID say this, a little further down the board

BrainKing.com (Fencer, 2009-04-03 14:08:06)

Edit: Ooops, he beat me to it

6. Aprile 2009, 14:58:00
Fencer 
Argomento: Re: GUESS WHO?
Gammonator: It's not my fault that you don't read carefully: BrainKing.com (Fencer, 2009-04-03 14:08:06)

6. Aprile 2009, 14:41:30
Gammonator 
Argomento: Re: GUESS WHO?
Hrqls: I have read and read and read.....Still . no reply from the one who can do anything about it. The man who controls the money and the site. The man who can fix this stupid loop that has 1200 people stuck in a moving situation for the last year or so. I for one,,if it doesnt get resolved will not be back. Even Pat at IYT is not this careless with his site. And he is one dumb,,,never mind. I for one do not want to play with a player who offends the system and abuses it while the management and wonership of this site lets it happen. You have polling on this site, lets use it. Lets be democratic about it. All in favor of getting 35 more vacation days a year by buying another years membership and also the following year get another 35 for free say YES,, All others who believe that one should only get 35 days a year max no matter how many memberships he buys in a yearsay NAY. Its that simple. And if it gets voted down and the Nays win,,then vacation days should be revoked. Do even FOREVER Brain Rooks get unlimited vacations in a year???? I think not.

6. Aprile 2009, 14:25:15
furbster 
Argomento: Am i supposed to have this one?
Lifetime dedication

Purchase a Black Brain Rook membership level.

6. Aprile 2009, 14:17:12
Fencer 
Argomento: Re:
joshi tm: Game achievements are not calculated from archive databases. I will activate it manually soon.

6. Aprile 2009, 14:01:06
joshi tm 
Dobbelschaken (AbigailII - joshi tm)

Should be an achievement I think ;) But it is not achieved at my Profile?

5. Aprile 2009, 18:45:15
rod03801 
Argomento: Re: Guess who?
Pedro Martínez: I misunderstood. I thought Bwild was responding to "Gerry".

Sorry!

5. Aprile 2009, 18:43:39
Pedro Martínez 
Argomento: Re: Guess who?
rod03801: You can find the new vacation system under the Achievements tab?

5. Aprile 2009, 18:41:00
rod03801 
Argomento: Re: Guess who?
Bwild: Look for the "Achievements" Tab on your profile.

5. Aprile 2009, 17:59:04
Bwild 
Argomento: Re: Guess who?
Fencer: what new system?

5. Aprile 2009, 17:58:52
"GERRY" 
Fencer thank's for the nice CUP i received today for BKR. Is this a new idea?:)))

5. Aprile 2009, 15:36:43
"GERRY" 



Thank's FENCER & LIQUID for such a GREAT SITE:))))





5. Aprile 2009, 05:46:16
Papa Zoom 
Argomento: Re: Guess who?
coan.net:hmmmmm, auto pass.  Yeah, now that you mention it!  

5. Aprile 2009, 05:12:52
coan.net 
Argomento: Re: Guess who?
Artful Dodger: Good thing you aren't thinking about the so-called auto-pass feature that is currently on this site and not what a good auto-pass system would be such a great addition to the site.... because if you were thinking about that, then you might have something to complain about.

5. Aprile 2009, 04:48:52
Nirvana 
Argomento: Re: Guess who?
Fencer: I can't speak for others ~ but YES this site is important to me

5. Aprile 2009, 04:34:22
Papa Zoom 
Argomento: Re: Guess who?
Dolittle:yeah, but I think he just gave us permission to complain about stuff.  I can't think of anything right now tho.  lol

5. Aprile 2009, 04:20:06
Dolittle 
Argomento: Re: Guess who?
Fencer: Wow, what a great attitude! I too want to thank you and Liquid for a truly great site! Makes me very glad to be a lifetime member here!

4. Aprile 2009, 20:37:31
Papa Zoom 
Argomento: Re: Guess who?
Fencer:Well in that case....... ;)

4. Aprile 2009, 20:32:47
Fencer 
Argomento: Re: Guess who?
baddessi: Hehe. Thanks. You know, it's a positive thing that people complain about the site. It means that the site is important to them, otherwise they would not bother to post complaints and leave instead. Only dead sites get no complaints.

4. Aprile 2009, 20:14:21
Papa Zoom 
Argomento: Re: Guess who?
baddessi:Very well said!  There are many more positive things here than the few negative.   We don't say thanks often enough.  ;)

4. Aprile 2009, 19:54:07
baddessi 
Argomento: Re: Guess who?
Fencer: I read complaints about the site regularly, and yes, this issue can use some attention. Frustruating for paying members, but a small thing in a big picture.
What I don't often read is a thanks to you and Liquid for all your hard work and all you do for the site.
You must get so many complaints and PMs on a daily basis, and yet you still reply to us. Don't know of any other site owners who do this.
So thank you Fencer! I have been here since 2004 and will probably always stay a member. Still my favorite game site-blows most other right out of the water!
Just wanted you to read a nice post today!
Thanks!

4. Aprile 2009, 01:29:24
Papa Zoom 
Argomento: Re:
Constellation36:  Someone must have given you a present 

4. Aprile 2009, 00:19:08
Constellation36 
I have paid twice for becoming a Brain Bishop. I think that around these days my account expires.
But now without buying any kind of membership at all, i see that i'm a Brain Knight for 6 months!!

WHY? :-)

3. Aprile 2009, 21:51:55
Papa Zoom 
Argomento: Re: Guess who?
MrWCF:

3. Aprile 2009, 20:50:16
MrWCF 
Argomento: Re: Guess who?
Artful Dodger:Now I do--thanks for your help!

3. Aprile 2009, 20:27:02
Papa Zoom 
Argomento: Re: Guess who?
MrWCF: Those are BK smilies.  Do you have them turned on?

3. Aprile 2009, 20:24:45
MrWCF 
Argomento: Re: Guess who?
Artful Dodger:I give up, Artful--what do 1239, 1230, 1198, etc. mean?

3. Aprile 2009, 20:20:28
Papa Zoom 
Argomento: Re: Guess who?
(V):  He likes to keep us in suspense.  I don't know if I should do this this or .  Since the latter comes most naturally, I'll stick with that one. 

3. Aprile 2009, 20:10:58
Mort 
Argomento: Re: Guess who?
Fencer: I'm cool Dude. Just I like this site and would like it to grow, and I know more paying members would make that more possible.

.... And pay for some good wine!!

<< <   146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155   > >>
Data e ora
Amici in linea
Forum preferiti
Gruppi
Consiglio del giorno
Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Torna all'inizio