Wow - 1 hour time limits - so basicly for a 16 player pond, you beter make sure you are on-line during the 15 hours following the start. (Well for rain, I guess it would be at least 7 hours.) (then again, I guess a little less if multiple players fall in.)

Would it make since to add a rule that says when the last 2 players are left, only the lowest bid will fall - leaving the higher bid to win?

It's easily done, especially in the dark ponds I find.

ClayNashvilleTn: eheh

ClayNashvilleTn: Looks like you didn't notice that one player had only 507 points left.

Well, Pbarb only had 507 points available. That´s why some players bet 508.

Never mind. Dang I was sure asleep on that one!

http://brainking.com/game/Pond?g=378

Would someone look at this game and help me understand what happened?

Eriisa: Of course it didn't, it needs 16 players.

Ultra fast sprint! didn't start.

Mike UK: Absolutely.

Fencer: my bet still stands on about 50% draws in this setup.

As I see it, most games will come down to either 2 or 3 players left. If 3, there's a fair chance of a winner. If 2 there cannot be a winner. Is this right?

rabbitoid: More than 2 players can fall in a round.

rabbitoid: no, there will be many draws for 1st and last bets (as it is in regular ponds).

how is a rain pond with an even number of participants to finish?
when only 2 stay in the pond, both automatically lose
with an even number left, normally 2 will go away each round, leaving 2 for the final round.
I forsee a lot of draws here

Fencer: oh, my fault... Thanks Filip :)

they are with the rules for the regular run but highlighted in red

Andre Faria: Why don't you click on show rules?

Anyone knows where are the rules for the "pond in the rain"?

Thanks Fencer. Very useful.

congrats Barb and Monica also :)

And to Barb..:)

Congrats to Monica on her 10th win...:)

yes i have had a tie in the game no one wins it ;)

are ties for a pond possible?

Pedro Martínez: true - but not whilst the BKR works like it does......

Czuch Chuckers: I'm currently working on the details (and since I know there are going to be many questions - trying to get it right.)

But quick overview - will announce what boards need moderators - need to send me (or another global moderator) and note letting us know what board. Don't have to be an "expert" at the subject, but at least need to have knowledge of it. After a week or so, I will list all people who applied to Fencer & the other Global Moderators which at that time we will try to find someone who is the best for the job.

Again, that was just a quick overview - I'll include more details hopefully in the next few days maybe. :-)

BIG BAD WOLF: What was your application process like? Or any of the other globs for that matter?

I believe soon we will be taking "applications" for new moderators - to hopefully get some users who has not had a chance to help the site much - a chance to help moderate - which of course you, or anyone can apply for. (I will post details when we are ready.)

BBW, will you be keeping this board? What happened to Stevie? I would like to moderate this board.

Bry: Nah, second places are for quitters...:)

that is a good idea... we should set up some teams.

Nothingness: Who would team up?

Anyway that leads to a good variation. Teams! 4 players per team, winning team is the team with the winning player. Collaboration would be encouraged.

welll eventually i can see collaborating on ponds and having alliances to ensure winners and loseres. in that situation, if you be in the high 4880s and others bet 100 or 150 your finished. big leads are imposssible to protect if you team up.

BIG BAD WOLF: LOL.... you dont have enough to do, so you took over another moderating job?

Pedro Martínez: 9888 - and guarantee 2nd place....

BIG BAD WOLF: It's just a theoretical situation, no real pond...I only wanted to post it here in order to show what I consider as real hard situations to resolve...

Czuch Chuckers: Well, if you mean this pond, I have no idea, and if you mean this one, he's doing quite good.

Pedro Martínez: I think it would also depend on the players (if it's not a dark pond). If they don't know what they are doing, they may only bid a little higher (500-1000 points) more then the last bid. If the remaining players have been around for awhile, then it may be higher.

Czuch Chucker: He is no longer a moderator.

What happened to Stevie?????

Player 1 : 10000
Player 2 : 9999
Player 3 : 9887

The last bets were in the 4000s...

Well I would probably bet something like 4889 but it seems I might end up at the bottom of the pond... LOL

id probably go with 5050 or 5300. id be more than 50% of my remaining pts.

Pedro Martínez: me too, but everytime i dont bet like that at such a stage i fall in !!!

Bry: Too high I think...

Pedro Martínez: 5-6000 i say.

Player 1 : 10000
Player 2 : 9956
Player 3 : 9668
Player 4 : 9599
Player 5 : 9597

In the previous round, Irishrose fell in the pond with a 2500-point bet (bet everything she had left), and the round before, the bets were varying between 3000 and 4000...

1. Vikings 6009
2. Pedro martinez 5990
3. Nothingness 5960
4. Thad 5800
5. Czuch Chuckers 5779

Provided the last bet was in high 4000s, it would be a mistake if Vikings bet anything else but 5991 (in my opinion, of course). All of the players will bet more than 5779, that's clear. Now the second place is only 181 points above the last place so after this round, nobody should have more than 500 points, which is a proven win for the 1st place runner. If you bet lower than what Chuck has left, it's most likely you're going to fall in the pond.

If I was Chuck, I'd bet everything.
If I was Thad, I'd bet everything also.
If I was Nothingness, I'd bet 5780 hoping that Pedro would bet at least 30 points more than me.
If I was Pedro (), I'd risk it and bet 5471, trying to pass Vikings to the 1st place.
And Viking's bet is clear, 5991.

Nothingness: I think games like this are wide open. I can't see anybody going for a guaranteed bonus. Although they would ensure surviving, they would probably be in last place. One way of looking at the situation is to note that there are 4 rounds left and everyone would like to be leader after 3 of them. That gives some rough parameters, but the fact remains it's anybody's game.