I see. I am playing several games in matches to several points. I think it is almost impossible to account for every case. In one game the player lost against me in the first game, then timed out with zero moves in the second. After his first loss he lost interest in playing. I find this happened mostly with Pawn accounts. They accept a game from the New Games list, then abandon the game. I am rated number 5 in Capablanca Random Chess. I have 20 wins and 7 losses. 10 of my 20 wins are by timeout, and 2 more will be added in the next few days. Without those timeout wins I would be ranked at least 5 places lower. I find that it is making my ranking look much better than it actually is. I don't mind looking smart, but what about honesty!

Very often people accept a game invitation and then they never move again after the first move. Then they lose the game because they run out of time. I don't like winning games like that and they just inflate my rating unnecessarily.
I wish there was some way to remove those games from my rating calculation. I know it is complicated to program something like that, but I think it would be nice.

It would be nice if in the tournament search part we could find tournaments according to the match type.

I like playing matches of several games and to several wins, simply because some games seem slightly slanted towards the white or black player. Multi-game matches even out the odds of winning.

If we can search tournaments according to match type, I would be able to find those tournaments with matches rather than just a single game.