Nome utente : Password :
Registrazione di un nuovo utente
Moderatore: sarok 
 Reversi

Reversi (Othello) and variants.


Messaggi per pagina:
Lista delle discussioni
Non ti è possibile inserire messaggi in questo forum. Il livello minimo di sottoscrizione per linvio dei messaggi è {0}.
Modalità: Chiunque può inviare messaggi
Cerca nei messaggi:  

3. Agosto 2004, 05:51:37
Kevin 
Yes, I don't believe rounded ratings are stored - so the one that's listed as higher would likely be the higher one, even though they round to the same whole number.

27. Luglio 2003, 06:17:10
Kevin 
Ah, i see. Although, does the software tell you about these areas? Otherwise, it still wouldn't be helping you.

26. Luglio 2003, 20:45:17
Kevin 
Well do you consider it cheating to play games against a computer opponent (such as zebra) just for fun, and to improve your game? Because that is essentially what you are doing by analyzing previous positions. I don't think there's anything wrong with it.

26. Luglio 2003, 06:33:17
Kevin 
I think if the position has already passed in the game, i think figuring out what move would have been better is fine, because they can't change their previous moves (if that's what you mean).

25. Marzo 2003, 21:22:33
Kevin 
What is the game number?

28. Febbraio 2003, 07:03:31
Kevin 
Argomento: Re: Waiting to move.
That is how Fencer made it - even if you have no moves you have to go into it and submit it. There was two reasons he told me. First, if several passes are required in a row by one player, the board could come back to the completely different when it is their turn. Second, you still should be able to send a message with the move, even if it is a pass.

Data e ora
Amici in linea
Forum preferiti
Gruppi
Consiglio del giorno
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Torna all'inizio