 |
|
  BrainKing.comBoard for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future. If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider). World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com Non ti è possibile inserire messaggi in questo forum. Il livello minimo di sottoscrizione per linvio dei messaggi è {0}. Modalità: Chiunque può inviare messaggi
<< < 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 > >> 3. Novembre 2004, 20:55:44 tHiNk yOu gUYz WoULd fEEL RiGht @hOMe oN GT. 3. Novembre 2004, 20:55:22  Thank you.
Bry, people would go out of their way to get banned, just so they could post on a board for banned users! It seems to defeat the object? 3. Novembre 2004, 20:54:26  excuse me harley i have only responded to him once , that is all he will get from me . i havent carried anything on 3. Novembre 2004, 20:53:54 like a board for banned users? 3. Novembre 2004, 20:52:52 I do agree with what your saying , but i think there should be a few boards left that people can post on simmilar to gen chat idea 3. Novembre 2004, 20:52:07 3. Novembre 2004, 20:51:20 3. Novembre 2004, 20:51:06 Modificato da Bry (3. Novembre 2004, 20:51:19) Jason - but then you'll have the people left who take the boards seriously and dont use them for abuse etc.... - saving all the hassle that comes with it on every board.... 3. Novembre 2004, 20:49:37 tHaNk yOu JaSoN. 3. Novembre 2004, 20:49:32 yes banned forever would be good , wouldnt be many left posting then though lol 3. Novembre 2004, 20:48:34 Stevie - I have 4 games waiting with klokan too that keep extending.,... 3. Novembre 2004, 20:48:30 3. Novembre 2004, 20:47:28 Jason - how about just banned forever? with Fencer's approval of course.
Slam - if you cant have an adult discussion - with someone who makes a suggestion and has never got involved with you and your posts before, please dont.... 3. Novembre 2004, 20:47:28 yOu sHoULd Be bAnNed jUs 4 sUgGeSTiNg bAnNiNg. 3. Novembre 2004, 20:47:12 Argomento: Fencer Can you have a look and see how many days vacation Klokan has left please? and let us know. this auto vacation business is beyond a joke, especially as its now a weeks worth of holding up tournies etc 3. Novembre 2004, 20:46:25 hOw cAn wE tAKe aNyThIng CoMiNg fROm a cArToOn cHaRaCtEr SeRiOuSLy? 3. Novembre 2004, 20:40:45 well i think the rules that exist already should be adhered to , anyone harresing (sp) any moderator or any other person should start on a ban of all the boards (maybe for a day the first time ) then the second time 3 days then a week after that bann for a month , it would clear the boards for a while . 3. Novembre 2004, 20:39:41 Be nice Slam :o) He only made a suggestion. 3. Novembre 2004, 20:38:22 3. Novembre 2004, 20:33:57 sssst dont give them any ideas ... its just like those soccer 'fans' who just go to a match for a good fight ... they dont mind if the match is canceled because them .. they didnt care for the match
i vote for the growing up part .. i am too new to vote for boards to be removed ;) (cant discussion with personal insults be done via the message box?) 3. Novembre 2004, 20:30:12 If there is all this crap going on about moderators and bans and personal insults, why do we not just ask Fencer to remove all boards, so everyone can get on with just playing games - which is what this site was created for?.. and no replies saying "it's a small minority spoiling it for the rest...." - because it's the majority of people who post on boards all over the site that are involved in all this.
Either everyone should grow up or the boards removed. Any Thoughts? 3. Novembre 2004, 20:22:50 Everyone can't be on 24hrs a day that is what moderators are for! 3. Novembre 2004, 20:07:26 a sAd dAy 4 aMeRiCa. 3. Novembre 2004, 12:56:42 I'm not human so. . . . . . you? 3. Novembre 2004, 12:54:26 Human beings consist of 10^14 selfish cells that only care for their own replication.
So how would you expect a human not to be selfish and be able to accept others different opinions, from their own? Also don't forget that our DNA carries many common elements from our "wild-acting" animals. Our behaviour in general of course is not like hyenas, but sometimes............ 3. Novembre 2004, 12:13:23 How about if everyone acted like adults and then there wouldn't be a need for moderators. 3. Novembre 2004, 08:02:09 Argomento: Moderator's toolbox need  How's 'bout being able to have certain people's posts require approval and everyone else's be posted? I now I could've used such a feature a few days back. Though such a thing would probably be ripe for abuse in the wrong hands too. It'd still be better than banning someone and deleting their posts. 3. Novembre 2004, 04:28:37 good point chuck...how many moderators would allow someone to call them"FB"? 3. Novembre 2004, 04:08:17 Who would do it that is not partial? 3. Novembre 2004, 04:01:26 Argomento: Re:  Well said Long John 3. Novembre 2004, 03:58:58 he has a point though, it is ridiculous theat Stevie and his puppet Rose are moderating a BK board. All public boards should be moderated by impartial moderators and we all know that they are NOT impartial
"This is a BK issue and therefore belongs on this boards" 3. Novembre 2004, 02:56:22 Kinda hard to have a discussion that way LOL
Why not just ban the offenders instead of making everybody pay for their indiscretions. When I have posted something unfit for print, I get banned, the whole board does not suffer. 3. Novembre 2004, 02:47:24 They are held until a moderator comes on and either approves them or deletes them. 3. Novembre 2004, 02:35:12 If you want, I will moderate that one :)
I want to know how you can have a public board where all posts must be approved, yet there is no one online to approve them? 3. Novembre 2004, 02:12:45 Ok, enough! This is the BK board, not the General Arguments and Aggrivation Board. 3. Novembre 2004, 02:08:32 Hmmmmm???..nasty post there UE?... 3. Novembre 2004, 00:05:53 Just ask Hannelore. 2. Novembre 2004, 17:13:50 Argomento: Re: Sure but it hasn't gotten Slam restored yet. 2. Novembre 2004, 17:12:52 being a moderator is tough sometimes,huh? 2. Novembre 2004, 17:12:22 ahhhh hadn't thought of that one...thanks Purple 2. Novembre 2004, 17:11:55 Oh.Thought I was being banned Like Slam LOL If I get banned Purple can you make me a Fellowship? LOL 2. Novembre 2004, 17:10:06 Argomento: Re: These are attempted posts by hidden users. They are hidden for extreme pornography an are still trying to post. 2. Novembre 2004, 17:09:54 how many people do you have on hide?? 2. Novembre 2004, 17:07:40 I'm not able to see anything in Jokes and I get red numbers? 2. Novembre 2004, 06:13:10 Argomento: Re: QUESTION Thanks again 2. Novembre 2004, 06:13:06 hope Fencer looks at bwild's post then ... in the boiler room....
it's been copied if he decides to zap it 2. Novembre 2004, 06:10:38 Argomento: Re: QUESTION  Yes.. it is not allowed to give out someone elses true name to their ID.. They can do it themselves.. if they wish.. 2. Novembre 2004, 06:03:42 Argomento: QUESTION Is there a rule here about exposing someones "real name" here publicly??
I mean,,Some people here use different names here because they do not want their real name to be known by everybody on here... << < 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 > >> |
Data e ora
Amici in linea
Forum preferiti
Gruppi
Consiglio del giorno
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Torna all'inizio |