 |
|
 PoliticsForum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics. All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc.. As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself. Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!! *"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned." You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 > >> 2. February 2009, 07:36:49 Subject: Re:  Foxy Lady: I subscribe to lots of blogs. lol 2. February 2009, 07:28:55 Subject: Re:  Artful Dodger: Where do you all these articles? 2. February 2009, 07:25:54 Subject: Re:  Artful Dodger: oh my gawd.....my sides are sore from laughing  2. February 2009, 07:15:14 Modified by Papa Zoom (2. February 2009, 07:17:56) Guess what Brazil did that the US has been refusing to do? Look for oil! And they found a ton of it. Well, a lot more than a ton. Meanwhile, the US is looking for solar powered vehicles (these will be sold in Alaska) and battery powered vehicles too (long extension chords are in massive production as we speak)  2. February 2009, 07:03:27 Subject: Re: Bernice: Just a little ;) 2. February 2009, 07:03:10 Subject: Re:Obama has a long hard road ahead of him. Foxy Lady: all of it uphill I'd rather work with little kids. 2. February 2009, 06:57:30 Subject: Re: Artful Dodger: do I detect a little bit of sarcasm here   2. February 2009, 06:57:12 Subject: Re: Artful Dodger: Obama has a long hard road ahead of him. 2. February 2009, 06:50:57 Subject: Re: Foxy Lady: Yeah cept if you told me to jump, I'd probably ask how high. Did you know that Obama is against unreasonable gun control? He's being accused of being a "centrist." That's a good thing for those of us on the right. Pelosi wants him to move left but she really wants him to do her bidding. Obama won't do that. He's a smart politican in many ways. I hope he works with the republicans on this "stimulus" / pork spending package.2. February 2009, 06:48:28 Subject: Re: Artful Dodger: HAHAHAHHA.....you silly buggar :) 2. February 2009, 06:47:33 Subject: Re: Artful Dodger: Ok but i'm sure i'll need Bernice's help. 2. February 2009, 06:44:52 Subject: Re: Foxy Lady: Yeah, he can take it too. She's our number one blog subscriber. Wanna join the AD/Czuch fan club here? All ya gotta do is listen to us ramble, and then disagree with us, and then sit back and watch us dismantle your arguments point by point. Then Bernice comes on and puts us in our place and we start all over again. It's great fun! 2. February 2009, 06:41:32 Subject: Re: Artful Dodger: I love it when Bernice lets Chucky have it. 2. February 2009, 06:38:13 Subject: Re: Foxy Lady: You got it right. ;) Yeah politics can be light fun as well as tense. I like it both ways. ;) 2. February 2009, 06:28:37 Subject: Re: Dark Vamp:Hmmmmm guess i got brain fog 2. February 2009, 06:08:11 Subject: Re: Foxy Lady: Nope  2. February 2009, 05:57:06 Subject: Re: Artful Dodger: This board is getting entertaining. Did i spell that right?2. February 2009, 04:46:41 Subject: Re:we are not broke even close to that bad, IMO! Artful Dodger:  yes but you are a smart-ass 2. February 2009, 04:42:14 Subject: Re:we are not broke even close to that bad, IMO! Bernice: I knew what he meant. 2. February 2009, 02:59:29 Subject: Re:we are not broke even close to that bad, IMO! Czuch: i stand corrected LOL2. February 2009, 02:42:14 Subject: Re:we are not broke even close to that bad, IMO! Modified by Czuch (2. February 2009, 02:45:36) Bernice: I use the word broke not to mean monetarily broke, but broken, as in it doesnt work anymore... that our system itself is fine, a blimp on the radar doesnt mean we need any radical changes like socialism will bring. 2. February 2009, 02:24:07 Subject: Re:we are not broke even close to that bad, IMO! Modified by Bernice (2. February 2009, 02:25:40) Czuch:  what you mean is YOUare not broke, and as long as you have the "I'm alright Jack" mentality you don't really care of others.2. February 2009, 02:08:57 Subject: 3-D I was a little disappointed with the 3-D commercials, I thought more things would fly out at you 2. February 2009, 02:08:53 Subject: Re: Bernice: ..Im only trying to stir him up because Ive found over the years it don't take too much damn, I fall for it evrye time too! 2. February 2009, 02:06:00 Subject: Re: Bernice: i hardly care... someone else mentioned they didnt like it to me, and I thought a bit about it, and just wondered if anyone else had felt like that... then I thought about the canadian anthem, which is the next most familiar to me, and i ddnt recall it ever being anything than the stoic version we all know... I dont mind change either, but I like the saying " if it isnt broke, dont fix it" the US has come a long way on the back of capitalism and free markets, with many ups and downs along the way, whats the point in changing that? I dont mind a tweak here and there, changing times and technology etc, but socialism isnt a tweak, its a radically different direction... we are not broke even close to that bad, IMO! 2. February 2009, 02:05:55 Subject: Re: Bernice:Are you sure it's not me you're talking about? 2. February 2009, 02:02:29 Subject: Re: Artful Dodger: rofl....Im only trying to stir him up because Ive found over the years it don't take too much 2. February 2009, 01:59:44 Subject: Re: Bernice: You tell him girl. He won't listen to me. 2. February 2009, 01:58:46 the Aussie anthem get sung different ways by different people also at sporting events....let it go Chuck, you are only jealous of their beautiful voices and it also proves you aren't open to change. 2. February 2009, 01:23:05 Subject: Re: Change the subject.. Czuch:No I'm not a progressive. ;) But when it comes to music, there are certain musical tastes I have that allow for individual expression. Usually I'm a traditionalist when it comes to most things. Music is no exception. But thee is a lot to be said for interpretation and putting emotion into a song. I'd say that when you sing together, you sing it the traditional way. When a solo, you sing it your way (ala Frank Sanatra) 2. February 2009, 01:18:21 Subject: Re: Change the subject.. Artful Dodger: no, you arent sure??? 2. February 2009, 01:17:27 Subject: Re: Change the subject.. Czuch:No but I am a musician and so I probably see it through my musical training more than through my political lens. ;) 2. February 2009, 01:14:02 Subject: Re: Change the subject.. Artful Dodger: The point is that its a traditional kind of song... what if the army started doing it to their marching songs??? You sure you arent a closet progressive liberal? 2. February 2009, 01:03:47 Subject: Re: Change the subject.. Vikings: I see. Well I think for some that's true. Sandy Patty certainly could hold the notes. I've never thought of it as I can't sing either way. I sound like Paul Stooky. 2. February 2009, 01:02:16 Subject: Re: Change the subject.. Czuch: I think it's just a style of singing. Listen to the American Idol contestants that make it. they all do that. 2. February 2009, 00:56:24 And jennifer houston rocked the house. 2. February 2009, 00:53:12 Subject: Re: Change the subject.. Artful Dodger: I missed the songs, I was talking in general, as a musician, singing where they slide all over the scale bugs me I think it takes more talent to hold the note 2. February 2009, 00:52:42 Subject: Re: Change the subject.. Artful Dodger: so you think it is something to celebrate.....something succinctly American, that makes and helps us stand out as a cut above the rest? 2. February 2009, 00:46:28 Subject: Re: Change the subject.. Czuch:Not really. I like they way they sang.  2. February 2009, 00:44:52 Subject: Re: Change the subject.. Artful Dodger: Any recollection of another countries anthem being done like this? 2. February 2009, 00:38:30 Subject: Re: Change the subject.. Vikings: Faith Hill can hold a note for a long time. Have you heard her songs? 2. February 2009, 00:34:49 Subject: Re: Change the subject.. Czuch: I'd normally agree with you on this one,but Hudson lost 3 members of her family recently in a savage attack,if heart and soul have any value,she delivered 2. February 2009, 00:32:57 Subject: Re: Change the subject.. Artful Dodger: I don't, I think songs are sung that way because even tho they have a great voice, they are not capable of holding a note for any amount of time 2. February 2009, 00:31:31 Subject: Re: Jim Dandy: erratic weather patterns are example enough. Erratic patters are common, there is no science to them, thats why the scare tactics about everything melting is a better tactic 2. February 2009, 00:30:57 Subject: Re: Change the subject.. Czuch:I think you're over reacting. A bit. ;) Patriotism is from the heart and singing and interpretation go hand in hand. 2. February 2009, 00:29:57 Subject: Re: Change the subject.. Czuch: Blame Jimmy 2. February 2009, 00:26:41 Subject: Change the subject.. Is it just me??? When did our national anthem become a pop song, ripe for the interpretation of these pop artists who sing them before events??? Sometimes they sound okay, but if you think about it, really, its our national anthem, there is one way it should be sung, and there should be no changing it with artistic impersonations! BTW, do ever hear the Canadian anthem or any other anthems done so differently every time??? NO, you dont, and I dont like it being done to my anthem either, am I over reacting??? 2. February 2009, 00:18:17 Subject: Re: Gitmo Modified by The Col (2. February 2009, 00:23:52) Artful Dodger: I've always been a fan of the KISS method " you know the Germans always make good stuff" http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=Ns4mnmNBk1Y 2. February 2009, 00:06:21 Subject: Re: Gitmo Jim Dandy: He could hold peace conferences with Israel and Hamas "Sham Wow" style.  2. February 2009, 00:03:42 Subject: Re: Gitmo Artful Dodger: If you really want to improve your "image in the world"................hire Vince(the sham wow guy) as Sec of State << < 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |