用户名: 密码:
新用户注册
监管者: SueQ , coan.net 
 Backgammon

Backgammon and variants.

Backgammon Links


每页的消息:
讨论板列表
您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑兵级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。
状态: 所有人能发表
帖子搜索:  

<< <   48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57   > >>
12. 七月 2006, 19:20:49
Chicago Bulls 
题目: Re: Leaving on top?
alanback: I'm presently in the top 5 in all 5 positive gammon games, and there is nobody who is ahead of me in two of them. Anyone else have a better claim?

I have one: I claim that there is a number of years from now that both of us will would not be able to make any more claims....
While many can question your claim nobody can do the same with mine....

12. 七月 2006, 18:32:36
alanback 
题目: Leaving on top?
I've decided to quit playing here and on Dailygammon to save time for other interests. Since I'm finishing my games and tournaments, I'll still be around for quite a while; but as I survey my standings here, it seems to me I have a pretty good claim to be the top player of gammon games (excluding antibackgammon) on the site. I'm presently in the top 5 in all 5 positive gammon games, and there is nobody who is ahead of me in two of them. Anyone else have a better claim?

10. 七月 2006, 20:03:49
Adaptable Ali 
题目: Re:
Hrqls: Yes i posted my post on the Brainking board, and he said the same, but thank you anyway. Lo)

10. 七月 2006, 09:47:11
Hrqls 
题目: Re:
WatfordFC: i asked fencer and he told me that such tournaments (with entry fees (brains)) wont be removed over time .. they will just keep waiting until enough players are signed up

he will fix this so that the tournaments will be removed after time and when that happens then the players will get their entry fees returned to them

9. 七月 2006, 20:25:56
Hrqls 
题目: Re:
WatfordFC: ah ok ... then i dont know either .. good question :)

9. 七月 2006, 19:51:46
Adaptable Ali 
题目: Re:
Hrqls: The brains are deducted as soon as you put your name down for the tournament.

9. 七月 2006, 19:51:07
Adaptable Ali 
题目: Re:
Vikings: Yes i am sorry, i didnt explian it correctly, yes your correct , i was talking about a non-started tournament.

9. 七月 2006, 19:22:42
Hrqls 
题目: Re:
Vikings: lol .. neither do i .. even the 2 of us combined have zero brains ;)

9. 七月 2006, 19:22:00
Vikings 
题目: Re:
Hrqls: don't ask me, I don't have any brains

9. 七月 2006, 19:19:43
Hrqls 
题目: Re:
Vikings: ah! thats true .. never thought about those tournaments which dont start :)

when does the player actually pay the brains ? when the tournament starts or when (s)he signs up ?

9. 七月 2006, 19:18:29
Vikings 
题目: Re:
Hrqls: I think that she is talking about tournements that some people sign up for that never get enough people to start and eventually time out on the tournement page

9. 七月 2006, 19:13:21
Hrqls 
题目: Re:
WatfordFC: when doesnt a game go ahead ? does a game ever stop without giving a winner & loser or as a draw ?

9. 七月 2006, 12:37:47
Adaptable Ali 
If you sign up to a game where brains are required for the entry fee, and the game doesnt go ahead, do you get your brains refunded?

6. 七月 2006, 13:42:20
lovelysharon 
we made many moves per day.. .lol... took a lot less than 22 years.. lol ... also was over way before any action points...

6. 七月 2006, 02:10:06
Kili 
题目: Re:
grenv: I hope that you are a good mathematician who do bad sums

6. 七月 2006, 02:02:33
grenv 
题目: Re:
Matarilevich: Yes. April 12, 2052

6. 七月 2006, 02:00:20
Kili 
题目: Re:
grenv: Could you calculate the end of this match?

6. 七月 2006, 01:55:47
grenv 
题目: Re:
Matarilevich: 3 days per move x 996 x 2 + vacation = about 22 years. Good thing they moved a little quicker, but still.

6. 七月 2006, 01:51:42
Kili 
题目: Re:
WatfordFC: 996 x 2 = 1992 + win = 1997 points for $$$ Jason $$$

6. 七月 2006, 01:48:10
Adaptable Ali 
题目: Re:
Matarilevich: OMG!! lol WOW

6. 七月 2006, 01:44:09
Kili 
题目: Re:
WatfordFC: Maybe Jason us Sharon 996 moves

6. 七月 2006, 01:38:32
Adaptable Ali 
Does anybody know what the most moves in anti-backgammon is??

5. 七月 2006, 22:10:00
jryden 
题目: Re: illegal move?
grenv: Okay, I didn't consider that distinction. I was just looking a the bug list and saw a similar comment about it related to crowded. Well then, good for me :)

5. 七月 2006, 22:05:59
skipinnz 
题目: Re: illegal move?
jryden:not illegeal as you used both dice , just good luck you could bear off.

5. 七月 2006, 22:04:51
grenv 
题目: Re: illegal move?
jryden: It is not an error. The rules say you have to use both dice, but there is no rule that says you need to move the maximum number of pips.

5. 七月 2006, 22:00:13
jryden 
题目: illegal move?
I don't think I should have been allowed to move 6-4 4-off in this game since I could have moved 6-1 3-1 and used all seven points on the dice. However, the system did let me swap the dice and do 6-4, 4-off. Is this an error?

http://brainking.com/en/ShowGame?g=1724204&i=16

2. 七月 2006, 12:39:59
dameningen 

1. 七月 2006, 06:13:38
TJ 
I love backgammon. If anyone wants to play just send me an invitation.

15. 六月 2006, 19:16:41
Pbarb2 
题目: Re: HI Question.
rod03801: Oh, I'm sorry. I never thought of that. That is what it was. Thanks Rod..
BARB

15. 六月 2006, 19:01:11
rod03801 
题目: Re: HI Question.
Pbarb2: I just looked at your "Last 10 completed games" list, and I don't see any hyper games since the 12th. Are you sure they weren't part of multi-game matches???? BKR isn't affected until the end of the match. Look at the PM's you received at the end of the games.

15. 六月 2006, 18:51:05
Pbarb2 
题目: HI Question.
How often are the ratings posted? I just noticed I won 2 hyper games and nothing changed. Then I lost a game still nothing. It has been a few hours now .. I don't know much about the ratings..Just thought it unusual. Thanks
BARB

3. 六月 2006, 22:36:24
Hrqls 
题目: Re: How strong?
Pason69: i play both on here as well as on dailygammon as well .. the players there often annihilate me :)

the good thing of this site though is that there are a lot of different games to play .. this is an allround game site while other sites concentrate on mainly 1 game type

3. 六月 2006, 18:07:30
Pason69 
题目: Re: How strong?
gogul: Thanks! I like it here and find the competition ok. Was just curious about the level. Will probably try DG as well. It's always fun to develop!

3. 六月 2006, 15:36:59
gogul 
题目: Re: How strong?
Pason69: You´ll find more familiary games to play here (which does not mean you´ll find weak players), since it´s difficult as a rook to choose your opponents upon their rating if you play a lot of tournaments like you and most do. Allmost 1000 players is not a enourmous community, so you´ll find less top-players. But compaired to life you´ll find more players at your level on net and here also. It´s difficult to compare the sites, the rating system are different. If you surch to play against experienced players probably FIBS is a good adress.
I like the Galore sites for further questions about the game, it would not make sence to reinvent the wheel on every backgammon-site :)

3. 六月 2006, 15:17:00
SafariGal 
题目: Re: How strong?
Pason69: it is far weaker here than some sites such as http://www.dailygammon.com. at DG they talk A LOT about tactics and really analyse a lot of games as the site is totally dedicated to backgammon.. Brainking is more of a chat site and if you are after serious backgammon, this is not a good place. The boards here have basically no analytical information whatsoever

3. 六月 2006, 15:12:33
Pason69 
题目: How strong?
Hi everybody!

My guess is there is an answer ofr this somewhere, but I can't find it... How strong is the BG-community here compared to other sites? Compared to live? Since I only played it on the net, I have no idea. In eg chess, it's easy to compare the rating of a few known players net & live rating and get an idea of the level of play and how strong the site is. Are there anything like that in BG as well?!

Thanks in advance!

1. 六月 2006, 08:53:28
Hrqls 
题目: Re: Observation
alanback: oops .. you are correct :)

31. 五月 2006, 22:39:11
alanback 
题目: Re: Observation
Hrqls: Not by my arithmetic!

31. 五月 2006, 09:47:15
Hrqls 
题目: Re: Observation
alanback: if it were not for #6 then it would also be true for #1-#7 :)

working to get ruin the list though ;)

31. 五月 2006, 08:48:55
Thad 
题目: Re: Observation

31. 五月 2006, 02:16:46
SafariGal 
题目: Re: Observation
alanback: established BKR only. If you count non established one player ruins it.

Very keen observation alanback

31. 五月 2006, 02:07:09
alanback 
题目: Observation
At this moment in time (approx. 0100 GMT on May 31), each player in the backgammon rankings from #2 to #5 has more experience than all the players above him/her combined.

21. 五月 2006, 15:40:13
Czuch 
题目: Re:
grenv: Sometimes I have signed up for one day/move games, and have played my moves in the morning then when I leave for the day the game/tournament started, and by the time I come back to the site the next morning,, I have timed out, without ever knowing that the game had even started yet! That is very frustrating for someone who plays fast and is here everyday!

21. 五月 2006, 15:03:54
grenv 
题目: Re:
SafariGal: I'm just annoyed that I play every day, yet time out in 8 games all of a sudden. Then I have to wait months for certain opponents to move.

21. 五月 2006, 14:52:08
SafariGal 
题目: Re:
grenv: I am, in a round about way. But the time controls do bring some excellent options, but some people abuse them

21. 五月 2006, 14:51:16
grenv 
题目: Re:
SafariGal: i think you're making the same point as me. :)

21. 五月 2006, 14:07:42
SafariGal 
题目: Re:
grenv: but if you add 3 hours then as long as you make 8 moves in a day you are fine and should always run at a buffer of at least 24 hours. You should be playing once every 15 minutes all day every day !!!

This person plays every 15 minutes. You should play like this. (refer to bug link)
http://brainking.com/en/ReadBug?bgi=840

21. 五月 2006, 14:02:54
grenv 
题目: Re:
SafariGal: And I play ALL the time.

21. 五月 2006, 14:02:40
grenv 
题目: Re:
SafariGal: It was a tournament, and really with adding only 3 hours, once you run out of time it's impossible to keep up unless you don't sleep. Whoever goes to sleep first loses.

21. 五月 2006, 14:01:09
SafariGal 
题目: Re:
grenv: but it does give some of us the added option of finally playing fast games and not having to wait sometimes months to make a single move. Just a matter of being careful. I always make sure my opponent knows when they are playing a very very fast game with me

<< <   48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57   > >>
日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有
回顶端