 |
|
 Feature requestsDo you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board! If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board. For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html 您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑兵级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。 状态: 所有人能发表
<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 30. 八月 2004, 20:03:38 题目: Andersp This is a public board, as a member of said public I would like an explanation of that post. 30. 八月 2004, 19:54:56 题目: Stevie Nothing to do with blame, you're here, I dont want you to go. In an international community of several thousand members each member tolerates some things for the sake of enjoying the community. 30. 八月 2004, 16:27:05 题目: MidnightMcMedic In the case you gave one game could be agreed drawn. 30. 八月 2004, 16:26:06 题目: Purple In such a case the player putting up the game would be doing the deleting, it still sounds irresponsible to me but preferable to the case of a player accepting games from the waiting games page and then deleting them. If your point is a valid one the use of "delete" could be confined to the game's proposer and denied to it's acceptor. 30. 八月 2004, 16:15:58 If we're on such good terms what's wrong with playing two at once? 30. 八月 2004, 16:07:46 I request the removal of the "delete game" facility. I cant understand what on Earth it's for apart from to increase the scope for annoying behaviour. There are even games in which a player can have a lost position after their first move yet they can delete on the second. If a player doesn't want to play what are they accepting games for? The delete games facility encourages irresponsibility, it's meaningless nonsense. 29. 八月 2004, 11:35:15 You want to spend another day beating this particular dead horse?? 29. 八月 2004, 05:09:48 Here's one for kokusaisannin shogi: http://www.ne.jp/asahi/tetsu/toybox/kapitan/kp040.htm 29. 八月 2004, 05:07:16 Here's a link for yonnin shogi: http://www.ffortune.net/play/bgame/syogi2/4syogi.htm 29. 八月 2004, 05:04:01 Okay, that site's chaturanga looks different from my memory of it. I'll see if I can find Murray's entry. 29. 八月 2004, 04:37:37 That's that then. What about dice chaturanga, same rules as dice chess? 29. 八月 2004, 04:13:04 You think it's better for BrainKing to have this interminable insistence that Fencer do something that he's already said he will not do? 29. 八月 2004, 04:00:16 It's already 11am here, I dont know what it is for Andersp, what odds are you offering that I dont outlast him? 29. 八月 2004, 03:48:47 Kindly express your sympathy practically, stop subjecting me to your trivial insistence that you be accomodated regardless. 29. 八月 2004, 03:35:27 I suppose you will too, that's insufficient by which to arbitrate the worth of my post's content. I see the point of auto-pass, I also recognise Fencer's groundbreaking acheivement with this site is membership involvement and you as a member are reducing my enjoyment of the site with this crap. Fencer has said "no", it's an easy word/concept to understand, you must've been familiar with it since your pre-speech era, why are you still going on about it? 29. 八月 2004, 03:16:57 题目: Andersp Thanks for making the site more fun by continually harping on about AUTO-PASS!! 29. 八月 2004, 03:05:03 题目: Danoschek Good one with the Chaturanga, there are also shogi variants for three and four people which would be nice to eventually have available. 29. 八月 2004, 02:13:24 Sure, the possibilities exist. In the waiting games area do we need half a dozen different species for any passable game? Tell me why it's worth the fuss. I prefer simplicity, if I have to decide all sorts of this and that everytime I play a game, I'll end up?playing atomic chess or something. 29. 八月 2004, 01:55:13 I'm not harrassing anyone, as a site member I'm the one under attack. 29. 八月 2004, 01:54:04 题目: BigBadWolf As I said, the player with no move may want to exercise an option such as offering a draw. Even though they have no move, in the case of backgammon, probability may be strongly in their favour, accordingly the player able to move might accept a draw (are there agreed draws in backgammon?) anyway, you get my drift. 29. 八月 2004, 01:39:23 It's not about diffuse puberty rituals of fixative proving whatever, it's about, inter alia, football chess. The trivialisation of this board on the "question" of auto-pass means that the majority will not see the posts of either you or me that made genuine suggestions to improve the site. I hope that Bumble or Red Dragon have the patience and dilligence to delete all the auto-pass crap and leave just those pertinent posts. 29. 八月 2004, 01:30:09 题目: Danoschek By "no" I take it you meant A+S were the bitches. 29. 八月 2004, 00:58:13 题目: Danoschek If you mean me, I'm not bitching, that characterises the behaviour of AndersP and Stevie. I'm quite tired of coming to this board to read about this nonsense so I'd like to kill it today. 29. 八月 2004, 00:40:31 题目: Stevie It's a question of manners, this is a social site, I dont want people deciding what I do, I might be contemplating resignation or the offer of a draw. 29. 八月 2004, 00:38:21 It really doesn't matter to me either way, I dont understand why it's so crucial for you(?) If you're short of games to move in you can stick with shorter time limits or stick another 90 challenges in the waiting games, it's just not a big problem, is it? 29. 八月 2004, 00:30:54 题目: Stevie Never knew you felt like that about me! I think it's absurd to imagine that you decide when your opponent moves, the height of bad manners, the only way I can see to do it is to have two versions of all games that have pass situations, auto-pass on or off. 28. 八月 2004, 23:59:25 Fine, I dont usually bother answering but this time it was persistent and not new members. 28. 八月 2004, 23:20:23 Apart from football chess, I'd like to see dice-chess, that should be fairly easy to add(?) 28. 八月 2004, 23:13:10 You cant expect to auto-pass your opponent's moves, can you? So it won't speed the game up any further than the 3-4 seconds it takes you yourself to pass. Are you people really serious about this? So much talk about something so completely unimportant, incredible, "read a book". 28. 八月 2004, 22:01:41 There is no reason to believe the majority want auto-pass, it's the same few who bring it up. As a feature request I'd like to ask for no more posts on this trivial and boring subject. 28. 八月 2004, 08:52:15 How about a BrainKing social archives page? Detailing developments good and bad, for the amusement of future members. For example the rise and fall of KM with details of it's structure and the roles of it's officers would be fascinating, no real ids need be used. 26. 八月 2004, 18:27:46 I dont want my opponents auto-passing for me and that was Summertop's suggestion. 19. 八月 2004, 23:43:42 I hope Fencer doesn't care but it's not my problem. Bush or Kerry are also not my problem. 19. 八月 2004, 23:32:49 题目: Fencer How about making a board for discussion of "political" topics? But make it czech only. << < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> |
日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有 回顶端 |