BrainKing - 讨论板 (Checkers)

题目: Re: Violations of Guidelines

Gabriel Almeida: You can see what is missing. Now I am asking you to follow the guidelines as well as everyone else.

23. 十二月 2006, 21:03:31

题目: Re: Violations of Guidelines

Purple: who were?

23. 十二月 2006, 21:02:46

题目: Violations of Guidelines

A few people have now been hidden or banned. There has been plenty of warning. There won't be any more.

23. 十二月 2006, 20:47:02

题目: And the poblem is...

I’m sure some players with good ratings don’t cheat. They are: Ferjo, Sobek, Undertaker, Faethon, Wismazstr, Fontal... Only Undertaker is rook. Well, do someone think Fencer would banish brain knight or brain rook? I don’t think so. These are the rules, and those who doesn't like them should go...

(I think that's what I'll do... anyway, I've seen this happenning in IYT, Chu thought the same way as Fencer is doing now. Nowadays, IYT is a "desert island". I hope BK history be different...)

23. 十二月 2006, 20:40:50

sobek

To Bruno Jesus:
You have nice nick and I think, that You know more that you beyond type. Draughts/Checkers is mysterious game with complicated history and mistery. Cheaters never understand this game! Merry Xmas and Happy New Year and I hope, that we meet in really on-line server. Bye all.

23. 十二月 2006, 20:38:50

题目: Re:

Bruno Jesus: You would invite me also,If I was a beautifull woman as Stardust... snif, snif... nobody want's to play with me... eheheh

23. 十二月 2006, 20:27:07

题目: Re:

Katchaturian: So do I...

23. 十二月 2006, 20:17:42

题目: Re:

Stardust: Hum... depending of whoe they atack, maybe we should give them a little cake... eheheh.

Stardust, it's so easy to understand all this, isn't it? Misteryo is telling the truth, only "the cheatting business" is not allowed here.I also think Pedro Martinez offended Sobek (well, I don't speak very well english too, and if Martinez have told that to me, I would be offended). But what Idon't uderstand it's just... why don't anyone seems to understand those obvious things? My point goes to Fencer and global mod's: are they sleeping?

23. 十二月 2006, 20:08:17

题目: Re: BKR system

Mysterio619: I don't think so! Poor Ustica, he must feel offended for a lot of things people say here!

23. 十二月 2006, 20:06:20

题目: Re: BKR system

Gabriel Almeida: Thank you but I was agreeing with Mysterio619! And it's easy to see when you've been on the inside lol

23. 十二月 2006, 20:04:06

题目: Re: BKR system

Stardust: Oh no, my beautiful friend! You see very,very well! Better than a lot of us! ;)

23. 十二月 2006, 20:01:32

题目: Re: BKR system

Mysterio619: here here!!

23. 十二月 2006, 19:57:18

题目: Re: BKR system

Mysterio619: Purple can speak english, he doesn't need a txtbook, so he hasn't feel offended with Martinez's words... ;)

23. 十二月 2006, 19:50:00

题目: Re: BKR system

sobek: This system is good for the kind of players we have here, sobek. Interested in a position, even if it means nothing.

Anyway, a bad rating system is unfair, but not so much as using programs, or asking friends to play their games.

Oh, and Stardust is right: who cares about BKR? In a "place" where people get happy for winning for timeout, it's everything already said! Once again, "BK system" supports that, there's no option to ask to our oponnent to re-instate the game...

(Maybe Fencer have been too much time in USA, and really catched their ideas...)

23. 十二月 2006, 19:43:17

题目: Re: BKR system

Mysterio619: We review and try to delete any inappropriate posts. I did not see anyone making fun of anyone so I am not clear what your objection is. Whatever the issue it should be taken up in PM's to myself, co-mods or Globals. Not posted here.

23. 十二月 2006, 19:40:00

题目: Re: BKR system

Mysterio619: Only a few players are "silenced" here. Even glob mod's keep on with Mr. Purple "way" (or politics). There are a few couples and friends keeping "Brainking System" (that's like in politic, precisly), and other ones are silenced or ignored.

This is all about Checkers! There are some "strategic pieces", and than the others. The first ones command the game...

22. 十二月 2006, 22:20:14

题目: Re:

Gabriel Almeida: Yes

22. 十二月 2006, 13:42:05

题目: Re:

Grandmaestro: Kurnik?

22. 十二月 2006, 12:07:43

题目: Re: My 2 cents

david upshaw: I think you would be surprised at how much it does happen because there are people who have made cheating the actual game.

22. 十二月 2006, 09:03:01

There is a gamesite which has 99.9% cheating protection for checkers and other games.

22. 十二月 2006, 06:36:22

david upshaw

题目: Re: My 2 cents

Gr☺uch☺: I agree. Ratings aren't important when compared to family, job security, or personal health, but it is fun to see your ratings jump after a tough win. I can't understand how anyone can enjoy cheating to win, but it happens. I don't think it happens often because cheaters get bored and move on.

22. 十二月 2006, 02:59:34

题目: Re: My 2 cents

Gr☺uch☺: Yes,I see what you're saying and I agree to a degree. It's just that some people cheat, lie or steal to be at the top of the chart. They aren't there because they are the best at their particular game. I guess it's finding a balance between playing for fun and playing for 'points'.
What has turned me off is the fact that a person's true rating isn't known because of the players who cheat the system.

21. 十二月 2006, 21:53:58

Papa Zoom

题目: Re: My 2 cents

Stardust: It's an achievement. A trophy. I play for the fun of it but BKR is important to me. Some games I don't play so well. But where I am good (or decent) then the BKR is a testament to that ;)

21. 十二月 2006, 21:05:21

题目: My 2 cents

Why is bkr so important anyway? We are not all on an even playing field. Ever since I learned of the many many people (or should I say accounts) that cheat to boost their ratings,my bkr means nothing to me. I know that if I play a few select friends who I know are not using programs or multiple nics to boost their rating that whether I win,lose or draw,I'm satisfied with a good game played.
whatever happened to playing for the fun of it?

21. 十二月 2006, 08:32:34

sobek

题目: BKR system

Pedro Martinez: nice bedtime story " BKR system to be restructured", even cock and bull story :-))
BKR is very, very bad system. Sample: Nick Klaun played and won 5 games. One opponent has BKR cca 1800 and for between 1100-1400. And Klaun has BKR 2121 :-)))))). Suggestion: new nick, more time win with weak opponent and You will be King in BrainKing :-)))))

21. 十二月 2006, 02:22:09

题目: Reminder

No personal attacks. Please confine your posts to checkers.

20. 十二月 2006, 17:02:23

题目: Re:

Pedro Martínez: Because cheating doesn't look to be a problem in Brainking... noone cares about it!

20. 十二月 2006, 14:04:28

Pedro Martínez

题目: Re:

Grandmaestro: Like I said, you should have paid better attention to the time control. If you had, you wouldn't have timed out. It was only your own fault. Wanting the whole BKR system to be restructured because of your own mistakes is a bit brassy. By the way, there are no payed memberships on BrainKing. None of the available ones have anything to do with ropes either.

Gabriel Almeida: No, he can't. At least not if he wants to honor the User Agreement. I actually don't understand why are you inciting him to do so...:(

20. 十二月 2006, 12:15:51

题目: Re:

Grandmaestro: You can always "forget" your actual membership, and begin another, even with the same name!

20. 十二月 2006, 08:29:54

Especially for payed members.

I know I'm not a payed member.

20. 十二月 2006, 08:29:25

题目: Re:

Pedro Martínez: The games were 14 hours per move without days off. I didn't pay attention to the "no days off" and I timed out over the weekend. If I knew it was no days off I wouldn't of timed out!

There should be an option to reset one's own BKR anyways.

19. 十二月 2006, 21:29:25

Pedro Martínez

题目: Re:

Grandmaestro: Knowing that, you should have paid better attention to the time control of those games...*shrugs*

18. 十二月 2006, 06:34:04

题目: Re:

david upshaw: It's fine. It will just take longer than it would of to be high rated. First 4 games in this rating system are the most important to getting a good head start.

18. 十二月 2006, 05:17:35

david upshaw

题目: Re:

被david upshaw修改(18. 十二月 2006, 05:18:27)

Grandmaestro: I don't think so. What if all the people you beat went back to "unrated"? It wouldn't be fair to your record. Ratings wouldn't be worth anything if we could simply reset them. Thats just my opinion. If you want an offical answer send the question to Fencer.

18. 十二月 2006, 05:07:40

david upshaw

题目: Re: hello all

pattypoo: Thank you pattypoo.

14. 十二月 2006, 00:03:37

pattypoo

题目: Re: hello all

david upshaw, welcome aboard.. Good to have you here. Just quit beating me in the checker games.

13. 十二月 2006, 16:11:19

Is it possible to reset your own BKR(s) back to default "unrated" state.

12. 十二月 2006, 23:42:50

gooner

Lets all play with each other instead of being big headed

6. 十二月 2006, 18:11:18

ustica tnp

题目: Re: hello all

B L I T Z M E:I don t no who you are. but i look in my winning list and i see your name there. if you wanna play, play with your rank.
note! no Advertising. becose

ciao.

6. 十二月 2006, 16:39:43

题目: Tiger Checkers Club

Purple: Hi, Purple. I write this here because I can't PM you. Must be such a problem in my computer. Can I join that fellowship? I've noticed some checkers players are in that fellowship, maybe I could learn more about the game with you. I saw (also) that our mods in this DB are the most active members of it, so... it's almost a "second home" for checkers players.
Unfortunatelly, a lot of great checkers players are not here (and there), I still don't know why (I have my opinion about that, but nevermind...), but I hope this can change. I dream with that glorious day when We will be all great friends, again! As a family!
Best regards, my good friend!

6. 十二月 2006, 16:22:20