用户名: 密码:
新用户注册
监管者: Chaos 
 Espionage

For all Espionage fans


每页的消息:
讨论板列表
您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑兵级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。
状态: 所有人能发表
帖子搜索:  

18. 八月 2011, 14:46:49
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: stalemate
Dark Prince: OK, I got confused by those quotation marks.

18. 八月 2011, 14:34:37
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: stalemate
Dark Prince: Where exactly at BK is that rule written or referred to?

7. 二月 2011, 19:11:26
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: Time to Reverse illegal move
Dark Prince: Unless Fencer is on a vacation or something, the reversal will definitely not take longer than a few days.
I believe your assumption would be correct indeed. The problem with undesired identification of pieces would have to be taken as an inevitable side effect though.

7. 二月 2011, 18:19:18
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: illegal move
Dark Prince, Chaos:

Have such moves been reversed?
Yes, they have.

How long does it take?
It depends on the method of reporting the illegal move. It takes Fencer much less time (and effort) if reported to him directly via PM than if reported in the BugTracker (or at least this is what my experience tells me).

What happens if unidentified pieces become identified as a result of the illegal move?
I have no idea. Good question though. :)

7. 二月 2011, 17:03:01
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: illegal move
Pedro Martínez修改(7. 二月 2011, 17:04:27)
Chaos: Well, people who have accounts and play at BK are deemed to have agreed to the User Agreement and to the rules of all games that are played here. My understanding is that when my opponent (or anyone else on this site) makes an illegal move (i.e. a move which is not in agreement with the rules applicable to BK games), I am fully entitled to require the management to have such a move reversed. Therefore, I think the list of “obligated players” is rather redundant since they are obligated to that effect (not to make illegal moves) already.

7. 二月 2011, 16:47:33
Pedro Martínez 
Pedro Martínez修改(7. 二月 2011, 16:47:43)
So, umm, what happens if an “obligated player” makes an illegal move?

7. 二月 2011, 01:10:42
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: Retracing
Pedro Martínez修改(7. 二月 2011, 01:11:43)
Dark Prince: No worries, it will have been fixed with the introduction of BK 3.0… which is expected to take place very soon… or has been for the past two years…

22. 八月 2010, 20:18:23
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: just a reminder
Pedro Martínez修改(22. 八月 2010, 20:19:59)
Pedro Martínez: And the German version is even stricter:

Generelle Regeln: (gelten für Spiele und Diskussionsforen)

1. Jeder Spieler auf BrainKing darf nur einen Account haben. Multiple Accounts sind verboten und können zum Ausschluss führen.

[General Rules: (to be applied to games and discussion forums)

1. Each BrainKing player may only have one account. Multiple accounts are prohibited and may lead to a ban.]

22. 八月 2010, 19:50:48
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: just a reminder
Vikings: The Czech version says this:

Základní pravidla: (aplikovaná na celém serveru)

1. Každému hráči je povoleno mít právě jedno registrované konto. Používání více kont stejnou osobou, především za účelem umělého zvyšování hodnocení pomocí úmyslně prohraných her je považováno za nesportovní a podobné chování nebude tolerováno.

[General Rules: (applicable throughout the site)

1. Each user is allowed to have only one registered account. Use of multiple accounts by one person, in particular with the view of boosting ratings by losing games intentionally, shall be regarded as unsportsmanlike, and such conduct shall not be tolerated.]

Now I wonder which version takes precedence?

28. 四月 2010, 19:02:43
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re:
Nothingness: Take a 3-day bank and do the same math you did with the 10-day bank. I guarantee you will arrive at the same results. It's actually the bonus what the key is. The bonus tells you the average speed with which you need to move without timing out. With both 3-day and 10-day bank, you need to move, on average, 1 move per day (if the bonus is 1 day), so the total length of the game will stay the same.

26. 四月 2010, 22:17:00
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re:
Nothingness: What espionage freaks site?

23. 四月 2010, 15:37:33
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re:
lukulus: OK, got it. I would use “apply” or “use” instead of “plug in,” but it's just me being me there. :) However, the idea of volcano ash should be taken up! Maybe it can be used to shoot down the skydivers…

23. 四月 2010, 15:08:47
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re:
lukulus: Do I understand it correctly that “rejecting an aerial” is a response of sorts to an aerial ejected by the opponent, preventing the effect of the opponent's aerial?

21. 十二月 2009, 11:07:42
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: Resher
Resher: You will definitely not upset me if you stay in the tournament. Having the experience of a number of ongoing espionage games against you and having seen your finished games (and knowing you would have won them easily even if completed “normally”), I was just surprised when I saw you listed as a beginner. That's it. No hard feelings.

21. 十二月 2009, 08:24:24
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re:
Nothingness: OK. Obviously you haven't seen any of his games.

21. 十二月 2009, 03:36:36
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: Espionage Beginners Tournament- BIG prizes to be won!
SL-Mark: So Resher is a beginner?

25. 八月 2009, 08:50:27
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: one game for each two players
Dark Prince: Yes. It is a bad translation. It should read "Round-robin, one game against each opponent."

25. 八月 2009, 02:12:12
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: Are the tournament games rated?
Dark Prince: That is correct.

16. 三月 2005, 14:46:50
Pedro Martínez 

2. 三月 2005, 03:52:37
Pedro Martínez 
题目: Re: confused
Backgammonfan28: This never happened to me...are you sure you attacked the 5 with your sapper and not a spy?

28. 二月 2005, 17:03:03
Pedro Martínez 
Hercules - yes, 2700 is the maximum BKR.

28. 二月 2005, 17:02:30
Pedro Martínez 
BuilderQ is correct. That is the formula used here for computing BKRs. I translated it into Czech for Fencer so I know.

24. 二月 2005, 01:18:17
Pedro Martínez 
ROOK! ROOK! ROOK! ROOK! ROOK!

日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有
回顶端