 |
|
 Chess variants (8x8)including Amazon, Anti, Atomic, Berolina, Corner, Crazy Screen, Cylinder, Dark, Extinction, Fischer Random, Fortress, Horde, Knight Relay, Legan, Loop, Maharajah, Screen, Three Checks For posting: - invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu) - information about upcoming tournaments - discussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position ... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted) - links to interesting related sites (non-promotional) Community Announcements: - Nasmichael is helping to co-ordinate the Fischer Random Chess Email Chess (FRCEC) Club and can set up quad or trio games if you send him a PM here. 您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑兵级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。 状态: 所有人能发表
1. 七月 2005, 22:05:09 题目: Re: thai chess Fencer: yes - that's how it's called
on chess variants dot com - just checked ... ~*~ 30. 六月 2005, 21:28:39 题目: thai chess anyone seen that variation ?
all pawns are one step ahead in start position - saw an article in the eurpa rochade magazine. ~*~ 15. 五月 2005, 21:19:35 题目: Re: infinite move numbers ? rabbitoid: you expressed it much better by pointing that a piece
must move to an un-occupied square - I enjoy to see the group intelligence which is even higher than mine is lightly capable of fixing the prob ... ~*~ .  15. 五月 2005, 02:52:39 题目: Re: passing a move ? 被danoschek修改(15. 五月 2005, 03:02:07) Walter Montego: yes you don't see. like I don't see the admittably
challenging boardlogic complying with chess rules either ... btw it was me who urged to repairing the en passant cross the border too - fixed already ... ~*~ . 15. 五月 2005, 01:10:37 题目: Re: infinite move numbers ? 被danoschek修改(15. 五月 2005, 01:11:54) Sumerian: actually the logic is violated beyond too, I agree ...
I assume we both know the chess riddles that challenge one to reconstruct the history of a game by a given end position ... ~*~ 15. 五月 2005, 00:56:18 题目: Re: passing a move ? Sumerian: indeed it would theoretically suspend stalemate as well ... it's humbug. ~*~ 15. 五月 2005, 00:44:19 题目: yeah halma and next bowling eh ? it's chess - you all might have forgotten ... ~*~ 14. 五月 2005, 15:22:15 题目: Re: Re: rabbitoid: checkers oogh ... still the position has changed ... it's a flaw period ~*~ 14. 五月 2005, 14:11:14 题目: Re: Re: reza: Ra5-a5 is no legitimate MOVE - you are absolutely right - a move has
a start square and a different destination square, that is its definition ... ~*~ 21. 三月 2005, 20:20:04 题目: Re: ooops :D WhisperzQ: eheh !
hard to explain ... don't you think this single knight unveiling the weakness of joined forces is pure beauty ?  .. ~*~20. 三月 2005, 17:00:35 题目: Re: ooops :D WhisperzQ: sorry I meant
'pure pattern' thanks for correcting ... ~*~ 17. 三月 2005, 01:22:30 题目: ooops :D settings changed ...  ... - and I too think three
boards could go as one fisher/corner/fortress that is ... last not least, avoiding chessfree bubbles,here a cornergame with a pure mate ... ~*~ 14. 三月 2005, 19:15:08 题目: oh right we have no fisherboard yet ... :) 被danoschek修改(14. 三月 2005, 19:17:04) http://brainking.com/game/ArchivedGame?g=125085
I can't fully compete with the beauty of your pattern, but okay - effective as well ... . ~*~15. 二月 2005, 21:08:19 题目: Re: Janus verses Gothic 被danoschek修改(15. 二月 2005, 21:08:54) mahavrilla: I believe that tempered capablanca chess appears
to have a higher potential than janus ... but the majority of games here doesn't reflect all the strategic options properly, coffeehouse style mainly. ~*~ 14. 二月 2005, 01:44:00 题目: Re: evolving chess beyond random mahavrilla: I do have. Similar thoughts
have been expressend in 8 decades without the doom coming indeed. Creativity will prevail. ~*~ 30. 一月 2005, 01:08:22 题目: redsales looking forward.  your call
and don't forget - any "invincible" position
for black can't be too bad for white either ...  ... ... ~*~25. 七月 2004, 05:48:12 题目: well redsales, let me bet 被danoschek修改(25. 七月 2004, 05:49:57) if you'd have had one, for sure the same position would be not worse for white. *grin* ~*~ 8. 七月 2004, 20:30:07 题目: crazy screen chess setup poker 被danoschek修改(8. 七月 2004, 20:35:48) there's a probability ot 12.5 % that white mates
an opponent with average setup in only 4 moves. ~*~ 4. 八月 2003, 09:33:56 题目: hey you pouty ... and what about atomic
and the merciless whispering ? grrrr :P ~*~ |
日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
|
|
监管者: 
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有 回顶端 |