用户名: 密码:
新用户注册
监管者: Walter Montego 
 Chess

Chess Discussion

For posting:
- invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu or go straight to the Chess Invitation)
- information about upcoming tournaments
- discussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position ... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted)
- links to interesting related sites (non-promotional)


每页的消息:
讨论板列表
您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑兵级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。
状态: 所有人能发表
帖子搜索:  

13. 十月 2006, 21:46:55
gambler104 
题目: Re: the players are not treated equally
435152: I don't see how you can claim that the better player did not win. Kramnik won despite the fact that he forfeited a game. I think he deserved to win.

6. 十月 2006, 02:54:08
gambler104 
题目: Re:
bengood24: That's probably the best argument against cheating. He could have lost the first game and should have done no better than drawn it and in game two, he was just dead lost.

5. 十月 2006, 05:06:11
gambler104 
题目: Re: world chess championship crisis
mctrivia: Ok. But if I read discussion correctly, the issue was over outside help that he could have received in the bathroom (cell phone). However, it really doesn't make much sense. They have refreshments at the events and that could cause the problem.

4. 十月 2006, 14:31:01
gambler104 
题目: Re: world chess championship crisis
435152: athletes usually take drugs to enhance physical performance. I don't see how this would help Kramnik.

2. 十月 2006, 00:57:19
gambler104 
题目: Re: world chess championship crisis
435152: Why would Kramnik take drugs?

1. 十月 2006, 01:45:27
gambler104 
题目: Re:
naughtypawn: I think it is pretty stupid and trivial to delay a world championship.

日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有
回顶端