用户名: 密码:
新用户注册
监管者: Vikings 
 Poker

Discuss about all online poker variants.

  • Poker Tables
  • Rules for Texas Hold'em



  • 每页的消息:
    讨论板列表
    您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑兵级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。
    状态: 所有人能发表
    帖子搜索:  

    << <   3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12   > >>
    18. 十一月 2009, 18:26:35
    gborland 
    BK's poker has bugs to do with caching and some players having out-of-date information. This could explain all the strange things you've been seeing.

    17. 十一月 2009, 18:37:25
    Bwild 
    5 monthes now....waiting for a total site re-write
    wtf

    17. 十一月 2009, 18:36:00
    Bwild 
    1:31:42) Aknell calls 20.
    (11:31:42) Dealer calculates the winner(s).
    (11:31:43) Aknell wins the pot with a pair of jacks. The kicker card is ace.
    (11:31:43) Aknell wins 120 chips (main pot).

    17. 十一月 2009, 18:35:01
    Bwild 
    this is a load!
    I had a flush...but my opponent wins with a pair???

    13. 十一月 2009, 16:31:59
    Bwild 
    when will we see tournament play?

    13. 十一月 2009, 16:30:30
    Bwild 
    why does the big blind have to play double after an all in?

    13. 十一月 2009, 16:29:41
    Bwild 
    why does the dealer show me I have 2 pair, yet my opponent wins with a pair?

    13. 十一月 2009, 14:48:22
    MyTurnNow 
    why on the list of tables does it show observers, but when you enter the room there's no one there?

    10. 十月 2009, 03:49:27
    Bwild 

    8. 十月 2009, 19:13:39
    Bwild 

    8. 十月 2009, 01:11:59
    ennukene00 
    Propirit use

    7. 十月 2009, 14:02:26
    gborland 
    题目: Poker bugs
    gborland修改(7. 十月 2009, 14:07:22)
    I often find the poker page displays wrong or out-of-date stuff. For example, it shows me in Under-The-Gun position, but then skips right over me and the bet moves to the next person before I am given a chance to act.

    I do a full refresh of the page, and it then shows that I'm actually in the Dealer position for that hand, but by the time it's all reloaded, my hand has timed out.

    I just lost a hand with KK in the hole, because this stupid bug caused a time-out while I was waiting for the refresh.

    4. 十月 2009, 00:26:11
    Bwild 

    27. 九月 2009, 23:03:31
    alilsassy 
    Thanks Fencer, the tables working now......bad timing for deluis nice to see he still received the achievement even if he only won 50 chips.
    (22:39:54) Dealer calculates the winner(s).
    (22:39:55) deluis wins the pot with four sevens. The kicker card is six.
    (22:39:55) deluis earns the achievement [Le Chiffre]!
    (22:39:55) deluis wins 50 chips (main pot).

    27. 九月 2009, 22:04:42
    alilsassy 
    Fencer: BrainKing No Limit Fast High Bets 5 Seats(21:19:52) Table has been frozen for several minutes & will not release us from the table. The other tables seem to be working fine, but not this table http://brainking.com/en/PlayOnlinePoker?g=35

    26. 九月 2009, 18:30:16
    Bwild 

    26. 九月 2009, 05:31:20
    dr_Brainsurfer 
    题目: Re:
    wildrose: w're here..... on the big table...

    30. 八月 2009, 06:26:08
    wildrose 
    Hello where is everyone

    29. 八月 2009, 06:06:56
    wildrose 
    anyone care to try some no limit? table for 6

    17. 八月 2009, 02:34:40
    Bwild 
    anyone care to try some no limit? table for 6

    16. 八月 2009, 02:06:09
    Bwild 
    well...guess the system doesnt want any players.
    keeps disconnecting me.

    16. 八月 2009, 01:57:04
    Bwild 
    no limit...table for 6??

    15. 八月 2009, 23:31:23
    nema 
    题目: playing poker
    Hello,
    thanks a lot for this game.

    I don't know why but I only played one time because There are no players in the tabels and I tryed several days and several hours.

    12. 八月 2009, 17:37:22
    Hrqls 
    题目: Re: how many
    Fencer: thanks in advance :)

    12. 八月 2009, 16:16:14
    Fencer 
    题目: Re: how many
    Hrqls: After the site is rewritten.

    12. 八月 2009, 15:11:09
    Hrqls 
    题目: Re: how many
    Fencer: from which 7 were won with a royal flush

    which means i have to play about 19000 more games to get one :)

    will there any statistics available about poker on this site ?

    12. 八月 2009, 14:59:04
    Fencer 
    题目: Re: how many
    Hrqls: 132416 and counting.

    12. 八月 2009, 13:26:10
    Hrqls 
    题目: how many
    how many games of poker have been played until now ?

    12. 八月 2009, 12:18:13
    Hrqls 
    题目: Re: a few questions
    puupia: thanks :) .. 15 minutes and i can play again .. lets find out if this knowledge improves my play :)

    12. 八月 2009, 12:14:52
    puupia 
    题目: Re: a few questions
    Hrqls: Yes, you are correct. First is the lowest possible straight, second the highest straight. The third is not a straight at all, you cannot loop around like that.

    12. 八月 2009, 12:10:12
    Hrqls 
    题目: Re: a few questions
    puupia: thanks! very clear answers :)

    about the straight :
    A-2-3-4-5 is a straight ?
    10-J-Q-K-A is a straight ?
    Q-K-A-2-3 is a straight ?

    i think the first 2 examples are .. the third is nothing ?

    12. 八月 2009, 12:05:13
    puupia 
    题目: Re: a few questions
    puupia修改(12. 八月 2009, 12:09:26)
    Hrqls: Yes A2345 is a straight.

    You always use the best five card hand from each player to determine the winner. Whatever cards are left over do not matter at all. So in your example both players have the same straight and the pot will be split between them.

    Minimum amount to play in BK poker is the size of big blind. (Unless it has been fixed recently. You really should be able to play until you lose all your money.)

    And about the side pots: you cannot win anymore from any player than you put in the pot yourself. For example P1 calls 10, P2 raises all-in 50, p3 raises to 100, p4 calls and then P1 folds. Main pot will be 10+50+50+50=160. Whoever has the best hand in the end will win this. P3&P4 will also be playing for a side pot of 50+50=100.

    12. 八月 2009, 10:52:34
    Hrqls 
    题目: a few questions
    a few questions :

    can the ace be used as a '1' ?
    i mean : is A-2-3-4-5 considered to be a straight ? (or nothing)

    are there situations where more than 5 cards are used to determine the winner ?
    for example :
    player A has in his hand 2 and 10
    player B has in his hand K and 10
    on the table is 6,7,8,9,Q
    will the pot be split (both players have a straight) or will player B win with his (6th card) K ?

    whats the minimum amount you need to play in a game ? as much as the big blind ? or more ?
    (i am not talking about how much you need to join the table, but amout the amount you need to participate in a game when you are already on the table)

    12. 八月 2009, 07:35:54
    Hrqls 
    题目: Re: side pot
    coan.net: ah, thanks!

    that sounds logical and fair

    so if i save 50 credits for the last game and go all in on the first round .. then i can only win <nr of players> * 50 ? the rest of the pot will go the second best hand (provided they had enough credits to play normally :))

    11. 八月 2009, 16:20:49
    coan.net 
    题目: Re: side pot
    Hrqls: If one person put in all their money (lets say 100), and then 2 others bid higher (lets say up to 150) - then if that first person wins, they will only win up to what they put in (100x3 = win 300) - which will leave 100 left in the side pot, in which those 2 who bid higher play for that, and the one who has the higher hand between those 2 win that one.

    11. 八月 2009, 15:21:24
    Hrqls 
    题目: side pot
    i am sure this was already asked before, but i cant find it right now

    yesterday i played poker for the first time on here and i like it .. quite addicting :)

    sometimes i see 2 winners : 1 wins the pot and another wins the 'side pot' ?

    when does this happen ?

    9. 七月 2009, 00:57:16
    dr_Brainsurfer 
    the programming from the card´s is good... equal....
    in the playing window i miss a few things like a possibillity for a flag with the funktion fold, for faster playing...

    26. 六月 2009, 15:20:55
    Czuch 
    题目: Re:
    joshi tm: You are correct, you never do know exactly what your opponent has in their hand.

    It could be a well timed bluff, and every so often, you will rightly fold to a worse hand than your own.

    But again, over time, a first position raise (on a full table especially) is NOT going to be a pure bluff.

    ...also, good poker players have learned to always mix up their play style or strategy, so good instincts and the ability to read tells becomes very important as well (some people prefer online play just because tells dont become a factor)

    26. 六月 2009, 10:21:05
    toedder 
    题目: Re:
    Universal Eyes: No, he's in the BB in his example, everything is correct

    /nit

    26. 六月 2009, 07:00:37
    Universal Eyes 
    题目: Re:
    bobwhoosta: The 50/100 table here has 10 people even if it wasn't full 150 to start would mean 3 people playing for the pot and a 500 raise takes it to 650 plus yours brings it to 1150 not 1050.

    26. 六月 2009, 06:21:18
    joshi tm 
    题目: Re:
    bobwhoosta: But how do you know that your opponent has QQ assuming he is not that stupid to tell you?

    25. 六月 2009, 20:47:30
    Czuch 
    题目: Re:
    Pedro Martínez:

    25. 六月 2009, 20:35:28
    Pedro Martínez 
    题目: Re:
    Czuch: Zak? I've never seen him playing Poker.

    25. 六月 2009, 19:01:58
    Czuch 
    题目: Re:
    samanta: ok, I vote zak the second best player on brainking!

    25. 六月 2009, 18:11:45
    Bwild 
    题目: Re:
    Pedro Martínez:

    25. 六月 2009, 18:10:22
    Bwild 
    I think some people like to play cards?
    you can place all the odds you want...granted, in the long run, playing "proper" poker will win you chips, but if lady luck is riding on your opponents shoulder....your sunk, before the long run ever occurs.
    Because so many will stay trying to catch an inside straight, or just catch anything, it changes how you need to form your betting tactics.
    the main thing is, its virtual chips meant for fun....so have fun!!
    now....when Fencer finally incorporates tournament play...

    25. 六月 2009, 17:20:52
    bobwhoosta 
    Here's a situation where this applies, but in a different way...

    You have A J, both diamonds. Your opponent has Q Q. The pot is 150 to start (50/ 100 blinds), your opponent is in First Position pre-flop, and raises to 500. Since it is a full table, and the raise is from first position, when it comes around to you in the big blind (everyone folds, including the small blinds), you just call. The pot is now 1050

    The flop comes Q 5 2, two diamonds. You check, and your opponent bets 300. Do you call?

    The answer is yes. The odds against catching your flush are around 4 to 1 ( a little more), but your opponent is now offering you the shot at a pot of 1350 for 300, which is MORE than 4 to 1 pot odds. Now, sometimes the opponent will catch four of a kind, or a full house, but mostly when you catch your flush you will take the pot, and will win at least one more bet. So, it is an easy call.

    This brings in the concept of hand protection. If you have top pair after the flop, and there are three players in the hand, it is likely you have the best hand, but if you check, people will draw out on you. Three hands drawing is two hands too many!!! So, you must bet a significant percentage of the pot (more than 3/4 of the current pot) in order to drive out the other players. In this case, perhaps an overbet of the pot is warranted, for instanct, if the pot is 1000, bet 1200-1400!! The idea is to deny the odds to the players involved.

    You want to have a caller, but if you can take the hand down now, you've won a pot you could've lost later. Good players take advantage of that.

    And if all three players call you, and one catches a straight, and the other one a flush??? Well, that's poker. You did your job, denying the proper odds, and they caught some luck. Cest la vie.

    On a side note, the bigger the advantage, and less volatile the board, the less you can bet. For instance, a pot of 1200, and you have QQ, flop comes Q 7 2, with all three suits different. Check, or bet a small amount. You absolutely WANT callers here, because THEY DON"T HAVE THE ODDS ANYWAY.

    Hope this helps,

    -Zak

    25. 六月 2009, 17:10:06
    bobwhoosta 
    题目: Re:
    Czuch:

    I think Universal Eyes and Czuch, you are missing the point of Nothingnesses post. Now, it's likely that by using "Never" he is being too strict, but the point is this: If you always play against the odds, SOMETIMES you will win. MOST OF THE TIME, you will lose.

    So, breaking down his hand analysis into a hypothetical situation, let's say you're in a hand, and you're opponent has a pair of Aces. You have a shot at a backdoor flush. (Two Diamonds must come in a row to make a flush). He goes all-in. Do you call??

    Now, 1 in about 16 times, you will make your flush. Some of the other times, you will catch two pair. But MOST OF THE TIME, you will lose. That makes this a losing play, and in the long run, making such calls will lose you money.

    I made the situation more drastic to illustrate the point (I think) Nothingness was making. If you always play against the odds, you will lose money. If you always play the odds, you will win money.

    The tough part comes in not knowing exactly what the odds are!!!!! Some nice guesswork tends to help out nicely, but there I cannot help you...

    -Zak

    << <   3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12   > >>
    日期和时间
    在线的朋友
    最喜欢的讨论板
    朋友群
    每日提示
    Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有
    回顶端