用户名: 密码:
新用户注册
监管者: Vikings 
 Politics

Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.


All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..

As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.

Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!


*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."


每页的消息:
讨论板列表
您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑兵级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。
状态: 所有人能发表
帖子搜索:  

11. 二月 2014, 04:25:16
MissDelish 
题目: Re:
Papa Zoom: hahahaha....long time no see my friend :)

11. 二月 2014, 04:16:42
MissDelish 
I thought so...it is 18months since I have been in here;;;sorry crosseyed to use your name to check LOL....Pappa Zoom...a newbie in here? seems to be the same people...where is AD?

11. 二月 2014, 04:14:52
MissDelish 
题目: Re:
crosseyed: ,

5. 十月 2012, 03:37:37
MissDelish 
now this is what I like to see.A Man that speak his mind and also tells the truth.

21. 九月 2012, 02:12:52
MissDelish 
题目: Re:
Iamon lyme: ah so :) thanks, under-con-stumble now.

21. 九月 2012, 00:04:49
MissDelish 
I have looked everywhere. What is Pharicidic?

11. 九月 2012, 06:45:18
MissDelish 
hahaha thank you both of you.

11. 九月 2012, 05:01:30
MissDelish 
too many posts to read, did I miss anything?

11. 九月 2012, 05:01:01
MissDelish 
题目: Re:
Iamon lyme: you are dead right here LamonLyme:) Those that don't/won't work think it is their god given right to be given free handouts from the government. Most of them have never worked a day in there lives and always have their hands out for freebies.

3. 九月 2012, 22:58:35
MissDelish 
题目: Re: Ezechiel saw the wheel
Bwild: it is hard to inject oneself into a conversation on here isn't it? Ive tried, but keep getting ignored, so I just read the crap others have written.

15. 八月 2012, 00:31:57
MissDelish 
hahaha you had better have another drink and start crying, can't see anything :(

11. 八月 2012, 04:02:38
MissDelish 
Us english have saved the aussies again. Hackers are dangerous:) and (V) you have been caught hahaha, naughty, naughty

11. 八月 2012, 04:01:06
MissDelish 
题目: Anonymous is a naughty boy hehehe

11. 八月 2012, 03:29:39
MissDelish 
题目: this is terrible :(

8. 八月 2012, 22:45:17
MissDelish 
题目: Re: Let's here it for those for whom money is the 'ALL'
(V): what a silly thing to say "or to just 'grab' more attention to themselves." I would have thought it was the other way round. The paid members drawing attention to themselves. You sure can see that in here.

8. 八月 2012, 22:42:54
MissDelish 
题目: Re: Let's here it for those for whom money is the 'ALL'
Iamon lyme: oh how clever :) I didn't see that "I am only me" well done :)

8. 八月 2012, 08:58:59
MissDelish 
题目: Re: Let's here it for those for whom money is the 'ALL'
Iamon lyme: oops,sorry LamonLyme. corrected spelling. It would be nice if we could go back and correct our mistakes on these boards :(

8. 八月 2012, 08:57:47
MissDelish 
@sigh@ wish I had enough money to put in that LemonLime. (V) is lucky to have enough to put in there.

5. 八月 2012, 23:40:46
MissDelish 
题目: Re: Note to everyone
but they are interesting really even if it is aload of rubbish.

5. 八月 2012, 23:39:44
MissDelish 
题目: Re: Note to everyone
Silvery Moon: they do bicker a lot and reading back - waaaay back others have been told off for doing the same thing. These two must be special.

31. 七月 2012, 03:41:35
MissDelish 

28. 七月 2012, 03:01:48
MissDelish 
I was dissapointed with the opening ceremony:( London is a bedlam at the moment hahahaha, I should have stayed home.

27. 七月 2012, 03:58:29
MissDelish 
题目: Re: drugs can be stimulating for a brief moment too
Artful Dodger: haha@one too many :)

24. 七月 2012, 09:45:02
MissDelish 
anybody coming to London for the Olympics? We have been asked to walk to work to save the transport system hahaha.

23. 七月 2012, 08:11:02
MissDelish 
题目: Re: Caught in the act
Iamon lyme: has something been deleted? conversation doesn't make sense:(

23. 七月 2012, 03:35:10
MissDelish 
题目: Re: Caught in the act
Iamon lyme: lovely pics etc

21. 七月 2012, 06:18:16
MissDelish 
题目: Re:
Iamon lyme: loving your pics....so funny

20. 七月 2012, 03:51:54
MissDelish 
题目: Re:
The Col: I didn't tell the teacher anything----?? I was sent a personal message from someone who I don't even know, to keep on subject and dont be personal.

I sent a message back to her/him asking what was wrong but didn't get an answer. ----no worries.

Artfull Dodger love your links :)

19. 七月 2012, 23:46:36
MissDelish 
I didn't think you could make personal remarks to each other in here. There are a lot of personal remarks that I can see.

And how can you keep on topic when there are so many topics going on at once?

Or have I just changed it again hohohoho

19. 七月 2012, 00:43:49
MissDelish 
题目: Re:
Iamon lyme: ah, the old latin LOL..."Let the buyer beware" - in other words - read the fine print.

16. 七月 2012, 00:31:55
MissDelish 
题目: Re:
The Col: my prerogative :) being a woman that is.

15. 七月 2012, 22:50:06
MissDelish 
MissDelish修改(16. 七月 2012, 02:44:57)
why am I the only one being picked up on "clever?" when both ArtfulDodger and LamonLyme both thought it was clever also.

15. 七月 2012, 08:55:07
MissDelish 
题目: Re: I didn't have to, but since you are so fond of ragging on and on against big business and greed and such, I thought I'd get in on the 'act' too.
Iamon lyme: that is so clever....

10. 七月 2012, 22:17:26
MissDelish 
题目: Re:well 5bil is a mere drop in the ocean in comparison to those numbers
Iamon lyme: thank you LamonLyme....a case of someone not reading the appropriate statements properly :)

10. 七月 2012, 08:51:12
MissDelish 
题目: Re:
Iamon lyme: well 5bil is a mere drop in the ocean in comparison to those numbers. Perhaps that (V) has it wrong.

9. 七月 2012, 06:22:52
MissDelish 
I always thought a NEWT was a kind of amphibious animal/fish

18. 十月 2009, 22:34:35
MissDelish 
题目: Re:Legalization of "softer" drugs has worked in other countries, but politically unacceptable in many places.
Czuch: Today's cannabis far stronger than in '70s, DEA says

Related
See telltale signs of homes gone to pot
Cuban pot rings: Cops call them 'organized crime at its best'
Topics
Drugs and Medicines
Orlando International Airport
Colleges and Universities
See more topics »
XNew York Times
Crimes
Columbia University
Drug Trafficking By Henry Pierson Curtis

Sentinel Staff Writer

October 18, 2009
E-mail Print Share Text Size

Grow-house raids in residential neighborhoods — happening regularly these days in Florida — often yield an illegal crop worth millions.

Super Pot.

Once a mildly inebriating plant, cannabis's potency has increased steadily since first studied by the University of Mississippi Marijuana Project in the 1970s.

Back then, the average marijuana sample contained less than 1 percent THC. That jumped to 3.2percent in 1992 and then to 8.8 percent by 2006, according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse.

But marijuana cultivated in Florida regularly tests twice as strong as the national average, the result of years of genetic tweaking by Miami-based Cuban drug rings.

Raised in grow houses as clean as high-school science labs, the pot seized so far this year has contained 20 percent THC on average, according to the federal Drug Enforcement Administration in Miami.

"I don't know what they're teaching them in Cuba, but they know what they're doing," Polk County sheriff's Lt. Steven Ward said. "This is the best marijuana I've ever seen."

Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the chemical known as THC, is what gives marijuana its high. Plants seized elsewhere in the United States contain 10 percent on average, according to the DEA.


27% THC stuns MBI
When high-tech grow houses spread from Miami to Georgia from 2005 to 2007, drug agents say, marijuana samples began breaking old standards for potency.

"Twenty-seven percent!" said Agent Billy Powell of the Metropolitan Bureau of Investigation in Orlando, who seized 366 pounds of that strength pot from a grower near Orlando International Airport in 2007. "That's the highest I've ever heard of."

Pedro Tomas, the Cuban-born defendant in that case, told officers he learned how to grow marijuana by reading magazines at a local 7-Eleven store. Saying he didn't think raising pot for personal use was illegal, Tomas claimed he intended to smoke all 366 pounds himself.

"He said that with kind of a smirk on his face," Powell said.

In September, Tomas, 37, was sentenced in Orange County Court to 28 months in state prison.

Mahmoud ElSohly, a pharmacist in charge of the Marijuana Project, told The New York Times last year that illegal-pot growers have been using the same techniques to grow stronger cannabis that agronomists deploy to produce better-quality fruits, vegetables and other plants.

The Marijuana Project, a University of Mississippi research facility, is the only federally approved cannabis plantation in the U.S. Its laboratory tracks pot's chemistry and grows plants for researchers.

"They have been doing genetic selection for years," ElSohly said in December. "You can see the potency keeps going up."


Strong pot riskier?
What that means is debated endlessly.

Law enforcement and drug-treatment experts say significantly stronger pot poses known as well as suspected health dangers.

"The first thing to keep focused on is that marijuana at any potency is not a benign drug," said David Rosenbloom, president of the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University, who compared marijuana consumption to alcohol abuse. "I'm not talking about a kid who smoked one joint and went on with his life."

Marijuana's negative side effects include anxiety, hallucinations, panic reactions and physical impairment, such as with driving a car, which likely increases at higher THC levels, he said.

"I'm saying it's probable because of there hasn't been a lot of formal research," Rosenbloom said. "There's no reason to believe there will be any difference in outcome other than intensification."

Advocates for legalizing marijuana say stronger pot reflects market demand and simply means smokers can consume less to get its euphoric kick.

"The bottom line is there's more of a connoisseur market now than in the 1970s," said Keith Stroup, founder and legal counsel of NORML, the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws.

Henry Pierson Curtis can be reached at 407-420-5257 or hcurtis@orlandosentinel.com.
Copyright © 2009, Orlando Sentinel

日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有
回顶端