 |
|
 BrainKing.comBoard for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future. If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider). World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com 您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑兵级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。 状态: 所有人能发表
<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 > >> 30. 八月 2005, 22:31:07 题目: Re: Membership Levels playBunny: Scarlet Rose, mabe you she read all the entires properly so u will understand what is going on here before u accuse people of "skimping" I was not skimping at all, so get your facts right please. 30. 八月 2005, 22:18:32 题目: Re: Membership Levels ScarletRose: Excuse me its not a case of skimping. 30. 八月 2005, 22:16:13 题目: Re: Membership Levels Purple: But u shouldnt have to do that, i should have got the brains, end of story. But thanks anyway , you r one of a few nice people on here that support one other  30. 八月 2005, 20:57:30 题目: Re: Membership Levels Fencer: Yes but i didnt know that they were going to subscribe to a ROOK did i, so, i shouldnt be penalised for that, and no its not obvious why u dont go into details.  30. 八月 2005, 20:51:15 题目: Re: Membership Levels Fencer: But i am not making it complicated i think i have a very FAIR argument, but u can not seem to be able or to want to be able to justify it 30. 八月 2005, 20:44:37 题目: Re: Membership Levels BIG BAD WOLF: This all stems from my previous argument of allowing my referral to give their brains to somebody who is already a ROOK and not to me being the referrer. Can you or Fencer justify that, no you cant 30. 八月 2005, 20:18:11 题目: Re: lukulus: Oh ok, i apologise.
Thank you for your support though  30. 八月 2005, 20:15:55 题目: Re: Membership Levels Walter Montego: Thank you Walter, fancy a game of backgammon  30. 八月 2005, 19:53:51 题目: Re: Membership Levels playBunny: LMFAO , HERE!! HERE!!  30. 八月 2005, 19:51:01 Thats strange, where has that last persons message gone, the one that was agreeing with me.........was it just DELETED by someone???? 30. 八月 2005, 19:49:51 题目: Re: Is this really right??????? Fencer: Just but i still lose 100 brains regardless of whether you are changing your referral programme or not, im not going to get those 100 brains am i? 30. 八月 2005, 19:41:38 题目: Re: Is this really right??????? Fencer: Yes, but that doesnt sort the current brain referral problem out does it  30. 八月 2005, 19:33:36 题目: Re: Is this really right??????? Fencer: Im sorry Fencer but i still think it is wrong. Somebody has been awarded 100 brains without doing anything. I have quite a few people on my friends list who are looking to become paying members,, but if they go for Rook i wont get anything, nothing tiddly poop, but YOU get your money, so i am not asking for much am i???? 30. 八月 2005, 19:23:03 题目: Is this really right??????? Referrign to recent comment about the brain referral programme. Is it really right, that a person who didnt make a referral is allowed to receive the BRAINS that i wasnt allowed to have?????????????????? 30. 八月 2005, 12:01:06 题目: THANK YOU !! I would just like to say thank you to Wellywales for his kind words. He did not have to write or should i say type them, he did because he feels just as strongly about the naff brainking referral programme as i , and many others do. I really think it should be reviewed. 30. 八月 2005, 11:59:23 题目: Re: Andre Faria: WellyWales and to remind Fencer to add the brains to my account, they werent automatically added. 30. 八月 2005, 07:28:35 题目: Re: Grim Reaper: I think i should be rewarded at least something , or am i being selfish LOL 29. 八月 2005, 23:21:03 I think its totally unfair, that i was able to refer somebody to by membership, which they did, but i dont get any brains for it  << < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 > >> |
日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有 回顶端 |