 |
|
 BrainKing.comBoard for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future. If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider). World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com 您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑兵级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。 状态: 所有人能发表
<< < 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 > >> 9. 四月 2010, 14:24:21 题目: Re: 10 games match question Pedro Martínez: Interesting. How would a game of Battleboats, for example, end in a draw? There is no situation where a draw can arise in this game. One could use the "Offer a draw" link, but pointless in this game as there is always a winner! 9. 四月 2010, 11:06:35 题目: Re:  joshi tm: In case of DNS issues, please try 81.91.83.6 instead of BrainKing.com and you should be fine. And I am not aware of selling brainking.com domain.  Not for less than 1 million Euro.  9. 四月 2010, 10:58:39 题目: Re: 10 games match question  AbigailII: All games on BK can end in a draw. 9. 四月 2010, 10:43:56 题目: Re: Fencer: Strange. It seems I am having DNS-issues since yesterday I think. Sometimes it's no problem at all, sometimes I get a blank page showing that the domain name brainking.com is for sale :) 9. 四月 2010, 10:38:53 题目: Re: 10 games match question Herlock Sholmes: Sometimes people just play for the sake of playing. If you don't like the concept of "X game" matches, don't participate in them! There are enough alternatives that come close enough to what you want. 9. 四月 2010, 10:35:01 题目: Re: 10 games match question Universal Eyes: Odd game matches can result in draws as well for most games. Odd game matches only guarantees a winner if a single game cannot end in a draw. Most games on BK can end in a draw. 9. 四月 2010, 09:55:13 题目: Re: joshi tm: no problems here (also in the netherlands, like you) 9. 四月 2010, 05:58:18 题目: Re: 10 games match question Vikings: Even game matches can all result in a draw where the odd game matches there is only one winner,either way we all have the choice to choose. 9. 四月 2010, 04:10:49 题目: Re: 10 games match question Herlock Sholmes: "2 out of 3" would be simply a "2 win match", 4 out of 7 would be "4 win match" they are the same just not called the same as to what you are accustomed to. As far as the 10 game match, it shouldn't be confusing, it is simply a "10 GAME match", you either win by wining more than 5 games, lose by losing more than 5 games or tie by winning 5 games, if it were the way you suggested it would have to be called a "most points in x games match" 9. 四月 2010, 02:15:31 题目: Re: 10 games match question 被Herlock Sholmes修改(9. 四月 2010, 02:31:20) AbigailII: thanks Abigaill ... I think this current system is a little bit confusing ... lets say 10 games match would make sense if players would earn different scores in every game ... 10 game match would make sense if we added points for each game of Dice Poker for each player ...for example, 190 points for player A and 217 for player B in the first game, 202 for player A and 224 for the second player in the second game, and so on, till the last, 10th game (each time totaling these scores) ... otherwise it doesn't make sense to me ... we should introduce the system 2 out of 3, 3 out of 5, 4 out of 7 and so on ... 9. 四月 2010, 00:21:12 题目: Re: 10 games match question Herlock Sholmes: No, a 10 games match lasts 10 games. If you want a match where the first player to reach 6 points wins, you should play a 6 points match (aka 'best of 11'). 8. 四月 2010, 23:58:52 题目: Re: 10 games match question Herlock Sholmes: You really have to ask that question of fencer, some people just want to play a lot of games. LOL 8. 四月 2010, 23:49:43 题目: Re: check also this game  This may be more of a topic for one of the chess boards, but for any dice chess games, I will ONLY try to take 1 of any of the 2 "matching" pieces (with the exception if it is in danger of taking my king) Since if all you have left is a pawn & king, well then you have a 50/50 chance of moving the king each time (so attack with king) - If your opponent has 6 different pieces left, then they have a lot less of a chance of moving the pieces they want. So yea, if I have a chance to take someones last rook, but that rook is not putting my king in danger - I will not take it to help my odds more. 8. 四月 2010, 23:24:51 题目: Re: 10 games match question skipinnz: what would be the purpose of playing all 10 games when someone won 6 of them in a row ? this match already belongs to him/her ? 8. 四月 2010, 23:21:30 题目: Re: 10 games match question Herlock Sholmes:Sorry, in that case ten games have to be played, the best of isn't an option. 8. 四月 2010, 23:18:45 题目: Re: 10 games match question skipinnz: I think you are talking about 10 wins option(the first one) ... I am asking about the third option, the number of games played, not number of wins ... 8. 四月 2010, 23:13:03 题目: Re: 10 games match question Herlock Sholmes:I believe the match is set for ten games so the winner is the first to win ten games, not the best of ten. 8. 四月 2010, 23:02:30 题目: 10 games match question is it enough to win 6 games in this match or we have to play the whole number (10) games anyway ? 6. 四月 2010, 18:42:50 题目: check also this game strange chase begins at move no. 68 and after 13 moves I loose the game having huge material advantage ... single king made it ... and honestly I was sur this game is mine ... after a while I realized in panick, that I may loose ... 6. 四月 2010, 18:28:11 题目: Re: Beauty of Dice Chess 10x10 6. 四月 2010, 18:02:24 题目: Re: Beauty of Dice Chess 10x10 6. 四月 2010, 17:58:07 题目: Beauty of Dice Chess 10x10 I play this game with passion ... the more I play it, the more I am excited ... it's the only game I know in which by losing pieces you actually increase your power ... to the point that a single king alone can be the most dangerous weapon for all your heavy pieces and your kings still on the board ... why is it so ? well, statistics is the answer ... when you have only one king you can be sure yuor next move can only be done by your king ... it creates very uneasy situation for your opponent ... even having a queen, two rooks, knight and pawns your victory is not certain ... this single king will try to come close to your pieces and if luck won't be on your site, you will loose these pieces ... it's the only game I know you can enter the mouth of a lion and still get out of it as a winner ... it's the only game your pawns can bypass heavy pieces with grace and get promoted ... it's the game of luck and intricate tactics (more than it looks at first) ... a game of fun after all ... thanks to the inventor for creating this game for us. Andy. 3. 四月 2010, 01:32:28 题目: Re:  rod03801 and Gouwe gozer: thank you both and Happy Easter  3. 四月 2010, 00:51:43 题目: Re:  Bernice: open the message and you can put it back in your inbox  3. 四月 2010, 00:50:51 题目: Re:  Bernice: Click on the message. In the upper right corner, you will see a "restore" button. 3. 四月 2010, 00:36:42 2. 四月 2010, 10:05:47 题目: Re: Red Code GBear58: The color codes don't mean that you get any discount. The price is still the same but after you pay, you will be given some free months as a bonus, up to 125% of the membership you paid for. 2. 四月 2010, 08:38:09 题目: Re: Red Code 2. 四月 2010, 08:14:24 题目: Re: Red Code GBear58: I would imagine it would be the same as any other time except it would be double black rook and you could give one away....but thats only a guess 2. 四月 2010, 08:01:57 题目: Re: Red Code Does anyone know what a black rook would cost with a red code? 2. 四月 2010, 00:21:26 题目: Re: Red code question Artful Dodger: If, by any chance, you run across my Cardinal, I'd advise to keep a Black rook in reserve. One lifetime won't be enough 1. 四月 2010, 23:22:09 题目: Re: Red code question Artful Dodger: Let's say it should work as you say.  1. 四月 2010, 23:18:24 题目: Red code question  If a person were to buy a Black Rook membership under the Red Code, would that give that person two black rook memberships (as in one to give away or whatever?) 31. 三月 2010, 20:34:31 题目: Re: Fencer: I think he wants to know whether such a player will still have 0 vacation days left when the new system is implemented. 31. 三月 2010, 19:11:44 题目: Re: coan.net: Sorry, I am a little tired today so I probably don't understand. What exactly do you want to transfer if there are no days left? 31. 三月 2010, 18:34:02 题目: Re: 31. 三月 2010, 16:41:29 题目: Re: Fencer: That would be great - but a suggestion - if someone currently has 0 vacation days left, can that be transferred over with the new vacation day system? 31. 三月 2010, 15:39:05 题目: Re: Fencer: You want to tell us how the new vacation system is going to look like? Perhaps we'd even give some useful feedback to incorporate in the changes before it's live. 31. 三月 2010, 10:07:41 题目: Re: Hrqls: I think that I won't wait for BrainKing 3.0 to be completed and release a new (simpler) vacation system much sooner (in a week?). That would solve all problems like this once and forever. 31. 三月 2010, 09:40:43 题目: Re: Bernice: when vacation days are set they are substracted from the total of vacation days at once .. even when the vacation day itself still has to come for example : suppose i have 10 vacation days left and i use them all for the following 2 weeks .. then you would see a total of 0 vacation days left on my profile .. but i still wont timeout the following 2 weeks if i remember right you can see wether someone has set some vacation days in the future already .. i am not sure weither it shows it when 'today' is set as an vacation day though something else that could have happened is when someone changes his/her weekend days .. the old setting might have been used (because it was still valid then) while you see the new setting when you look at it later (and in the time between someone has changed the setting) 30. 三月 2010, 23:38:57 题目: Re: AbigailII: this person had NO days left 2 days ago. << < 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 > >> |
日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有 回顶端 |