用户名: 密码:
新用户注册
监管者: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


每页的消息:
讨论板列表
您未权限在该板张贴消息。只有最低脑马级别的会员才允许张贴在该板。
状态: 所有人能发表
帖子搜索:  

<< <   81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90   > >>
28. 四月 2012, 16:30:17
Herlock Sholmes 
题目: Re: Tripple Dies Poker 6D

happyjuggler0:


In order to get a bonus in Tripple Dice Poker, column in the Upper Sections should read:


63 ... 126 ... 189 and in Tripple Dice Poker 6D column should read: 84 ... 168 ... 252 , right ?


I guess it is a little bit cloudy for the players, especially beginners, and should be explained more clearly. 


Thanks for your reply


28. 四月 2012, 16:13:54
happyjuggler0 
题目: Re: Tripple Dies Poker 6D
Herlock Sholmes: If you look at the rules for triple dice poker, which your game is a variant of, you will see that the score that you need is based on the upper section of the first column. In order to get the bonus for the second column, you need to multiply by 2, and to get the bonus for the third column, you need to multiply by 3.

28. 四月 2012, 16:01:59
Herlock Sholmes 
题目: Tripple Dies Poker 6D

Could someone explain to me the rule of bonus in this variant ? I am not getting it. You are suppose not to reach 84 points to get the bonus (this is the way I understand word "limit")?


In my game I scored way beyond 84 points in the third column and didn't get anything ....


http://brainking.com/en/GameRules?tp=107&fwa=ShowGame!g=5686506


25. 四月 2012, 01:52:33
Bernice 
ANZAC day,,,,lest we forget

23. 四月 2012, 22:17:13
ketchuplover 
题目: Re: 9 of 193 players...
Bwild:

true that

23. 四月 2012, 19:04:31
Mort 
... Maybe a yearly top two match, with an award given to the winner

23. 四月 2012, 15:55:26
Bwild 
题目: Re: 9 of 193 players...
ketchuplover: dont get out much,do you? lol

23. 四月 2012, 15:34:45
ketchuplover 
题目: 9 of 193 players...
who first logged on from 1 April 2012 to 22 April 2012 have logged on today(so far)

23. 四月 2012, 04:12:48
Mélusine 
题目: Re:
Bwild: Yes, I succeed in doing it with friends but sometimes, I've enough to ask this.
And friends often say yes because they are kind with me, but they can be bad players and do not like the game.
We come back to what Purple said : people try to keep their rating the most higher possible, so a neutral program for training would be great.

23. 四月 2012, 04:06:02
Bwild 
题目: Re:
Mélusine: you can set games up to be unrated for practice.

23. 四月 2012, 04:02:43
Mélusine 
题目: Re:
Bwild: Yes, the variants are very .
I just regret that here, we don't have a programme for people who want discover a game or else practise.
I'm sure I would play more games, especially variants of checkers.

23. 四月 2012, 03:56:47
Bwild 
题目: Re:
Mélusine: I have to agree with you. I'm terrible at some games...but I like to play,and I learn from the more experienced players who are willing to give me the time.
chess and checkers is tough,due to the large number of program players..but the variants are great fun.

23. 四月 2012, 03:50:17
Mélusine 
题目: Re:
Purple: I agree, it's not fair from him to reject a game with you, but I think we must not impose an opponent on someone : he must be free to play with you or not.
Nobody is dupe ; we often see, here, people who aren't fair (example : people who send an invitation to someone else just for raising their BKR).
Me, I look at my rating, just to see the games where I have to progress, and just to have an idea, but I don't want to be prisoner of this rating, I don't forget that, 1st, I'm here for fun.

23. 四月 2012, 02:23:53
Purple 
题目: Re:
Aganju: TY. I don't like to beat up on a bunch of less skilled players just to get to him but I may have to do it.

23. 四月 2012, 02:17:58
Aganju 
题目: Re:
Purple: I checked, he is playing Checkers in many of the small tournaments. You could just enter yourself into one of those.

22. 四月 2012, 23:55:14
Purple 
题目: Re: invite higher rated players
happyjuggler0: Not that "It's Your Turn" is any role model but their ladders work beautifully. This is a better site but they have better ladders.

22. 四月 2012, 23:04:30
happyjuggler0 
题目: Re: invite higher rated players
Folks, you need to be careful before putting this type of "stairs" thing into BK rules for non-stairs games; there are all kinds of potential nasty unintended consequences.

For example, this could inspire people to change their settings to not accept invitations.

Another downside is wanting to limit number of ongoing games (for non-rooks) in order to make space for a tournament you want to play in, but too many people want to invite you to games and you are forced to accept.

Similarly you might be trying to clear up your remaining games to go on a playing hiatus (a vacation or just to not get burned out on a particular game).

Another potential problem is being forced to play time controls you don't want to play, or match lengths you don't want to play, or single game invitations where your opponent has the side that has a huge advantage (e.g. battleboats plus).

Right now I have a few players on my blocked users list because they were abusive or obnoxious in some other way. I would hate to be forced to play them.

I'm sure there are other potential problems that others can think of. Anyway, I hope Fencer would be very careful before implementing any such "reform" to make sure it doesn't hurt more than it helps.

I have had similar problems with players who are number one ranked while I was number two ranked who refused to play me. It is frustrating. Fortunately for me though none of those rating differences were insurmountable the way the rating difference in checkers is....

22. 四月 2012, 23:03:19
Purple 
题目: Re: invite higher rated players
Thom27: Even a loss would not lose him enough points to drop out of first place..it would just be much closer.

22. 四月 2012, 22:41:59
Thom27 
题目: Re: invite higher rated players
Herlock Sholmes:
maybe this could work:
If an invitation is refused where both players have an established rating and the inviter has the lower rating and the rating difference is not all too big and the refuser has no good excuse (like being a pawn and playing the full number of games) and the players do not already play a game of this type or have played one short ago,
then the ratings of the players are updated as if the game was played and had ended in a draw.

22. 四月 2012, 22:17:18
Herlock Sholmes 
题目: Re:
Purple: I think Bobby Fisher and Alekhine played the same "game" with others. They were the greatest after all. But in this case, maybe there should be some kind of provision or rule that the first guy cannot refuse playing the second one ? What do you think ?

22. 四月 2012, 18:42:29
Purple 
题目: Re:
Purple修改(22. 四月 2012, 18:42:58)
Resher: For example I am #2 rated checkers BKR but can NEVER be #1 because the top guy will not play me..he only plays those he can beat and he can not beat me. So there is no way out.

22. 四月 2012, 18:05:53
Mélusine 
题目: Re:
Resher: Ah yes, I see. Thank you.

22. 四月 2012, 17:52:57
Resher 
题目: Re:
Mélusine:Yes, use the Statistics tab on the left-hand menu

22. 四月 2012, 17:43:55
Mélusine 
Mélusine修改(22. 四月 2012, 17:44:57)
Is there's a list with the average BKR of each player ?
I mean with all the players together, because I know we have our result on our profile.

22. 四月 2012, 17:13:46
Mélusine 
When the number of players increases, the number of winners goes down.
Of course, it's more difficult to win a tournament with a big number of players, and I think that this result has more value.

22. 四月 2012, 17:10:57
Mélusine 
题目: Re: Top 8 list for tournament wins
happyjuggler0, Resher: Thank you to you both.

22. 四月 2012, 17:10:39
happyjuggler0 
题目: Re: Top 8 list for tournament wins
Resher: Doh! I looked at that list too, but I thought the first column meant something else.

I guess my list is a list of winners of public tournaments, while yours is a list of winners of any tournament.

22. 四月 2012, 17:07:36
Resher 
题目: Re: Top 8 list for tournament wins
Mélusine: Found it!

http://brainking.com/en/TournamentWinners?tp=0&mipl=4&submit=Show

This is from the "Winners" tab, then change minimum number of players to 4.

22. 四月 2012, 17:05:44
happyjuggler0 
题目: Re: Top 8 list for tournament wins
Mélusine: Unfortunately I had to construct it manually; I don't think there is an accessible list at BK.

I started here, which is a list of those who won 1000 or more tournaments. Then I looked up each name and ranked them myself.

http://brainking.com/en/Achievements?aid=64&submit=Submit&p=1

22. 四月 2012, 17:00:22
Mélusine 
题目: Re: Top 8 list for tournament wins
happyjuggler0: Where is this list ? I'd like to see my rating.

22. 四月 2012, 16:56:43
happyjuggler0 
题目: Top 8 list for tournament wins


aaru: 3875
Gammonator: 3049
Borowitz: 2710
FrancescoLR: 2380
cd power: 1793
AlterMann: 1413
Pioneer54: 1194
DeaD man WalkiN: 1188


22. 四月 2012, 16:42:47
Mélusine 
题目: Re: Can anyone beat this ?
Resher:

22. 四月 2012, 16:39:30
Resher 
题目: Re: Yippie! 100 won tournaments!
Gabriel Almeida: Aaru's on 3875 tournament wins! 

Can anyone beat this?

22. 四月 2012, 16:39:03
Mélusine 
题目: Re: Yippie! 100 won tournaments!
Gabriel Almeida: All 3 (Tenuki, Martinez and you) are players very strong. I'm sure that the average of your BKR is higher than mine.

22. 四月 2012, 10:38:00
Gabriel Almeida 
题目: Re: Yippie! 100 won tournaments!
Mélusine: me too! But tenuki or Martinez have... Hummm... A few more than i have! 1 or 2 more... :)

21. 四月 2012, 23:02:48
Mélusine 
题目: Re: Yippie! 100 won tournaments!
Aganju: I've just a few more than you.

21. 四月 2012, 22:59:18
ketchuplover 
题目: Re: Yippie! 100 won tournaments!
Aganju:

high five

21. 四月 2012, 22:05:04
Aganju 
题目: Yippie! 100 won tournaments!
Yippie! 100 won tournaments!

21. 四月 2012, 13:00:52
Mrs Moon 
题目: Re: Brains?!?!
pedestrian and Hrqls: Thanks for your help.

18. 四月 2012, 20:01:42
ketchuplover 
题目: Re:
MissDelish:

welcome back kiddo

18. 四月 2012, 09:44:44
Hrqls 
题目: Re: Brains?!?!
JungleBurger: you can buy a paid membership with brains

18. 四月 2012, 08:45:43
pedestrian 
题目: Re: Brains?!?!
JungleBurger: You can use brains to play in prize tournaments that offer brains as a prize... I think that's pretty much it.

18. 四月 2012, 01:32:43
Mort 
题目: Re: human beings have an innate tendency to feel more sleepy when it's dark and to have trouble sleeping when there's too much light.
MissDelish: Am I your doc?

17. 四月 2012, 23:13:22
Bernice 
题目: Re: human beings have an innate tendency to feel more sleepy when it's dark and to have trouble sleeping when there's too much light.
Roberto Silva: I haven't played any games on here in over 12 months hahahaha....I am thinking of buying a membership :)

17. 四月 2012, 21:52:02
Roberto Silva 
题目: Re: human beings have an innate tendency to feel more sleepy when it's dark and to have trouble sleeping when there's too much light.
MissDelish: cos you're too addicted to online boarding games?

17. 四月 2012, 21:48:47
MissDelish 
题目: Re: human beings have an innate tendency to feel more sleepy when it's dark and to have trouble sleeping when there's too much light.
(V): really?? why can't I sleep and it is pitch dark??

17. 四月 2012, 21:47:03
MissDelish 
hello all ;P) have just returned after a long absence.

17. 四月 2012, 20:23:14
Mrs Moon 
题目: Brains?!?!
What do brains do for you on this site?.. What do you get out of it pls?

5. 四月 2012, 22:57:34
Mort 
题目: Re: human beings have an innate tendency to feel more sleepy when it's dark and to have trouble sleeping when there's too much light.
Roberto Silva: Light (mainly blue light ) stops melatonin production which is part of the system for regulating our sleep cycle.

5. 四月 2012, 19:48:28
Roberto Silva 
题目: Re: Daylight saving time
El Cid: Yes, there was a change in Mainland Portugal (not so in the islands) from GMT to CET around the time the Schengen Area was implemented, so as to keep the same time zone as most Schengen Area countries, resulting in the Mainland being 1 hour ahead of Madeira and 2 hours ahead of Azores. Though we didn't actually stop DST, we just didn't reverse DST in winter that year, making it the new standard time - the following years adopted DST normally, just one hour ahead.

They quickly moved it back as, since people were going to work in the dark, they were more tired in early morning and employers reported a decrease in productivity as a result. All the regulations in the world won't reform biology: human beings have an innate tendency to feel more sleepy when it's dark and to have trouble sleeping when there's too much light.

<< <   81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90   > >>
日期和时间
在线的朋友
最喜欢的讨论板
朋友群
每日提示
Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Filip Rachunek, 版权所有
回顶端