Потребителско име: Парола:
Регистрация на нов потребител
Отговорник: Vikings 
 Politics

Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.


All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..

As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.

Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!


*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."


Съобщения на страница:
Списък с дискусии
Тук не Ви е разрешено да публикувате съобщения. Изисква се ниво на членство най-малко Мозъчна Пешка.
Режим: Всеки може да публикува
Търси сред публикуваното:  

<< <   1 2 3 4 5 6   > >>
8. януари 2010, 05:27:41
Snoopy 
Относно: Re: Bill O'Reilly on the terrorists.
Artful Dodger: was going to ask you before if that was the wrong board for your post when i saw it on the tournament one

7. януари 2010, 23:49:02
Snoopy 
Относно: Re: Take a look at this V
Czuch: they got it all wrong and are very bias

2. януари 2010, 21:15:57
Snoopy 
Относно: if this march is allowed to go ahead
Променен от Snoopy (2. януари 2010, 21:35:58)
in this town there be uproar
why shouldnt the British people be allowed to stand on the street and welcome our fallen hero's home

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/wiltshire/8437658.stm

27. декември 2009, 22:19:48
Snoopy 
Относно: Re: political correctness
(V): phew you both left it late..lol

27. декември 2009, 21:50:10
Snoopy 
Относно: Re: Same as when someone sponser,s a
Mousetrap: having a bad day mousey are you

27. декември 2009, 18:53:42
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:
Starsky: and the more you pull ppl up on this board tells everyone exactly who this really is

27. декември 2009, 13:53:09
Snoopy 
Относно: Re: political correctness gone wrong
Променен от Snoopy (27. декември 2009, 14:10:26)
(V): i love to see a court case where someone tries and sues over bingo numbers
it be laughed out of court



http://www.apennyearned.co.uk/bingo-terms.html

27. декември 2009, 13:29:23
Snoopy 
Относно: Re: political correctness gone wrong
(V): im sick and tired of being told i cannot wish ppl a Happy Christmas anymore has it may offend
it will always be Christmas in my eyes
and wishing ppl a Happy Holiday dosnt mean the same in anyone eyes

27. декември 2009, 12:51:56
Snoopy 
Относно: political correctness gone wrong

26. декември 2009, 09:31:51
Snoopy 
Относно: Re: a little history lesson
Bwild: BRAVO!!!!

24. декември 2009, 22:08:40
Snoopy 
Относно: Re: That's because they are liars and crooks.
Artful Dodger: it happens in every walk of life somewhere down the road

24. декември 2009, 21:57:40
Snoopy 
Относно: Re: That's because they are liars and crooks.
(V): and theres so much corruption going on in the UK to which you fail to mention

24. декември 2009, 21:26:21
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:The Dems are crooks, liars, and swindlers. And man of the Repubs aren't far behind. They all need to be replaced!
(V): but you go on and on to the point where everyone else is fed up of listening to you

24. декември 2009, 21:20:16
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:The Dems are crooks, liars, and swindlers. And man of the Repubs aren't far behind. They all need to be replaced!
(V): yep thats true to point where you make the UK sound has if its paradise

24. декември 2009, 19:35:27
Snoopy 
Относно: Re: The 60-39 vote
Променен от Snoopy (24. декември 2009, 19:45:53)
Artful Dodger: that teach me not to believe everything i hear on the BBC..lol

24. декември 2009, 19:11:43
Snoopy 
Относно: Re: The 60-39 vote
Artful Dodger: am i right in thinking just before Bush went
the USA was very close to being bankrupt
if thats the case whats happened since that they suddenly can find this money

24. декември 2009, 19:03:30
Snoopy 
Относно: Re: The 60-39 vote
Artful Dodger: first item on our national news tonight
your health care bill

24. декември 2009, 17:39:40
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:The Dems are crooks, liars, and swindlers. And man of the Repubs aren't far behind. They all need to be replaced!
(V): but the point ppl are making to you yes we all love our countries but you go overboard
saying we dont have nasty things happening
in fact were no better or worse than any other country in the

24. декември 2009, 12:33:18
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:The Dems are crooks, liars, and swindlers. And man of the Repubs aren't far behind. They all need to be replaced!
(V): but the way you come across your the only one who does love there country

23. декември 2009, 19:17:50
Snoopy 
Относно: Re: nice to see some justice gaven out
Artful Dodger: from what i read and saw on the video it was all money driven
to hell with anyone else they wanted to be famous

23. декември 2009, 19:11:44
Snoopy 
Относно: nice to see some justice gaven out

23. декември 2009, 12:41:39
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:The Dems are crooks, liars, and swindlers. And man of the Repubs aren't far behind. They all need to be replaced!
Променен от Snoopy (23. декември 2009, 13:54:22)
Bernice: well apart from the fact that every time we get a inch of snow the country grinds to a halt
and makes us the laughing stock of the world

we have the second highest teenage pregancy in the world http://www.independent.co.uk/extras/big-question/the-big-question-why-are-teenage-pregnancy-rates-so-high-and-what-can-be-done-about-it-1623828.html
this is due mainly because they know has soon has they turn 16 the entitled to a coucil house, flat
which is furnished by the DSS
and so begins there life on benefits

we have a stupid goverment that tried to buy us out of recession

which now every woman man and child will be paying for
for the next 30 years

we had corrupt MPS milking a system and tax payers having to foot the bill

despite what V says we still have no go areas in some cities because of the fear of hoodies on a nighttime

should i go on..lol

22. декември 2009, 09:49:52
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:
(V): oh wow thats a first i knew something you didnt

ive known about it for long time has i used to do the old ppls bungalows where my mother lived when i visited

from what i remember being told the bins are suppose to be stocked at start of October until they removed at the end of March
my council is really good at things like this they refill them has soon has someone tells them they need doing

but of course has in rest of life you get the morons you use the salt for there own purpose ie there drives etc

22. декември 2009, 09:17:56
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:
(V): well of course you can do that i thought anyone who was anyone knew that simple fact
been like that since they first introduced them

21. декември 2009, 23:16:52
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:
(V): Jules can ya fix ya link please

21. декември 2009, 23:16:17
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:
Artful Dodger: but its the high flying lawyers who are really to blame and the silly jurors who back these claims

ive been reading so many in the last hour but this one i thought takes the biscuit..lol


What is illiteracy worth in Ohio? about 8 million!

In September 1988, two Akron, Ohio-based carpet layers named Gordon Falker and Gregory Roach were severely burned when a three and a half gallon container of carpet adhesive ignited when the hot water heater it was sitting next to kicked on. Both men felt the warning label on the back of the can was insufficient. Words like “flammable” and “keep away from heat” didn’t prepare them for the explosion. They filed suit against the adhesive manufacturers, Para-Chem. A jury obviously agreed since the men were awarded $8 million for their troubles.

21. декември 2009, 19:49:27
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:well on all the many searches ive done this afternoon ive come up with NOTHING
Starsky: your point on the current subject is

21. декември 2009, 19:47:28
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:
(V): i found this on the bbc

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3453039.stm


but its very very unclear on whom would be to blame

21. декември 2009, 19:38:14
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:
(V): And I'm not going through pages and pages and pAgEs of legal cases

well on all the many searches ive done this afternoon ive come up with NOTHING

21. декември 2009, 19:30:59
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:
Променен от Snoopy (21. декември 2009, 19:33:00)
(V): and i think your talking outta ya ass again when claiming it wont be hard to prove in a court of law over councils gritting pavements
they get round to it AFTER they get the roads moving again

show me one case where it happened cause ive heard of NONE

21. декември 2009, 19:29:12
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:
(V): there is a massive difference in pointing out there mistakes to them than seeking your day in court IMO

its all to easy to bend the rules for one falling on a pavement and claiming damages
i know at least 3 ppl who have had other accidents and then gone out and found a raised paving slab and got money from the council

21. декември 2009, 18:37:42
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:
GTCharlie: okay we can settle out of court if you take it a penny a week for rest of my life..lol

21. декември 2009, 18:23:14
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:
Artful Dodger: heres another stupid one for you luckily it was thrown out of court and the defendant picked up the bill
One idea would be to adopt the “loser pays” system used in the United Kingdom and most of Europe to deter frivolous lawsuits. For example, in England last fall, a patient, who sued his doctor for $350 claiming the doctor had given him a cold during an examination, was ordered to pay almost $1,500 in costs after his case was thrown out of court.

21. декември 2009, 18:00:21
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:
GTCharlie: i wish you luck on that one then

21. декември 2009, 17:35:59
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:
(V): And from what I remember of my law classes at college, if someone breaks a leg, etc on the paths then the council is liable and can be sued. I remember this as my tutor sued the council over lack of maintenance regarding a broken paving slab that resulted in her breaking her ankle... she won.


i think were talking about very different issues here
firstly falling on a pavement due to lack of maintenance
is alot easier to prove has all you need do is take a pic of offending pavement and a hospital report and most councils pay up because they dont want the aggro of going to court
but theres still a lot of ppl who will do nothing and put it down to bad luck

geesh you keep telling everyone how much better the UK is from the rest of the world
yet if im reading you right your planning to sue your local council for not gritting a pavement
IMO if ppl start doing that we be even more in line with Americans who sue for any little thing

i think you find it very hard to prove in a court of law

21. декември 2009, 16:39:52
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:
(V): this is from my local council and i would think that most others follow these guidelines over gritting pavements

http://www.stockton.gov.uk/help/cfyafaqs/gritfaqs/pedestrianroutes/

21. декември 2009, 16:25:28
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:
(V): but you confuse me yet again because i thought in your eyes the councils and police etc can do no wrong

21. декември 2009, 16:20:15
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:
(V): and i also remember a case where someone sued the householder because they had cleared the pavement outside there house and someone had slipped the next morning on the ice that formed overnight
so its a no winner has far has im concerned

councils do grit round the homes of the elderly least they do in the NE

21. декември 2009, 16:12:45
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:
(V): if the mod of the board thinks there is a good reason to remove the link im sure he will

21. декември 2009, 16:08:46
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:
(V): but has every council in the country is facing major cuts its goes without saying that having salt spread on footpaths is way down the list
surely its better spend on keeping the roads running free

i dont think clearing snow from footpaths is a good idea anyway unless said pavement is going to dry very quickly
which is very unlikely with this cold weather because next day it be a skating ring twice has bad

21. декември 2009, 16:03:38
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:
(V): you mean like this


http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/

21. декември 2009, 15:27:09
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:

21. декември 2009, 14:01:19
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:
(V): or on the other hand it can be snow with rocks in
or snow with ice in so its not cool to have snowballs thrown at you for nothing

14. декември 2009, 21:48:27
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:oops silly me
(V): thinking it was you who is replying to every post saying nothing new
same old same old that is dragging the subject on

14. декември 2009, 21:35:24
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:still the same Jules no new evidence so he changes the subject
(V): geesh that's old news we knew that in April/May
so has ive been saying for LAST 2 DAYS
we still have NO new evidence on the subject
all your ranting on about was disclosed to everyone in April/May

14. декември 2009, 19:00:15
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:still the same Jules no new evidence so he changes the subject
(V): did i ask for examples NOPE I DIDN'T

14. декември 2009, 18:49:11
Snoopy 
Относно: Re: still the same Jules no new evidence so he changes the subject
(V): and it better if you stuck to the subject in hand instead of trying to be clever all the time bringing things up to twist it to suit yourself

14. декември 2009, 18:47:11
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:: still the same Jules no new evidence so he changes the subject
Променен от Snoopy (14. декември 2009, 18:49:29)
(V): here we go again changing the subject to suit yourself
ITS POINTLESS trying to have a argument with you you either change the subject or you twist things round to suit yourself HAS PER NORMAL

14. декември 2009, 18:31:45
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:
(V): key words in that sentence UNDER SUSPICION
funny how 9 months down the line he hasnt been charged
and dont try and be clever everyone in the UK who gets a newspaper read the same flaming news DOH!!!

still isnt concrete evidence is it DOH!!!

14. декември 2009, 18:12:36
Snoopy 
Относно: Re:
(V): you didnt answer my question has per normal

<< <   1 2 3 4 5 6   > >>
Дата и час
Приятели на линия
Любими дискусии
Дружества
Подсказка на деня
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Филип Рачунек, всички права запазени
Нагоре