Käyttäjätunnus: Salasana:
Uuden käyttäjän rekisteröinti
Valvoja(t): rod03801 
 Chinese Chess

Xiangqi - Chinese Chess

Knights and Rooks may join the Xiangqi Fellowship which has additional boards for discussion and resources (links to other sites).
Pawns may not join the fellowships, but links from the Xiangqi resources board are have been copied to a Resources message.
Create a New game of Xiangqi,  Established ratings,   Provisional ratings,  The Rules of Xiangqi.
___________________________


Viestejä per sivu:
Lista keskustelualueista
Sinulla ei ole oikeutta kirjoittaa tälle alueelle. Tälle alueelle kirjoittamiseen vaadittu minimi jäsenyystaso on Brain-Sotilas.
Moodi: Kaikki voivat lähettää viestejä
Etsi viesteistä:  

6. Elokuu 2011, 17:55:21
Justaminute 
Otsikko: Re: re: what a game!
computeropponen:
I fail to see how much a post could be of interest to anyone but yourself but in posting it you contravened two of the rules of the user agreement you have agreed to by joining the site:

6.No “Copy'n'Pasting” other user's posts, words or Personal Messages (PM’s) onto any Public Discussion Boards without their permission. Failure to adhere to this may result in you being banned from the Discussion Board, or possibly, banned from posting on all Public Discussion Boards.

4.No Foul Language – It is unacceptable whatever the circumstances. Please be aware that Children may also have access to a Public Board. BrainKing is a Worldwide Site - please also consider that a “word” or “phrase” may not be classed as Foul Language from where you are from, but it may be elsewhere in the World. If in doubt – use an alternative word or phrase. Failure to adhere to this may result in you being banned from the Discussion Board, or possibly, banned from posting on all Public Discussion Boards. This also applies to the posting of links to YouTube videos.

29. Heinäkuu 2011, 16:00:56
Justaminute 
Otsikko: Re:
PaoloRus: That REALLY made me laugh. I hope it was meant as a micky take or you are as cracked as he is.

29. Kesäkuu 2011, 17:49:02
Justaminute 
Otsikko: Re: RE: HABITS
computeropponen:
Your endless posts are not constructive. Sometimes people complain their opponents don’t move fast enough, sometimes they complain others in a tournament don’t move fast enough but I have never seen anyone complain that a game they are not involved in at all is not going fast enough. The answer if you are involved is always the same, choose a time control you are happy with, don’t accept time limits that you don’t like. If you are not involved as has been said many times already it is nothing to do with you. To expect players to play at a speed that suits you as a spectator is arrogance, it is their game they can do what they want.

It has been pointed out repeatedly that sites do exist that specialise in Chinese chess and provide real time play. Brainking is not that and endless moaning about it won’t change it. Brainking provides a product that the members want, if you want something else, it exists, go elsewhere.

If you feel a need to post on this site regularly despite not playing any games have a look at Son of Monse’s posts on the Tablut board as an example of constructive on topic posts about a game a member is interested and informed about.

28. Maaliskuu 2011, 15:47:20
Justaminute 
Otsikko: Re: RESilent of this board
computeropponen:

Your figures support what FromHell said. Inactive means are no longer playing, possibly have not even logged onto the site for years. Why would an unrated player be interested in discussing a game he don’t play?

Look at the chess board more closely, there is very little general chat. There was a big debate a while back over a technical point on ice age chess but other than that very little general chat.

As currently number 14 on the established grades in Chinese Chess I have no illusions that my standard of play is poor (and before you ask I have no desire to improve) and I would suggest there are no more than 5-6 strong chinese chess players on the site. I currently have either established or provisional rankings in 37 games on the site, do you expect me to engage in discussions on all of them? If not why should I treat Chinese Chess differently?

If an interesting point came up, an interpretation of the rules for example, I would be interested but posts about how your games are getting on are of little interest to anyone but yourself.

If you seriously want a discussion about Chinese Chess I would suggest this is the wrong site, you need to find one that specialises in the game.

Päivämäärä ja aika
Ystävät palvelimella
Suosikki keskustelut
Yhteisöt
Päivän vinkki
Tekijänoikeudet - Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, kaikki oikeudet pidätetään.
Takaisin alkuun