Käyttäjätunnus: Salasana:
Uuden käyttäjän rekisteröinti
Valvoja(t): sarok 
 Reversi

Reversi (Othello) and variants.


Viestejä per sivu:
Lista keskustelualueista
Sinulla ei ole oikeutta kirjoittaa tälle alueelle. Tälle alueelle kirjoittamiseen vaadittu minimi jäsenyystaso on Brain-Sotilas.
Moodi: Kaikki voivat lähettää viestejä
Etsi viesteistä:  

3. Elokuu 2004, 05:51:37
Kevin 
Yes, I don't believe rounded ratings are stored - so the one that's listed as higher would likely be the higher one, even though they round to the same whole number.

27. Heinäkuu 2003, 06:17:10
Kevin 
Ah, i see. Although, does the software tell you about these areas? Otherwise, it still wouldn't be helping you.

26. Heinäkuu 2003, 20:45:17
Kevin 
Well do you consider it cheating to play games against a computer opponent (such as zebra) just for fun, and to improve your game? Because that is essentially what you are doing by analyzing previous positions. I don't think there's anything wrong with it.

26. Heinäkuu 2003, 06:33:17
Kevin 
I think if the position has already passed in the game, i think figuring out what move would have been better is fine, because they can't change their previous moves (if that's what you mean).

25. Maaliskuu 2003, 21:22:33
Kevin 
What is the game number?

28. Helmikuu 2003, 07:03:31
Kevin 
Otsikko: Re: Waiting to move.
That is how Fencer made it - even if you have no moves you have to go into it and submit it. There was two reasons he told me. First, if several passes are required in a row by one player, the board could come back to the completely different when it is their turn. Second, you still should be able to send a message with the move, even if it is a pass.

Päivämäärä ja aika
Ystävät palvelimella
Suosikki keskustelut
Yhteisöt
Päivän vinkki
Tekijänoikeudet - Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, kaikki oikeudet pidätetään.
Takaisin alkuun