 |
|
 World of ArtsPlease come in and share your passions.. whether it be drawing, sculpting, painting, working with clay or photography, just to name a few. Sinulla ei ole oikeutta kirjoittaa tälle alueelle. Tälle alueelle kirjoittamiseen vaadittu minimi jäsenyystaso on Brain-Sotilas. Moodi: Kaikki voivat lähettää viestejä
28. Helmikuu 2008, 14:10:30 Otsikko: Re: This board needs a boost ... ScarletRose: I'm not sure exactly what you mean ... but I think you liked it. ;) 27. Helmikuu 2008, 17:19:08 Otsikko: This board needs a boost ... ... what about my Flickr page? http://www.flickr.com/photos/24154690@N03/ let me know what you think. 19. Tammikuu 2006, 16:35:38 Otsikko: Re: ScarletRose: I've been missing the discussions on all the boards due to time constraints, sadly. 19. Tammikuu 2006, 16:20:20 Otsikko: Re: ScarletRose: just sticking to the shadows reducing my number of games . . . you know . . . real important stuff, lol. ;) 17. Tammikuu 2006, 19:50:29 Otsikko: Re: ScarletRose: Good decision! ;) 31. Lokakuu 2005, 22:44:18 Otsikko: Re: Art philosophy ScarletRose: you blinded me with . . . artistic license, LOL ;) 31. Lokakuu 2005, 19:17:04 Otsikko: Re: Art philosophy nobleheart: I think alot of people would say both. It is a case of "say what you think others will want to hear"
ScarletRose: tsk, tsk, scarlet. the system is just as visual as the nature and both nature and system can stimulate the mind. 30. Lokakuu 2005, 22:01:09 Otsikko: Art philosophy Is the beauty of a natural system in the nature or in the system? 26. Lokakuu 2005, 22:56:19 Otsikko: Re: nobleheart: I think you are confusing Christianity and Catholicism. (but that's a debate for a religion board) 25. Lokakuu 2005, 22:02:18 Otsikko: Re: Rayleigh Scattering ScarletRose: the real question is did we spell it right. (spelling is a difficult art to master, LOL) 25. Lokakuu 2005, 21:45:08 Otsikko: Re: ScarletRose: I believe the term is "Rayleigh Scattering". I took a college course in Geography so I should know the proper spelling, sadly when I passed the course I dumped most of the information into my mental recycle bin (you know what they say, "garbage in/garbage out", an inexact use of the term but I think it applies, LOL) 25. Lokakuu 2005, 16:03:06 Otsikko: Re: harley: thank you, I thought it might have such an origin but I wasn't sure. Speaking of the sun it too appears several times in classical paintings, perhaps the famous Renaissance painters got some of their inspiration from pagan beliefs? 25. Lokakuu 2005, 02:16:34 Otsikko: Re: some art nobleheart: the jesus image brings a question to mind. What is the origin of the halo? As far as I know there isn't any scriptural (Christian or otherwise) to support the image and I've heard that it was added to certain images as an emblem of holiness (to distinguish holy characters from other characters in art). 21. Lokakuu 2005, 19:16:57 Otsikko: Re: art philosophy . . . ScarletRose: as the artist molds the clay the clay molds the artist (personal growth through artistic expression). 21. Lokakuu 2005, 14:27:15 Otsikko: Re: art philosophy . . . ScarletRose: but the reverse is also true . . . don't you think? 20. Lokakuu 2005, 22:22:34 Otsikko: art philosophy . . . which is the potter and which is the clay? 13. Lokakuu 2005, 17:20:17 Otsikko: Re: Art interpretation ScarletRose: hehehe . . . I'm a romantic when it comes to my craft . . . 13. Lokakuu 2005, 17:12:05 Otsikko: Re: Art interpretation ScarletRose: not true lovers? perhaps you're correct on the majority. most chessplayers are very self-centered secular humanists with a touch of narcissism . . . I don't count myself in that number, I'm an artist . . . 12. Lokakuu 2005, 22:52:19 Otsikko: Re: Art interpretation DanDanDan: I know you didn't just compare chess to a pile of rubbish . . . art is defined by most scholars to be something that brings pleasure to the artist as well as can be appreciated by others . . . chess falls in this category . . . even people who don't play appreciate when one person beats another . . . 12. Lokakuu 2005, 19:15:24 Otsikko: Re: DanDanDan: show me an art form that is "art in its purest sense" . . . what is "pure"? (that's a relative question, so it is an 'eye of the beholder' thing). 11. Lokakuu 2005, 21:36:59 Otsikko: Re: ScarletRose: spoken like a true non-addict, Scarlet. ;) 11. Lokakuu 2005, 18:17:04 Otsikko: Re: ScarletRose: Is chess considered an art form? |
Päivämäärä ja aika
Ystävät palvelimella
Suosikki keskustelut
Yhteisöt
Päivän vinkki
|
|
Tekijänoikeudet - Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, kaikki oikeudet pidätetään. Takaisin alkuun |