Käyttäjätunnus: Salasana:
Uuden käyttäjän rekisteröinti
Valvoja(t): Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Viestejä per sivu:
Lista keskustelualueista
Sinulla ei ole oikeutta kirjoittaa tälle alueelle. Tälle alueelle kirjoittamiseen vaadittu minimi jäsenyystaso on Brain-Sotilas.
Moodi: Kaikki voivat lähettää viestejä
Etsi viesteistä:  

<< <   359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368   > >>
18. Tammikuu 2006, 21:27:10
plaintiger 
harley: of people putting a lot of games in the waiting room and then resigning halfway through them, You say, Why try to make sense of it?! It takes all kinds, I'm sure they had their reasons even if we can't understand them.

You're advocating complacency. You're saying, "the hell with etiquette, polite behavior, principles...people should be allowed to do anything they please, and no-one should ever complain about it, because the perpetrators must have their reasons."

that's a blanket excuse for any behavior at all. Hitler, Qadaffi, Jeffrey Dahmer...they all had their reasons. i'm not equating the behavior of game-bailers with the behavior of those three, but the principle is the same. if certain codes of behavior are simply ignored, a civilization, be it that of a country or of a gaming site, falls apart.

it's possible to go too far in one's efforts to avoid conflict, Lady, and i think that's what You're doing here.

18. Tammikuu 2006, 00:24:25
WhisperzQ 
Otsikko: Re: Three Checks Chess Rule Interpretation
wetware: And to complete the set there are:

6x6: http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=106
10x10: http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=96
Other Variants: http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=45
Chinese: http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=92
Japanese: http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=94

There are also some German speaking boards and maybe other languages too.

Cheers ... WQ:)

17. Tammikuu 2006, 20:45:17
wetware 
Otsikko: Re: Three Checks Chess Rule Interpretation
harley: Great recommendation. That 8x8 discussion board will suit me perfectly! Thank you.

16. Tammikuu 2006, 18:09:25
harley 
Otsikko: Re: Three Checks Chess Rule Interpretation
wetware: If you like three checks chess yu might find this chess variants 8x8 discussion board interesting;

http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=6

Or maybe the chess variants 10x8;

http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=34

16. Tammikuu 2006, 17:25:25
wetware 
Otsikko: Re: Three Checks Chess Rule Interpretation
Matarilevich: Thanks so much for the prompt reply! ww

16. Tammikuu 2006, 17:22:09
Kili 
Otsikko: Re: Three Checks Chess Rule Interpretation
wetware: The board fot this question is chess variants.
A double check counts as one check in the global sum of checks in a game of three checks chess

16. Tammikuu 2006, 17:16:31
wetware 
Otsikko: Three Checks Chess Rule Interpretation
Feel free to move this question to another area, if there's a more appropriate place. Does a double check count as one check or two, according to the BrainKing software? My guess (and preference) is "one", but I need to know in order to choose the proper continuation in a current game. Thanks in advance!

14. Tammikuu 2006, 16:40:04
ScarletRose 
doing good here as well

14. Tammikuu 2006, 16:22:46
baddessi 
everything seems fine on this side of the pond

14. Tammikuu 2006, 14:23:50
playBunny 
Otsikko: Re: Im having big probs
Stevie: Likewise. For me the problem is highly intermittent and most accesses are behaving. Then a big hesitation or several little one occur. UK problem, I guesss. [shrug]

14. Tammikuu 2006, 14:08:21
Stevie 
Otsikko: Re: Im having big probs
playBunny: what are you on? Im on 2.2Meg broadband dsl

14. Tammikuu 2006, 14:06:13
playBunny 
Otsikko: Re: Im having big probs
Stevie: Reeeeeeaalllly slow response times here as well.

14. Tammikuu 2006, 14:04:23
Stevie 
Otsikko: Im having big probs
with page loading speeds etc etc especially when using messages..

Is it just me?

13. Tammikuu 2006, 02:06:54
Bwild 
good people like baddessi make BrainKing a pleasure to visit.
Congrats young lady.

13. Tammikuu 2006, 01:01:57
baddessi 
Otsikko: Re:
alanback: thanks
now back on topic everyone!

13. Tammikuu 2006, 01:00:22
alanback 
Otsikko: Re:
baddessi: At the risk of being ruled off topic, let me say you are a welcome feature :-)

13. Tammikuu 2006, 00:58:30
baddessi 
Otsikko: Re:
harley: I always thought of myself more as a feature : )
Thanks Eriisa(the flake) and harley

13. Tammikuu 2006, 00:55:09
skipinnz 
Otsikko: Re:
alanback: S no W

12. Tammikuu 2006, 23:54:29
alanback 
Otsikko: Re:
Eriisa: So, are you trying to tell us your a flake?

12. Tammikuu 2006, 23:53:15
Eriisa 
Otsikko: Re:
alanback: lol

12. Tammikuu 2006, 23:51:20
harley 
Otsikko: Re:
Eriisa: I think he was joking, theres a winking face there!
I always knew baddy was a structure

12. Tammikuu 2006, 23:51:02
alanback 
Otsikko: Re:
Eriisa: Who pays attention to moderators anyway??? ;-)

12. Tammikuu 2006, 23:50:00
Eriisa 
LOL, I guess I just assumed everyone would see her name up there.

12. Tammikuu 2006, 23:49:48
alanback 
Otsikko: Re:
Eriisa: Absolutely. This is a board to discuss BrainKing, not to discuss this board

12. Tammikuu 2006, 23:43:31
furbster 
Otsikko: Re:
Muokannut furbster (12. Tammikuu 2006, 23:43:41)
Eriisa: Woulda perhaps been useful if you mentioned it with your message.

12. Tammikuu 2006, 23:41:57
Eriisa 
Otsikko: Re:
alanback: Congrats to the new moderator of the board is off topic????

since when? A moderator is a part of the structure and feature..........

12. Tammikuu 2006, 23:35:40
alanback 
Otsikko: Re:
Eriisa:

12. Tammikuu 2006, 23:32:13
Eriisa 
congrats Baddy!!!!


12. Tammikuu 2006, 20:31:47
Adaptable Ali 
Otsikko: Re: Zero points awarded in Sphere Froglet
prettymama:

12. Tammikuu 2006, 19:20:29
prettymama 
Otsikko: Re: Zero points awarded in Sphere Froglet
playBunny: Thank You

12. Tammikuu 2006, 19:18:20
playBunny 
Otsikko: Re: Zero points awarded in Sphere Froglet
prettymama: Lol. It does seem strange but it makes sense. It's due to the fact that Sphere froglet is so new.

Blackviper's ranked #2 in Sphere Froglet but that's because he's the second of only 2 players who have an established rating! Everyone else, including yourself, is provisionally rated and ranked. On that ranking you're at #41 whereas blackviper is #72. And his rating is 895 to your 1368. That difference of 473 explains, as Steve said, why you get no points for a win.

12. Tammikuu 2006, 19:11:43
prettymama 
Otsikko: Re: points
ScarletRose: thanks to you n stevie but I think his answer may be right we r playing single games n if I lose the game I lose 100 points go figure n i'm playing someone with a 4 ranking lol

12. Tammikuu 2006, 19:06:03
ScarletRose 
Otsikko: Re: points
prettymama: That is due to it being a set match.. meaning there are multiple games under one match.. perhaps when the invite was set up it said 7 matches.. ?? don't know the exact number it was set for.. but, non the less when the last game is complete you will get points.. or your opponent will.. whichever one satisfy's the contract of the game..

12. Tammikuu 2006, 18:52:22
Stevie 
Otsikko: Re: points
prettymama: It may be because your opponent has a low BKR

12. Tammikuu 2006, 18:48:55
prettymama 
Otsikko: points
Hi my question is about winning points I've been playing spere froglet new game for me but sense i got my bk ratings I have not won any points again this game is show 0 points if I win why is this

11. Tammikuu 2006, 05:10:31
Stevie 
Otsikko: Re: If you put someone on block..
frolind: ok thanks :o)

11. Tammikuu 2006, 05:09:23
frolind 
Otsikko: Re: If you put someone on block..
Stevie: No, they can't.

11. Tammikuu 2006, 05:04:38
Stevie 
Otsikko: If you put someone on block..
I know they can not invite you to a game...
But can they pick one of your games up from in the waiting room?

11. Tammikuu 2006, 02:43:19
NOT a floosie 
Otsikko: Re:
Fwiffo: I agree, please stay on topic.

Chatty posts will be deleted.

11. Tammikuu 2006, 02:37:49
Fwiffo 
I'm sorry to bring this up - but why are people so often using the brainking.com board as a chatroom? Sometimes I have to scroll through dozens of these kind of messages in just one day... totally irrelevant to "brainking itself, its structure, features and future."
It is very time-consuming and it frustrates me a lot, up to the point I decided to remove Brainking.com from my "favourite boards".

I don't know, maybe I'm the only one feeling this way... but I hope people can restrain themselves a bit more.

11. Tammikuu 2006, 00:05:07
Skyking 
Otsikko: Re: Draughts
saii: Did you advertise in the waiting room

11. Tammikuu 2006, 00:01:05
Bwild 
Otsikko: Re: Draughts
saii: you may try the checkers discussion board. good luck.

10. Tammikuu 2006, 23:48:26
saii 
Otsikko: Draughts
To sophisticated contestants,

Please send me a message to my inbox, invite me to a match (public/private) or email me: yahooexcite@hoshmail.com to arrange faster games.

P.S. No cheating!

Happy New Year,

10. Tammikuu 2006, 13:39:57
Chicago Bulls 
Otsikko: Re: i'd be interested to hear what explanation the person gives (if they give one at all).
Muokannut Chicago Bulls (10. Tammikuu 2006, 14:00:55)
WhisperzQ: "i'd be interested to hear what explanation the person gives (if they give one at all)......"

When someone says as a welcome message instead of "Hi" or "good luck to you too", the "gvdl* you too".
I just noticed that and i asked what is his problem and as he has some hours to play i will soon find out the answer to this question!
While you, you'll never find the answer to your question of draws....

*= -1

10. Tammikuu 2006, 13:31:56
WhisperzQ 
Otsikko: Re: i'd be interested to hear what explanation the person gives (if they give one at all).
WhisperzQ: No, there are some who offer from about move 3 or 4 (although it may true that there is game is indeed lost even at this stage, they just don't know it yet ... LOL j/k :)

10. Tammikuu 2006, 13:28:24
Andre Faria 
Otsikko: Re: i'd be interested to hear what explanation the person gives (if they give one at all).
WhisperzQ: eheh, only when their game is already lost... :)

10. Tammikuu 2006, 13:21:12
WhisperzQ 
Otsikko: Re: i'd be interested to hear what explanation the person gives (if they give one at all).
And then there are others who offer draws with each move ... I find that a tad annoying too :(

10. Tammikuu 2006, 13:08:40
harley 
Why try to make sense of it?! It takes all kinds, I'm sure they had their reasons even if we can't understand them.

10. Tammikuu 2006, 13:04:48
Adaptable Ali 
Otsikko: Re: i'd be interested to hear what explanation the person gives (if they give one at all).
Pythagoras: Yes but why, resign from a game, half way through it, that doesnt make sense.

10. Tammikuu 2006, 13:02:46
Chicago Bulls 
Otsikko: Re: i'd be interested to hear what explanation the person gives (if they give one at all).
Marmite: Perhaps he/she couldn't afford 300 games plus the one future games on waiting room.
So now he/she can afford 50 plus the ones at waiting room....
So now to answer the obvious question: why then create so many ones in the waiting room? I saw that person saying because he/she thinks that there are not enough games at waiting room and he/she wants to give the chance to people to play many types of games.....

<< <   359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368   > >>
Päivämäärä ja aika
Ystävät palvelimella
Suosikki keskustelut
Yhteisöt
Päivän vinkki
Tekijänoikeudet - Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, kaikki oikeudet pidätetään.
Takaisin alkuun