Nombre de Usuario: Contraseña:
Registro de un Nuevo Usuario
Moderador: Chaos 
 Espionage

For all Espionage fans


Mensajes por página:
Lista de boletines
No tienes autorización para escribir mensajes en este boletín. Para escribir mensajes en este boletín se require un nivel mínimo de membresía de Brain Peón.
Modo: Todo el mundo puede escribir
Buscar entre los mensajes:  

<< <   24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33   > >>
1. Octubre 2004, 20:47:51
david upshaw 
Asunto: Re:
I aggree. Pieces captured should be shown on the sides.

1. Octubre 2004, 17:53:06
Kevin 
Yes, it seems to do that sometimes...i'm not quite sure why or when... :-)

1. Octubre 2004, 16:17:31
grenv 
Modificado por grenv (1. Octubre 2004, 16:20:13)
<I think that the piece attacked should change to show the minimum value
e.g if I attack and lose with a 2 I should see >2 on the piece.

:)

The "less than" character at the beginning was added by the editor ???

29. Septiembre 2004, 08:48:03
harley 
We need taken/defeated pieces at the side. I can never remember what value piece I used for an attack. Half the time I can't even remember the last move I made!

29. Septiembre 2004, 04:01:48
WizardII 
No, otherwise I could use my 1's and 2's as spies by attacking pieces to see there value. The best you know is that the piece you attacked was higher than you or a bomb.

29. Septiembre 2004, 01:16:52
Thad 
Asunto: after an attack...
After I attack an opponent's piece and lose, shouldn't I know the rank of that piece? Shouldn't the "?" be relplaced by the piece's actual value?

29. Septiembre 2004, 01:16:06
WizardII 
Regardless you should be able to attack any piece. That is not the same as taking it. After your move you will find out the result of the attacks.

28. Septiembre 2004, 20:51:27
DrRobinson 
I think you are right as well. I have not gotten that far in my game, but it is not right according to the rules :oD

28. Septiembre 2004, 19:11:19
harley 
No, I think you're right, thats what the rules say. I didn't take the piece, but the computer would have allowed it.

28. Septiembre 2004, 19:03:26
hellsfury74304 
Asunto: Re:
could be a bug....the rules page says a spy can only take another spy or sapper......'course i could be wrong :)

28. Septiembre 2004, 18:56:07
harley 
I seem to be able to take a number 1 soldier with a spy - thats not right is it?

26. Septiembre 2004, 14:09:33
pauloaguia 
never mind... I just got the answer to my question :)
(they can't)

26. Septiembre 2004, 14:07:29
pauloaguia 
Asunto: Question
So when it says "In standard Espionage, a player makes a move with two different pieces per turn" does it mean that the same piece can't be moved twice in the same turn?

<< <   24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33   > >>
Fecha y hora
Amigos conectados
Foros favoritos
Comunidades
Consejo del día
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, todos los derechos reservados.
Volver a arriba