 |
|
 Feature requestsDo you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board! If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board. For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 > >> 18. April 2006, 21:15:13 Subject: Re: Ads  gambler104: Impossible. 14. April 2006, 22:20:23 Subject: Re: Go TKR101010: Sure. A bigger board/piece set.
Yeah, stairs, of course.  14. April 2006, 22:19:46 Subject: Re: New users Summertop: It's not a matter of trust. Nobody but me or Liquid can do it. At least now. 14. April 2006, 12:43:15 Subject: Re: Black starts the game pauloaguia: Sure, why not. 13. April 2006, 18:59:44 Subject: Re: Black starts the game Andre Faria: Portuguese Checkers are not implemented here yet. 10. April 2006, 06:53:44 Subject: Re: Brainking April Action Summertop: I wouldn't call four short lines of text "annoying". 8. April 2006, 18:19:22 Subject: Re: Statistics mctrivia: Of course. But what would be a purpose of that?
If one roll appears to be more used than the other ones, someone would jump and cry "the dice are not fair!". And it will start another endless discussion and argument.8. April 2006, 13:39:08 Subject: Re: Woohoo! Mr. Shumway: You are fast.6. April 2006, 10:08:51 Subject: Re: Discussion Boards رضا: Why did you disabled the smileys? They should work even if you disable the context menu feature. If not, try ctrl-f5. 6. April 2006, 07:59:05 Subject: Re: Discussion Boards رضا: No, I don't want to create a public Religion board. But the Languages board is a good idea. 1. April 2006, 08:46:42 Subject: Re: hello all :) francescolr: Statistics of clicks on an advertisement. Just make it short to fit to the ad box.  1. April 2006, 08:05:33 Subject: Re: hello all :) francescolr: Why don't you ask on the Translators board instead?
It doesn't matter now, anyway.  15. March 2006, 11:31:42 Subject: Re: The game of (Go). KotDB: Yes, black will go first. I want to make similar adjustments to other games where black goes first (shogi, for example). 15. March 2006, 10:48:32 Subject: Re: The game of (Go). KotDB: Actually, if you don't mind the missing scoring algorhithm, I could release Go immediately :-) But I would like to do at least some scoring support first. 15. March 2006, 10:06:26 Subject: Re: The game of (Go). Marfitalu: Handicap games can be done, of course. 15. March 2006, 10:02:38 Subject: Re: The game of (Go). Modified by Fencer (15. March 2006, 10:02:53) Marfitalu: Sourceforge.net is what I always check first. 15. March 2006, 09:29:04 Subject: Re: The game of (Go). ΜīήďSрŷ: Go is already being developed and the game models are virtually finished (capturing, ko and other rules work well). The only problem is the final score counting which is not solved yet (detecting of live and dead groups, territory counting). 14. March 2006, 14:52:10 Subject: Re: random games Mr. Shumway: It should be fixed now. 14. March 2006, 14:10:54 Subject: Re: random games Mr. Shumway: A small bug, probably. 14. March 2006, 06:54:16 Subject: Re: random games Mr. Shumway: Which tournament is it? It's not supposed to show null. 26. February 2006, 18:26:59 Subject: Re: broadcast messages redfrog: What would you like to send to all online players? What if half of them doesn't speak English?
Wait until I develop an antispam filter. This feature could be easily misused.24. February 2006, 17:03:17 Subject: Re: More power for managers wekke: It might be better to create more different ranks, associated with different functions. Any ideas? 24. February 2006, 10:05:45 Subject: Re: Fellowship teams BIG BAD WOLF: Now you can (send a message to all team members). 23. February 2006, 16:56:00 5) Nice to have a new server to cover this additional load. 6. February 2006, 17:17:01 Subject: Re: Private torunaments pm's whatdidyousay: It's not necessary because when the tournament is finished, all participants are sent a message annoucing the winner and their final position automatically. 5. February 2006, 12:57:38 Subject: Re: waiting games new game creation emmett: Players from your list of Blocked Users cannot see or accept your public invitations. 5. February 2006, 11:28:26 Subject: Re: Ponds and Ratings tonyh: It's not worth changing the formula. 5. February 2006, 09:39:00 Subject: Re: Ponds and Ratings tonyh: That's not possible because your BKR depends on the final position of all your opponents. 4. February 2006, 08:18:49 Subject: Re: single eliminiation games francescolr: How would you highlight it? 2. February 2006, 23:19:52 Subject: Re: Third-party viewing Eriisa: I think so. 2. February 2006, 23:17:07 Subject: Re: Third-party viewing Eriisa: Profile / Started games. 29. January 2006, 18:02:31 Subject: Re: Because it's sort of a fundamental requirement!! playBunny: No. 27. January 2006, 22:47:48 Subject: Re: Proposed changes in hypergammon rules alanback: It would be much easier to create another variant with these rules. 27. January 2006, 22:37:53 Subject: Re: ellieoop: Impossible. But there could be an asterisk, like on the Stairs pages.27. January 2006, 12:48:20 Subject: Re: i tried that way but not working .. francescolr: Profile / Finished games. 25. January 2006, 21:33:27 Subject: Re: "Today activity" playBunny: The original reason was to lower the server load but it's not necessary now (because BrainKing had been refactored several times), so it can be done for all users. Later :-) 25. January 2006, 20:36:35 Subject: Re: "Today activity" playBunny: Because this value is logged only for paying members. 24. January 2006, 22:27:11 Subject: Re: plaintiger: I wouldn't call it "an invasion of privacy". Nobody knows what you are doing, they can only observe which pages you are clicking on - and when you connect to the internet, there are million other ways how to detect your activities. Actually, nothing like a privacy exists. And it's not BrainKing's fault.24. January 2006, 21:44:13 Subject: Re: plaintiger: And I thought it's the cloaked people who were afraid of something. Or is there any other reason to get cloaked?23. January 2006, 07:48:16 Subject: Re: plaintiger: Instead of a green dot, you can see your opponent's current action on the game page. If there is no action or the action is "logging out", the opponent is not online. << < 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |