User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Vikings 
 Politics

Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.


All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..

As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.

Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!


*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14   > >>
15. February 2013, 02:46:49
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Guns, clubs, and hammers.
2011: 323 People lost their lives to rifles that includes assault type weapons.

But

496 people were killed by hammers and clubs.

Hint: Since the debate in the US centers around the assault rifle, why aren't they including in the debate hammers and guns???

Because they are all liars and morons. :)

15. February 2013, 02:37:26
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:'Farting causes painful asteroids.'
(V): first waterboarded and THEN Archie'd ;)

Then a "Swirlie" for good measure!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLsFBQF8ru0

15. February 2013, 02:33:53
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: Speeches are speeches
(V): Isn't that the truth! I get tired of the speeches on both sides.

14. February 2013, 07:19:37
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
Iamon lyme: they'll have to send a "probe."

14. February 2013, 07:18:46
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
Iamon lyme:

14. February 2013, 06:48:10
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
Iamon lyme: cow farts!

14. February 2013, 02:48:03
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: Dorner is dead but....
(V): Ahhh, PJ media is great. BTW, did you hear any feedback on Obama's State of Confusion speech?

13. February 2013, 06:58:15
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: Dorner is dead but....
Iamon lyme: yeah. People get fired but don't kill innocent people. What a sick jerk. He's in hell now probably.

13. February 2013, 06:39:27
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
Iamon lyme: Alex is a bit of an over the top nut. That's why Morgan picked him. Ratings. Nutty people sell.

13. February 2013, 05:42:55
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Dorner is dead but....

13. February 2013, 05:34:33
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
Iamon lyme: lol and I've never listened to jones. No one I know takes him seriously except Jesse Ventura.

13. February 2013, 02:10:30
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:Everytime there's a mass killing the phony politicians try to dismantle the 2nd amendment. It's not gonna happen.
(V): It's mostly the hype from the left that's driving the gun debate. The gun lobby is simply answering the critics. There are bigger problems that the US is facing and those problems are being ignored. It's all political. The politicians don't care about dead kids. Example: Chicago and Detroit.

12. February 2013, 16:38:47
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Great question on waterboarding
How many people are YOU willing to let die so you don't violate your expressed values?

And do any of you on the left see the conflict in opposing waterboarding (Obama opposes it) BUT favoring killing suspected terrorists without a trial of any kind? (Obama supports killing suspected terrorists but not waterboarding them)

So lets see if I have this straight:
Waterboarding is bad.
Killing (it's an assination) is good.

Where is the outcry lefties?

*crickets*

12. February 2013, 16:35:07
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Obama has said that "if it saves one child, it will be worth the effort"
This was in a gun control speech. But is Obama REALLY concerned about the life of EVEN ONE child?

...

Nowhere does State Sen. Barack Obama's greatest achievement in Springfield get attention these days. But he made it his business to take a stand on Illinois' Infant Born-Alive Protection Act. On many controversial matters, he voted "Present," but on this one bill, he led the effort to kill the measure.

That bill would have required protection for a child born alive following an unsuccessful attempt to kill it through abortion. The bill was intended to protect newborns like those cradled and comforted by Chicago nurse Jill Stanek. Nurse Stanek was horrified to learn that some premature infants born alive had been placed in a dirty laundry closet to gasp out their young lives. Jill Stanek rocked them and sang to these poor little ones as their young lives ebbed away.

Now, when State Sen. Obama killed that measure, it was a most doubtful constitutional matter. The Fourteenth Amendment was passed in 1868, shortly after President Lincoln had succeeded in freeing the slaves through his Emancipation Proclamation, and just three years after the Thirteenth Amendment formally abolished slavery throughout America.

Why would the Fourteenth Amendment be necessary? Because some states were still denying "the equal protection of the laws" to freedmen and women. This amendment stated that "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

Barack Obama was a teacher of constitutional law at the University of Chicago. Surely, he had read the text of one of the most important of Civil War Reconstruction Amendments.

And yet, he voted to deny equal protection of the law to infants born in the United States.

He led the fight to strip the citizenship rights of these children born in Illinois.

So, for Barack Obama, abortion through the entire nine months of pregnancy is not enough. The lives of children already born must be pursued. The license of abortion he defends would extend to the right to a dead child.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/02/losing_lincolns_legacy.html#ixzz2KhQPPTwh
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

12. February 2013, 16:11:23
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
(V): Everytime there's a mass killing the phony politicians try to dismantle the 2nd amendment. It's not gonna happen.

In Japan: At 10:15 that morning, 37-year-old former janitor Mamoru Takuma entered the school armed with a kitchen knife and began stabbing numerous school children and teachers. He killed eight children, mostly between the ages of seven and eight, and seriously wounded thirteen other children and two teachers.

Akihabara massacre: At 12:33 p.m. JST, a man hit a crowd with a truck, eventually killing three people and injuring two; he then stabbed at least 12 people using a dagger (initially reported as a survival knife[1]), killing four people and injuring eight.

Anyone can search the internet and find numerous examples of mass murders with weapons like knives, cars, trucks, axes, - you name it- !

True that a gun is easier to kill with. But so what? That's NOT the argument being put forth.

BTW, people who have been arguing FOR gun control, they have been responsible for the HUGE SURGE in gun sales across the US. More guns are being bought and sold than ever before. Not exactly what the left was hoping for. If they keep this up, more people will own guns than ever in the history of the US. People who have never shot a gun are buying one. And bullets are being sold like crazy. All thanks to the hype from the left.

So instead of limiting gun ownership the left has managed to create a situation where people are buying more guns than ever before. When they talk about banning a certain semi-automatic, that particular gun experiences record sales! Way to go lefties!!!!

And like I said, I don't own a gun. But I can knock you over with a deadly fart from ten feet.

12. February 2013, 07:23:06
Papa Zoom 
Btw I don't own a gun but I know from experience that my wife packs a powerful kick!

12. February 2013, 07:22:02
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
(V): in a perfect world no one needs guns. But...

12. February 2013, 07:21:09
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
Iamon lyme: exactly right. I must be smarter than I look because you say smart things and I agree with them!

12. February 2013, 06:06:04
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
Iamon lyme: Japan has more suicides than the US and they have no gun laws. So it's not about guns anyway. Obama claims it's about "the kids" and yet he never speaks up about the hundreds that die in crime ridden DEMOCRATIC run districts. Detroit was destroyed by the liberals. Moderate liberals are ok but the far left are enemies of all that is decent. I'd even go further and say that the far left are traitors to America.

As for the Right, MANY on the right, especially those politicians that are long-timers, are just as bad as those on the far left. They are incompetent buffoons and need to be first water-boarded, and then put in stocks.

Naked.

(And by the Right I don't mean ANY in the Tea Party)

12. February 2013, 02:29:00
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
(V): You'll never take the guns from US citizens without bloodshed. It won't happen.

11. February 2013, 16:52:02
Papa Zoom 
U.S. gun policies are most often compared to that of the United Kingdom's. Following the massacre at Dunblane, the UK enacted a near universal gun ban in 1998. Today the majority of police officers are not allowed to carry a firearm even while on duty, and even the UK Olympic pistol team must fly to Switzerland to practice. All the same, the most recent government statistics show gun crimes in England and Wales have gone from 5,209 in 1998 to 9,865 in 2012 -- an increase of 89 per cent.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/02/on_to_knife_control.html#ixzz2KbeRtLBR
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

10. February 2013, 20:58:16
Papa Zoom 
Subject: BTW
Chris Rock admitted that George Bush is his daddy!

10. February 2013, 06:42:44
Papa Zoom 
Subject: SopperMexican made it

10. February 2013, 06:37:45
Papa Zoom 
http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/215080.php



will someone answer the phone please!!!

10. February 2013, 06:35:09
Papa Zoom 
Subject: What happens when a fuel economy car and a motorcycle collide?

10. February 2013, 06:31:13
Papa Zoom 
Subject: It's finally happend

9. February 2013, 18:21:34
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: It seems to me that a well built car vrs a well built car colliding at 60 mph would be much safer than a light weight car vrs a light weight car at the same speed.
(V): If monkeys rule I'd fit right in!

9. February 2013, 02:09:42
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: There's no way to disable that feature with, uh, that particular model. I've tried, so I know.
Iamon lyme:

9. February 2013, 02:00:40
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: It seems to me that a well built car vrs a well built car colliding at 60 mph would be much safer than a light weight car vrs a light weight car at the same speed.
(V): haha that would be fun. Wake me up in 100 years. I'd be like a cave man.

8. February 2013, 16:28:27
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: It seems to me that a well built woman vrs a well built woman colliding at 60 mph would be much safer than a light weight woman vrs a light weight woman at the same speed.
Iamon lyme: I gotta go. I have to take out the trash, do the dishes, and vacuum. After I'm finished with that I'll ask the boss, er my wife if there's anything else I have to do. Then I'll be back.

I'll show her who's boss!

8. February 2013, 16:22:14
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: It seems to me that a well built woman vrs a well built woman colliding at 60 mph would be much safer than a light weight woman vrs a light weight woman at the same speed.
Iamon lyme: Yeah, I've tried. I even tried to trade her in for an updated model but that didn't work out too well for me. I sang soprano for weeks! Fortunately I'm losing my hearing and I have a strong "ignore" feature built into my brain.

8. February 2013, 04:59:11
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: It seems to me that a well built ipad vrs a well built ipad colliding at 60 mph would be much safer than a light weight ipad vrs a light weight ipad at the same speed.
Iamon lyme: My wife auto corrects me too.

8. February 2013, 04:57:05
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: Teleportation through the telephone lines
Iamon lyme: I need to lose weight cuz I won't fit through the phone.

8. February 2013, 01:58:21
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: It seems to me that a well built car vrs a well built car colliding at 60 mph would be much safer than a light weight car vrs a light weight car at the same speed.
(V): But you need weight for safety as well. Frankly I prefer telephoning but I can't get it to work for me. It worked for Spock. Actually, there is a science behind that idea and as I understand it, it's theoretically possible. But I'll be dead before it's perfected.

7. February 2013, 16:13:53
Papa Zoom 
When global warming (man made) is proven a total farce, the greeners will say that their efforts turned things around.

7. February 2013, 16:12:51
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
Iamon lyme: I can imagine the day when I have to pay a carbon tax every time I fart.

7. February 2013, 06:29:46
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
Iamon lyme: well worms are quite tasty fried.

7. February 2013, 02:37:03
Papa Zoom 

7. February 2013, 02:26:31
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: death by suction
Iamon lyme: They use this method in many abortions and Obama approves it. He doesn't want kids shot (unless they are black and from Chicago) but is ok with babies in the womb having their arms and legs sucked off (especially if they are black and from Chicago).

7. February 2013, 02:24:04
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: BUT we all know that lighter cars contribute to more traffic deaths (and child deaths).
(V): It seems to me that a well built car vrs a well built car colliding at 60 mph would be much safer than a light weight car vrs a light weight car at the same speed. I'd put my money on surviving in the heavier car and the two lightweight autos all would likely be killed. Just a guess. I'll have to google it. Or bing it.

7. February 2013, 02:21:34
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: true it's easier with a gun. But Japan has higher sucked rate without guns so guns aren't the problem.
(V): Sucked?? hahaha That cracks me up. I was using my ipad and it auto corrected my spelling. I never noticed it. I'll have to try to write suicide again tonight on the ipad and see how that happened.

5. February 2013, 20:45:39
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: BUT we all know that lighter cars contribute to more traffic deaths (and child deaths).
(V): hmmmm. Good point.

5. February 2013, 20:44:41
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: Take away the guns and the killings will continue.
(V): true it's easier with a gun. But Japan has higher sucked rate without guns so guns aren't the problem.

5. February 2013, 16:26:52
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: They are not legal for cops to use either.
Bwild: Exactly. The politicians love to jump on tragedies and use them for political gain. Kids die every day in Chicago but they've already got the black vote so who cares? Notice how some of the worst cities for crime are run by Democrats? See Detroit and Chicago-

5. February 2013, 16:24:03
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: He appears to be talking about an eternal universe in which the unmoved mover is able to overcome the problem of an infinite number of past events.
Iamon lyme: So the end of winter and an early spring is determined by some cowardly little rodent who cries at the sight of his own shadow? I say we cook the little bugger and make some burgers!

5. February 2013, 07:21:07
Papa Zoom 
I feel better now:

5. February 2013, 07:20:45
Papa Zoom 
Seriously though:

Today Obama was in Minnesota claiming that if we can save "only one child" it will be worth the effort (to pass more gun restrictions).

Seriously, this guy is a full on liar. He doesn't gives a rat's rump about saving any "child."

He favors partial birth abortion. That's where you take a needle, poke a hole in the back of the skull of a "child" (nearly born child and fully viable) and then insert a tube, suck out the kid's brains.

And he opposes the "Born Alive" legislation (that's where if an abortion fails and the child lives, the child can be left to die (and they are left to die) on the table or in some back room). Obama opposed any efforts to secure the now outside the womb and fully born human baby.

Obama favors car manufactures making lighter cars (to save on fuel). BUT we all know that lighter cars contribute to more traffic deaths (and child deaths).

So much for that two faced lying sack of donkey poo giving a rip about saving "even one child." He couldn't care less if a child dies. It's all political BS from him and his kind. Scum bag.

5. February 2013, 07:14:05
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
Universal Eyes: We have all kinds of laws here depending on the State and local ordinances. But in some States open carry rules the day. I don't carry a gun but I am armed (I have two of them at the moment AND they are deadly).

I also have three clubs

5. February 2013, 07:10:23
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: 1000's of rounds at one time
Iamon lyme: The police response time in some parts around here is over 15 minutes. That's why most of my rural friends are packing. Locked and loaded. (fully loaded and their guns are full of bullets too!)

;)

5. February 2013, 07:08:55
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: He appears to be talking about an eternal universe in which the unmoved mover is able to overcome the problem of an infinite number of past events.
Iamon lyme: Well according to the gopher or muskrat or what ever that creature that sees its shadow is called, we're due for some local global warming very soon. And frankly, I can't wait. But I'll have to wait. So I guess I can wait. So why did I say I can't? I don't know. I need a shrink I think!

<< <   5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top