Please use this board to discuss Tournaments and Team Tournaments, ask questions and hopefully find the answers you are looking for.
Personal attacks, arguing or baiting will not be tolerated on this board. If you have, or see a problem or something you are not happy about or think is wrong, please contact one of the above Moderators OR contact a Global Moderator HERE Tournaments
Purple: An invitation is universal everywhere and in all languages, so...
But in fact I agree with you. There are individual and collective challenges without interest. What should we do?
Teams: - Teams more balanced. - Who wants to win a tournament simply is going to The Untouchables Team. - The position of each player in his team could be random and not always for BKR to create some surprises.
Single: - Simplify single tournaments. - Big Boss should't create tournaments between players. - Big Boss only should create tournaments between fellowships. - This way, players would have to access to the same place to play single tournaments. Like the stairs, the tournaments should be patronized, except prize or brains tournaments. - When i search a tournament, i should can see how many tournament there are (this is possible now) and how many players are already joined. Example: Breathrough Tournament A - 5 players Tournament B - 1 player Tournament C - 0 players
Please Charity, more tournaments no. We already have Abigailll creating 50 tournaments for second. Too many tournaments are creating confusion when players want to sign up. You did the same in the past and, maybe, for that reason, Fencer don't allow you create more.
Abigailll, i hope you undertand my post is for you, too. Stop to create more tournaments.
DeaD man WalkiN: There were some tournaments with prize for paws, bishops and brainknights only (like tournament of Francesco, Nirvana and Emelin), so now many people are playing those tournaments and cannot join your tournament, i guess.
Talk with Fencer to open some exceptions for your tournaments or try create it more later or i don't know lol.
Pedro Martínez, FrancescoLR: I understood what Gerry want say, but i'm not sure (and Francesco too) if all pawns understood the goal of the tournament. Besides, i had some questions about the goal of the tournament at the beginning and sent a message for Gerry to explain me. :)
FrancescoLR: I think the point is know if paws understood which is the goal of that tournament. If they dream win prize so they are mistaken, but if they only want play a simple chess tournament or other type of game, so i don't see problem.
FrancescoLR: I agree with Francesco. Besides, there're players that refuse to use auto pass in games where is possible and that's ridiculous. Auto pass was created specially for that players play more fast in particular situations, i guess, but many of these players don't use it, trying win for time-out or other strange reason. :(
This message is specially for coan.net and tanein, but i would like to read more opinions about my idea. What do you think about a random team tournament? When a team tournament is created, each team join their best players, but with a random team tournament, that task would be more difficult. A good chess player can have to play a froglet game, a good checkers player can have to play a lines game, for example, etc, etc...
So more important will be the variety of games that each player knows play. ;) This never was tried, so why not?
Today, it was created a new team tournament of anglo-american checkers, and there's some time ago, it was created another team tournament of anglo-american checkers.
Well, i like very much this game (and all checkers variant), but i think that could choose other checker variant never played in team tournament, like international checkers, brazilian checkers, russian checkers, portuguese checkers, italian checkers, dameo, etc. There're many choice.
So, i don't understand why anglo-american checkers, again.