 |
|
 TournamentsPlease use this board to discuss Tournaments and Team Tournaments, ask questions and hopefully find the answers you are looking for. Personal attacks, arguing or baiting will not be tolerated on this board. If you have, or see a problem or something you are not happy about or think is wrong, please contact one of the above Moderators OR contact a Global Moderator HERE Tournaments Team Tournaments April 2024 - Logik 5 - starts 27th April May 2024 - Fevga 3 - starts 11th May May 2024 - Nackgammon 4 - starts 25th May June 2024 - Frog Finder 4 - starts 8th June June 2024 - Plakoto 3 - starts 22 June You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 7. October 2018, 21:32:47 Subject: Re: Brainking Tournament Page  TerryS: Good idea. What limit do you suggest? 18. July 2015, 13:47:05 Subject: Re: Congrats Papa Zoom: Aye sir.  12. November 2011, 09:34:15 Subject: Re: Pedro Martinez new black rook ! FrancescoLR: Should I activate it now or wait for the tournament to finish?  4. September 2010, 10:13:48 Subject: Re: thanks Fencer Snoopy: Oh, did I? Yes, of course. BrainKing did it, it's a part of a cleanup script which is occasionally run automatically. 31. August 2008, 11:34:08 Subject: Cleanup The mentioned tournaments has been deleted and all indexes recalculated (to reflect the real status of open tournaments). 31. July 2008, 07:52:14 Subject: If someone does not read the blog 30. July 2008, 08:02:01 Subject: Re: Prize tourny - brains. afella: Well, the former purpose of this rule was to generate an additional income for BrainKing itself. However, it is no longer necessary, so it could be increased to 100%.24. June 2007, 07:08:22 Subject: Re: seedings in single elimination joshi tm: I received many complaints when the first tournaments had been released with random seedings. But it can be done as an option. 23. June 2007, 14:50:27 Subject: Re: seedings in single elimination "Snoopy": The point is to get the top players to the final rounds. I will make a note about it in the blog later today. 22. June 2007, 15:04:42 Subject: Re: How is this a time out? purplehawke: It makes sense but you don't understand Fischer's clock. The game started 30 days ago, now it timeouts. 3. June 2007, 20:21:47 Subject: Re: Something is not right here America is #1: You are not allowed to post screenshots of our site to another public page. Moreover, it would be much more useful if you provide a tournament URL, I don't have time to decipher the images. 22. March 2007, 11:48:12 Subject: Re: please advise: Nirvana: Another one who does not read the blog, not even the game news.  The rules has been updated, a horizontal line is not taken as a winning combination.2. February 2007, 10:00:41 Subject: Re: tournament page helloguesswho: I agree with you, it is very annoying. 25. January 2007, 15:45:07 Subject: Re: Ribbit furbster: I guess so. BBW is the game inventor.  16. November 2006, 13:06:36 Subject: Re: Estonian open Jaak: That's a nice tournament announcement.  8. September 2006, 08:00:41 Subject: Re: Minimum number of players Walter Montego: I've got the seeding tables from Pedro Martínez, they might be a little different to yours but I guess it is correct too. 7. September 2006, 12:08:26 Subject: Re: Minimum number of players Walter Montego: The seeding should be correct now. For new tournaments. This is an example: JoshiTM's all open Single game Eliminator 8 #2 6. September 2006, 19:42:24 Subject: Re: Chaosu: Of course it is possible if you have a credit/debit card. Furthermore, beginning 14th September, you'll be eligible to have a full-featured PayPal account. 2. September 2006, 08:41:15 Subject: Re: A L'il Help... srnity: Yes, I guess this small bug should be fixed.  30. August 2006, 23:01:22 Subject: Re: Jason: Not necessary to make it that complicated. Just copy and paste the tournament URL and BrainKing will automatically add the tournament name. 2. July 2006, 21:36:41 Subject: Re: Edit WellyWales: You probably missed the red message all changes must be confirmed by me before they are visible. 12. June 2006, 07:53:40 Subject: Re: gogul: Yes. But you can kick them out. 7. June 2006, 20:02:55 Subject: Re: Antichess Retep: From rules: "Who loses all pieces including the king or cannot make a legal move, wins the game." However, this question belongs to the Chess Variants 8x8 board. 4. June 2006, 15:13:08 Subject: Re: tournaments and the tournament tip tiv noi: Good idea, maybe I'll add a special rule to the tournament creation system. 15. May 2006, 14:31:52 Subject: Re: Offering a prize money for a tournament nabla: You don't need to use Brains for that. Just select the prize checkbox when you create the tournament and then use the standard Paid Membership page to pay for the prize. That's all.
I don't think there would be a problem with not enough players. 10. May 2006, 16:59:46 Subject: Re: Question on tourney fees SafariGal: Nothing. They disappear. 19. February 2006, 20:07:40 There is no point to continue in this discussion because I am not going to do any changes anyway. 17. February 2006, 06:58:45 Subject: Re: tournament for Bumble JMDLOVESNIRVANA: It's only and only up to the tournament creator. In all cases. 5. February 2006, 08:17:26 Subject: Re: Sponsored tournament with an entry fee Walter Montego: Of course it is okay, such sponsored tournaments (without an entry fee) are already supported.
About gambling, I don't think any kind of gambling happens here because even if you pay Brains to participate in a tournament, you cannot win a real money. And to create an event with a prize is absolutely legal. 3. February 2006, 08:03:14 Subject: Re: rabbitoid's idea KotDB: The solution is to play tournaments with multi-win matches. 1-win match is almost equivalent to a normal game but draws are not counted to the result. 3. February 2006, 07:22:36 Subject: Re: rabbitoid's idea KotDB: Generally said, when you play in an elimination tournament, you should play to win, not to draw. Yes, it requires a more risky way of playing but that's just an attribute of this system. 2. February 2006, 22:54:41 Subject: Re: rabbitoid's idea Thad: The BKR value at the moment of accepting the draw is always used. 2. February 2006, 12:53:33 Subject: Re: single elimination rabbitoid: Yes, that's a good idea. 2. February 2006, 09:09:41 Subject: Re: single elimination Luke Skywalker: Game slots are not used for single elimination tournaments. Because you'll never play more than 1 game at the same moment. 2. February 2006, 09:09:01 Subject: Re: Single elimination Lambik: I might change it. 1. February 2006, 19:08:45 Subject: Re: single elimination Luke Skywalker: Yes, this is a known issue. A side effect of new features :-) 1. February 2006, 10:44:25 Subject: Re: plaintiger: It is currently disabled because I need to test it first. But I'll enable it soon (by uncommenting one line in the source code ).1. February 2006, 10:13:28 Subject: Re: help 8.6.2) Prize tournaments with an entry fee Retep: It was just an example. Nobody says the prize must be always only 25%. The tournament I've just created has 40% prize for the winner. 31. January 2006, 23:04:59 Subject: Re: help 8.6.2) Prize tournaments with an entry fee arpa: Why don't you wait for tomorrow? The S-B is already fixed, it just needs to be uploaded.
Btw, I don't like the word "stealing". 31. January 2006, 22:27:09 Subject: Re: help 8.6.2) Prize tournaments with an entry fee arpa: Huh? 29. January 2006, 15:10:44 Subject: Re: Moving tournaments aloong Walter Montego: I am not working on it. But I plan to do so.29. January 2006, 12:21:02 Subject: Re: Moving tournaments aloong Walter Montego: Simply said, when it's clear than one (and only one) player would have more points than anybody else, regardless of results of the unfinished games of the same section, he can be declared as the winner. In all other cases when S-B points could affect the final order, it's more complicated and it's safer to wait until everything is completed. 29. January 2006, 11:54:24 Subject: Re: Moving tournaments aloong Walter Montego: It's easy to cover simple situations where one players wins all games in his sections - then nobody else can be the section winner. In other cases it can be a little more complicated, as you say, many "if this, than that". It's not the biggest priority to implement it now but I will think about it. 29. January 2006, 10:17:29 Subject: Re: gringo: Because the current system is working like that. The new one might have a more sophisticated algorithm. << < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |