Kasutajanimi: Salasõna:
Uue kasutaja registreerimine
Tsensor: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Sõnumeid ühel lehel:
Vestlusringide loetelu
Sa ei tohi sellesse vestlusringi kirjutada. Madalaim lubatud liikmelisustase sellesse vestlusringi kirjutamiseks on Ajuettur.
Režiim: Igaüks võib postitada
Otsi sõnumite hulgas:  

<< <   1 2 3 4 5   > >>
3. detsember 2004, 03:32:28
Purple 
Just change it. A long as it's not obscene or taken it goes right through.

30. november 2004, 21:05:07
Purple 
WTG Rooster. Now that is something to crow about.

30. november 2004, 01:09:55
Purple 
OK Flooz but it's fairly good natured up to now. :)

26. november 2004, 03:13:35
Purple 
When someone is in trouble there are always people who fancy themselves a Roman Emperor to give thumbs up or thumbs down. Maybe it inflates their own self-importance. This seems like a Brainking related topic Flooz..enforcement of site guidelines. If you think it isn't then I will drop it.

26. november 2004, 02:32:31
Purple 
Teema: Re: This board
Slam is Brainking.

26. november 2004, 01:39:10
Purple 
Teema: Re:
No one is going to rat him out

26. november 2004, 01:32:13
Purple 
Teema: Re:
Only Fencer knows how long the ban is for. He can re-instate him tomorrow and no one will think he was over lenient.

25. november 2004, 18:47:55
Purple 
Teema: Re:
Amnesty International

25. november 2004, 18:27:05
Purple 
I would like to suggest and request than Slam be re-instated on the grounds that one..he is really sorry and won't do it again and two..others have done similar or worse and not suffered the same consequences. I think the deterrant effect has been served. Just my opinion.

25. november 2004, 00:36:52
Purple 
Teema: Re:
Go to membership on your main page. It explains it. I think a 6 months Rook is $20..could be wrong because that Euro is too damned complicated.

25. november 2004, 00:29:06
Purple 
Teema: Re:
Rook or Knight? Rook is much the best bargain IMHO

17. november 2004, 17:09:18
Purple 
Teema: Re: bad words
Ok Bwild..I assume you used lighter fluid. Now step two. Light up a cigar.

17. november 2004, 16:52:48
Purple 
Teema: Re: bad words
I recommend gargling with lighter fluid or bleach for Bwildman. :0)

17. november 2004, 16:44:30
Purple 
Teema: Re:
I don't think Fencer banned Slam for bad language and now is going to turn around and let others start using it.

16. november 2004, 13:43:47
Purple 
Bad try. Fencer is able to check everything anyone sends including me. Think of something else.

9. november 2004, 21:33:47
Purple 
Teema: Re:
Case of guts from Ugh

4. november 2004, 21:31:58
Purple 
I notice some Halma players have drawn games. How can a game of Halma possibly draw?

4. november 2004, 00:13:19
Purple 
Teema: Re: Hmmmm?...board moderating?
RANTS and RAVES

3. november 2004, 04:01:26
Purple 
Teema: Re:
Well said Long John

2. november 2004, 17:13:50
Purple 
Teema: Re:
Sure but it hasn't gotten Slam restored yet.

2. november 2004, 17:10:06
Purple 
Teema: Re:
These are attempted posts by hidden users. They are hidden for extreme pornography an are still trying to post.

31. oktoober 2004, 21:24:24
Purple 
Teema: Re: Jokes
Look again. My webtv is very slow

31. oktoober 2004, 18:08:03
Purple 
Teema: Re: Re:
In the Navy at Officer's Candidate School during brigade drill many of us were told we were slower than Hogan's Goat. Everybody pretended like they knew what it meant. It has to mean something. :)

31. oktoober 2004, 18:01:34
Purple 
Teema: Re:
Old people know it. LOL. (American saying)

31. oktoober 2004, 17:57:15
Purple 
Teema: Re:
My webtv is slower than Hogan's goat. All three sites.

30. oktoober 2004, 16:30:01
Purple 
Teema: Re: Happy Halloween
I was thinking of dressing up as a cowboy but that is so lame. :P

30. oktoober 2004, 16:17:24
Purple 
Teema: Happy Halloween
The 120 members of Purple World wish a Happy Halloween to all those who celebrate it.

27. oktoober 2004, 17:40:29
Purple 
Teema: Re: Interview with....
Purple toimetatud (27. oktoober 2004, 20:42:38)
[edited]

23. oktoober 2004, 16:14:21
Purple 
Teema: Re: IMupChucKing
Kevin is solid and has been all along.

21. oktoober 2004, 21:44:06
Purple 
Teema: Re:
But now Brainking has a new generation of bad boys which gives meaning to the empty lives of the bullies who love to have someone to use to get the attention off of themselves. LOL

21. oktoober 2004, 21:37:53
Purple 
Teema: Re:
Purple toimetatud (21. oktoober 2004, 22:40:22)
..of which you knew nothing. AS IF

21. oktoober 2004, 21:25:31
Purple 
Teema: Re:
Hey the KM only did that to predators, programmers and pedophiles. And only then when we saw one of those going in for the kill.

17. oktoober 2004, 00:16:01
Purple 
Teema: Re:
You are right Red. It doesn't matter too much. Thanks.

17. oktoober 2004, 00:09:03
Purple 
Teema: Re:
There isn't much consistancy. Purple World is listed in Fav's and Fellowship columns but Politics R Us only in fellowship column. I never checked or unchecked anything ever.

12. oktoober 2004, 22:36:06
Purple 
More than just them. Besides they haven't left the site.

12. oktoober 2004, 19:22:33
Purple 
Teema: Re:
Some are so obvious there are fingerprints all over them. And they are all screened by some lonely people to see if lost love has somehow reappeared. Leads to paranoia and illusions and the best advice is to get other obsessions.

12. oktoober 2004, 19:09:04
Purple 
Bad guesswork. :)

12. oktoober 2004, 18:08:15
Purple 
Teema: Re: multiple ID's
Fencer could just delete them and that would also end groundless speculation and false accusations.

12. oktoober 2004, 14:38:17
Purple 
sadly

11. oktoober 2004, 16:44:19
Purple 
Teema: Re:
You can make someone go away by using the hide feature and there is no need to call them out unless you get some pleasure by piling on.

6. oktoober 2004, 02:20:50
Purple 
Teema: Re:
Not stevie!!! LOL

28. september 2004, 22:22:47
Purple 
Teema: Re:
Barnum and Bailey perhaps?

28. september 2004, 03:47:50
Purple 
Teema: Very Widespread
A checker player just complained of the same red X's. Has to be an internal problem.

23. september 2004, 01:02:31
Purple 
The KM did not authorize Glenda's cybering. Strictly a stevie idea. The reason is known to him alone. :)

23. september 2004, 00:55:31
Purple 
Glenda was not a KM operative

23. september 2004, 00:39:28
Purple 
Teema: Re:
We had no one who could beat you Ed

22. september 2004, 21:57:10
Purple 
Teema: Re: Re: BBW
Yes, stevie's memory seems accurate. LOL

22. september 2004, 21:53:38
Purple 
Teema: Re:
Purple toimetatud (22. september 2004, 21:55:25)
Some of our auxilliaries didn't have a KM tag so if you played much checkers there was probably a report on you but it may have been just a one liner..i.e. "likes to chat," "plays single corner" or "weak end game" etc. If you had much of a rating we took a closer look.

22. september 2004, 21:39:50
Purple 
Teema: Re:
Oh my..these were the bad old days of course..Public Relations, Recruiting, Game Analysis, Opposition Research (500 names in the database) Top Guns Task Force, Ratings Monitor Detachment, plus our Pervert Busting Team where someone would disguise as a female and play known cyber guys..then reveal themelves at games end. Some cyber dudes were never heard from again. I can't remember everything. That was a year ago.

22. september 2004, 21:28:30
Purple 
Teema: Ratings Fallacy
Purple toimetatud (22. september 2004, 21:29:32)
Not proud of this but The KM Covert Operations Dept. would occasionally torpedo some arogant hi rated dude by sending in a suicide bomber (often rigged up with a program) who would start a game with say a 2000 rating and..before finishing the game with the target..would tank 7-8 games in a row so the rating would be more like 1400. Then arrogant guy would lose to a 1400 player and take a major ratings hit. This was only done to predatory players but it didn't make it right. It is one example however of how ratings should be taken with a grain of salt.

<< <   1 2 3 4 5   > >>
Kuupäev ja kellaaeg
Sisselogitud sõbrad
Lemmik-vestlusgrupid
Sõpruskonnad
Päeva vihje
Autoriõigus © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, kõik õigused kaitstud.
Tagasi algusse