 |
|
 ChessChess Discussion For posting: - invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu or go straight to the Chess Invitation) - information about upcoming tournaments - discussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position ... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted) - links to interesting related sites (non-promotional) Du har ikke rettigheder til at skrive meddelelser til dette bord, Mindste medlemsskabsniveau nødvendigt for at skrive til dette bord er BrainBonde. Tilstand: Alle kan skrive
13. Oktober 2006, 09:30:38 Emne: Re: the players are not treated equally 435152: www.VESELINTOPALOV.net simply supports the player it is devided to and I think sponsored by. 12. Oktober 2006, 17:15:26 Emne: Re: Kasparov on WCC Elista 2006 435152: Fisher can say many different things. Not all of them is truth. The 12 game is draw. So on board 3:2 Kramnik wins. But due to unfair decisions of the first appeals committee the score is equal. If doping test will show nothing, i think that Kramnik has all reasons to say: "I will not recognize Mr Topalov as World Champion under these conditions" as he promissed to do after game 11. 12. Oktober 2006, 09:22:03 Emne: Re: Kasparov on WCC Elista 2006 435152: Fisher has his own opinion: "all the Russain chess players are not trustfull" I want to say that it's only Fisher's opinion, not truth in the last instance. And Kasparov did not agree with it, as I think he does not approve 911. 11. Oktober 2006, 09:53:35 I think that the rules of all serious tournaments should be restricted. 1. Drag test for all players. 2. Players should be isolated from other people during the game. It is strange that under the screen that isolates players from spectators Topalov does not shows his famouse tactic abilities. 11. Oktober 2006, 09:38:03 Emne: Re: Kasparov on WCC Elista 2006 435152: I agree with Kasparov's opinion. For example Fisher approved Trade Centre attacks on september 11. I think only strange man can do that. 10. Oktober 2006, 09:24:36 From later games we know that Topalov is a very strong tactic player. But in the match with Kramnik he does not see mate in two in second, makes loosing move in tenth. What is the cause of this mistakes? 10. Oktober 2006, 09:07:10 Emne: Re: if Fischer was in Topalov's position 435152: I think that Fisher made a mistake. Korchnoy have said the same things 20 years ago, and now he is sending letter to support Kramnik. 10. Oktober 2006, 08:59:28 Emne: Re: if Fischer was in Topalov's position 435152: I think that people and sportsmans from other countries would behave themselfs the same way in the same position. 10. Oktober 2006, 08:56:14 Emne: Re: WhisperzQ: Ok, let's try without "personal attacks". But I don't think that moderated letters (except one, sorry) contain them... 6. Oktober 2006, 14:37:54 Emne: Re: rating 435152: 1. Topalov(with his team) stronger than Kramnik(with his team). The team is the result of the player's work and so on... Once more: Topalov little bit stronger than Kramnik. 2. Happened so that in this match Kramnik was leader. 3. Topalov uses unfair methods. 4. I don't like it. 6. Oktober 2006, 14:27:28 Emne: Re: 435152: 1,2. I would say that chances of Topalov are better. 3. As for me, I prefer classical match under FIDE control. 4. I prefer fair strong play, and don't like unfair very strong play. 6. Oktober 2006, 13:32:40 One point of view. 1. Topalov is playing better than Kramnik. a. Begin of the game Topalov > Kramnik b. Middle of the game Topalov >= Kramnik c. End of the game Topalov <= Kramnik 2. Does Kramnik use drugs or cheating nobody knows. 3. Does Topalov use drugs or cheating nobody knows. 4. Topalov(his team) uses unfair methods. Results: 1 Kramnik - very strong player with rating 2743. 2 Topalov - very strong unfair player with rating 2813. Make Your choice. |
Dato og klokkeslæt
Venner online
Favoritborde
Sammenslutninger
Dagens tip
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Tilbage til toppen |